| Literature DB >> 29085301 |
Alessandra Giuliani1, Serena Mazzoni1, Luigi Mele2, Davide Liccardo2, Giuliana Tromba3, Max Langer4.
Abstract
The engineering of large 3D constructs, such as certain craniofacial bone districts, is nowadays a critical challenge. Indeed, the amount of oxygen needed for cell survival is able to reach a maximum diffusion distance of ~150-200 μm from the original vascularization vector, often hampering the long-term survival of the regenerated tissues. Thus, the rapid growth of new blood vessels, delivering oxygen and nutrients also to the inner cells of the bone grafts, is mandatory for their long-term function in clinical practice. Unfortunately, significant progress in this direction is currently hindered by a lack of methods with which to visualize these processes in 3D and reliably quantify them. In this regard, a challenging method for simultaneous 3D imaging and analysis of microvascularization and bone microstructure has emerged in recent years: it is based on the use of synchrotron phase tomography. This technique is able to simultaneously identify multiple tissue features in a craniofacial bone site (e.g., the microvascular and the calcified tissue structure). Moreover, it overcomes the intrinsic limitations of both histology, achieving only a 2D characterization, and conventional tomographic approaches, poorly resolving the vascularization net in the case of an incomplete filling of the newly formed microvessels by contrast agents. Indeed, phase tomography, being based on phase differences among the scattered X-ray waves, is capable of discriminating tissues with similar absorption coefficients (like vessels and woven bone) in defined experimental conditions. The approach reviewed here is based on the most recent experiences applied to bone regeneration in the craniofacial region.Entities:
Keywords: X-ray phase-contrast imaging; craniofacial bone engineering; microvessels; phase tomography; synchrotron radiation
Year: 2017 PMID: 29085301 PMCID: PMC5649129 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Phase-contrast microCT analysis of woven bone (WB). (A) 2D slice before phase-retrieval processing: the edge-enhancement signal prevents a reliable discrimination and quantification of the two phases (WB and newly mineralized bone). (B) The same 2D slice as in (A) after phase-retrieval processing; and (C) 3D reconstruction of a WB sample after processing by phase retrieval: the woven structure is shown in translucent white, whereas the newly formed mineralized bone is depicted in magenta; (bottom inset) morphometric analysis of the mineralized bone. This figure was originally published in Paino et al. (2017; www.clinsci.org/content/early/2017/02/16/CS20170047).
Figure 2Phase-contrast Holotomography (HT). (A) HT set-up at the ID19 beamline of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility. Histological and HT analysis of the WB (B), of a human in vivo stem cell-treated mandible (C), and of a human mandible control (D). For each group (B–D), the panels on the left (1) represent histological sections with H&E staining, as reference; the central (2), and the right (3) panels are subvolumes of the 3D HT reconstructions where, to improve visualization, all phases were virtually deleted except for bone and vessels (2), or exclusively except for vessels (3). Yellow arrows indicate portions of vessels to discriminate them from possible artifacts. Scale bars = 250 μm. Panel (A) was originally published in Giuliani (2016; https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100287-2.00012-4); Panels of the group-B were originally published in Paino et al. (2017; www.clinsci.org/content/early/2017/02/16/CS20170047); Panels of the group-C and of the group-D were originally published in Giuliani et al. (2013; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5966/sctm.2012-0136/epdf).
Summary of high resolution tomography (microCT) imaging modalities for vascular imaging in tissue engineering. Image resolution up to 600 nm (in propagation-based settings).
| Attenuation based | Without contrast agents | Mineralized tissues (bone, enamel, dentin, etc.) | Good 3D imaging of the mineralized structures/non-mineralized tissues not discriminated |
| With contrast agents | Blood vessels, cells/stem cells | Successful imaging of medium and large blood vessels/part of connectivity lost (no detection of small vessels) | |
| Phase-contrast based | Grating interferometry | Cancerous human liver tissue, atherosclerotic plaques, parenchymal lung, breast lesions, cartilage and renal ischemia | Contrast-agent-free method, excellent for weakly absorbing samples imaging |
| Diffraction enhanced | Breast tissues, cartilage, brain | Contrast-agent-free method, μrad angular resolution/confined to synchrotron sources, not effective in sensing shallow phase gradients | |
| Propagation-based (single distance) | First phases of bone mineralization, blood vessels, ligamentous and muscular structures nerve fibers, axon-bundles and neuron soma | Contrast-agent-free method, high-resolution imaging/confined to synchrotron sources, not effective in sensing shallow phase gradients | |
| Propagation-based (multiple distance) | Bone ultrastructure, small blood vessels | Contrast-agent-free method, very high-resolution imaging, successful imaging of small blood vessels/confined to synchrotron sources |
Arkudas et al., .
Fei et al., .
Hauser et al., .
Nesch et al., .
Chapman et al., .
Momose, .
Horng et al., .
Langer et al., .