| Literature DB >> 29085358 |
Daniel Martin1, Franz Rödel1,2,3, Ria Winkelmann4, Panagiotis Balermpas1,2,3, Claus Rödel1,2,3, Emmanouil Fokas1,2,3.
Abstract
Peripheral blood leukocytosis has been implicated in promoting tumor progression leading to worse survival, but the mechanisms behind this phenomenon remain unexplored. Here, we examined the prognostic role of pretreatment white blood cell (WBC) count and clinicopathologic parameters in the context of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and myeloperoxidase+ tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). After a median follow-up of 26 months, leukocytosis correlated with advanced T-stage (p < 0.001) and N-stage (p < 0.001), and predicted for worse distant-metastasis-free survival (p = 0.006), disease-free-survival (DFS, p = 0.029), and overall survival (p = 0.013). Importantly, leukocytosis was associated with a lower intraepithelial CD8+ TIL density (p = 0.014), whereas low CD8+ TIL expression in the intraepithelial compartment was associated with worse DFS (p = 0.028). Additionally, high TAN expression in the peritumoral compartment was associated with a significantly lower density of CD8+ TIL (p = 0.039), albeit, TAN expression lacked prognostic value. In conclusion, leukocytosis constitutes an important prognostic marker in ASCC patients treated with CRT. In conjunction with intratumoral TIL and TAN, these data provide for the first time important insight on the correlation of peripheral blood leukocytosis with the intratumoral immune contexture and could be relevant for future patient stratification using immunotherapies in ASCC.Entities:
Keywords: CD8; anal cancer; immune microenvironment; leukocytosis; myeloperoxidase; neutrophils; tumor-infiltrating-lymphocytes
Year: 2017 PMID: 29085358 PMCID: PMC5649213 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01225
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Patients, tumor, and blood characteristics.
| Median (range) or | ||
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 58 (36–84) | |
| Sex | Male | 34 (43) |
| Female | 45 (57) | |
| T-stage | T1 | 22 (28) |
| T2 | 35 (44) | |
| T3 | 16 (20) | |
| T4 | 6 (8) | |
| N-stage | N0 | 49 (62) |
| N1 | 30 (38) | |
| Grading | G1 | 4 (5) |
| G2 | 50 (63) | |
| G3 | 21 (27) | |
| Gx | 4 (5) | |
| Leukocytes (/nl) | 7.69 (3.2–13.38) | |
| Platelets (/nl) | 266 (111–531) | |
| Hemoglobin (mg/dl) | 13.5 (10.2–16.2) | |
| RT modality | 3D conformal RT | 32 |
| Intensity-modulated-RT | 47 | |
| Total dose (Gy) | 59.4 (34.2–64.8) | |
| Boost dose (Gy) | 9 (0–19.8) |
Figure 1Association of peripheral white blood cell (WBC) with (A) T-stage and (B) N-stage.
Correlation of clinicopathological parameters with MPO and CD8 score according to different tumor compartments.
| Parameter | MPO stroma | MPO tumor | MPO total | CD8 stroma | CD8 tumor | CD8 total | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low, | High, | Low, | High, | Low, | High, | Low, | High, | Low, | High, | Low, | High, | |||||||
| T1/2 | 17 (68) | 40 (74) | 0.57 | 47 (69) | 10 (91) | 0.13 | 17 (71) | 40 (73) | 0.86 | 48 (70) | 9 (90) | 0.18 | 36 (67) | 21 (84) | 0.11 | 29 (66) | 28 (80) | 0.17 |
| T3/4 | 8 (32) | 14 (26) | 21 (31) | 1 (9) | 7 (29) | 15 (27) | 21 (30) | 1 (10) | 18 (33) | 4 (16) | 15 (34) | 7 (20) | ||||||
| N0 | 15 (60) | 34 (63) | 0.8 | 42 (62) | 7 (64) | 0.9 | 14 (58) | 35 (64) | 0.65 | 41 (59) | 8 (80) | 0.21 | 30 (56) | 19 (76) | 0.08 | 24 (55) | 25 (71) | 0.12 |
| N1 | 10 (40) | 20 (37) | 26 (38) | 4 (36) | 10 (42) | 20 (36) | 28 (41) | 2 (20) | 24 (44) | 6 (24) | 20 (45) | 10 (29) | ||||||
| G1/2 | 15 (60) | 38 (75) | 0.2 | 44 (67) | 9 (90) | 0.13 | 14 (58) | 39 (75) | 0.14 | 46 (70) | 7 (70) | 0.98 | 33 (65) | 20 (80) | 0.17 | 26 (63) | 27 (77) | 0.19 |
| G3 | 10 (40) | 13 (25) | 22 (33) | 1 (10) | 10 (42) | 13 (25) | 20 (30) | 3 (30) | 18 (35) | 5 (20) | 15 (37) | 8 (23) | ||||||
| Male | 10 (40) | 24 (44) | 0.7 | 26 (38) | 8 (73) | 9 (38) | 25 (45) | 0.51 | 32 (46) | 2 (20) | 0.12 | 23 (43) | 11 (44) | 0.91 | 20 (45) | 14 (40) | 0.63 | |
| Female | 15 (60) | 30 (56) | 42 (62) | 3 (27) | 15 (62) | 30 (55) | 37 (54) | 8 (8) | 31 (57) | 14 (56) | 24 (55) | 21 (60) | ||||||
| <58 | 13 (52) | 25 (46) | 0.64 | 30 (44) | 8 (73) | 0.08 | 12 (50) | 26 (47) | 0.82 | 34 (49) | 4 (40) | 0.58 | 26 (48) | 12 (48) | 0.99 | 23 (52) | 15 (43) | 0.4 |
| ≥58 | 12 (48) | 29 (54) | 38 (56) | 3 (7) | 12 (50) | 29 (53) | 35 (51) | 6 (60) | 28 (52) | 13 (52) | 21 (48) | 20 (57) | ||||||
| Low | 19 (76) | 50 (93) | 58 (85) | 11 (100) | 0.18 | 18 (75) | 51 (93) | – | – | – | ||||||||
| High | 6 (24) | 4 (7) | 10 (15) | 0 (0) | 6 (25) | 4 (7) | ||||||||||||
| Low | 16 (64) | 38 (70) | 0.57 | 46 (68) | 8 (73) | 0.74 | 15 (63) | 39 (71) | 0.46 | – | – | – | ||||||
| High | 9 (36) | 16 (30) | 22 (32) | 3 (27) | 9 (37) | 16 (29) | ||||||||||||
| Low | 12 (48) | 32 (59) | 0.3.5 | 37 (54) | 7 (64) | 0.57 | 11 (46) | 33 (60) | 0.24 | – | – | – | ||||||
| High | 13 (52) | 22 (41) | 31 (46) | 4 (36) | 13 (54) | 22 (40) | ||||||||||||
MPO, myeloperoxidase.
Significant values have been marked with bold.
Figure 2(A,B) Example of immunohistochemical images showing high and low CD8 and myeloperoxidase (MPO) expression in pretreatment biopsies of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma. Association of peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count with (C) intratumoral and (D) peritumoral (stromal) CD8+ T-cells.
Figure 3Prognostic impact of white blood cell (WBC) count on (A) LRC, (B) DMFS, (C) DFS, (D) OS. Patients were dichotomized according to the median value of WBC count. LRC, locoregional control; DMFS, distant-metastasis-free survival; DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival.
Figure 4Prognostic impact of intratumoral CD8+ T-cells on (A) LRC, (B) DMFS, (C) DFS, (D) OS. Patients were dichotomized according to the median intratumoral score. LRC, locoregional control; DMFS, distant-metastasis-free survival; DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival.