| Literature DB >> 29085018 |
Meiyu Huang1, Huihui Zhu1, Jing Zhang1, Diyong Tang1, Xiaole Han1, Liang Chen2, Dongyun Du1,3, Jun Yao4, Ke Chen5,6, Jie Sun7,8.
Abstract
Tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb) is a turf grass species which is widely used for rhizoremediation of organic contaminants and shows notable prospects in heavy metal phytoremediation. In this study, different concentrations of cadmium ion (Cd2+) were applied to study toxic effects of Cd2+ and responses of tall fescue by soilless culture. Tall fescue showed comparable high tolerance to Cd2+ as Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Additionally, the treatment with high concentration of Cd2+ leaded to decreased chlorophyll contents, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation, as well as damage of cell membrane, necrosis and apoptosis in tall fescue roots, and toxicity of Cd2+ on physiologic properties of tall fescue has been well discussed. Moreover, in photosystem II electron donor side, electron transport from oxygen evolution complex (OEC) to Yz residue of D1 protein was inhibited under high Cd2+ treatments, which may be due to the Cd2+ induced ROS production and the replacement of Ca2+ in the core of OEC. In electron acceptor side, electron transport efficiency from quinone B to photosystem I acceptors increased under high Cd2+ treatments, which may be an important response for plants against Cd2+ toxicity and its mechanism needs our further study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29085018 PMCID: PMC5662633 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14718-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Cd2+ contents in tall fescue roots and leaves
| Cd2+ treatment (mg/L) | Cd2+ content (mg/g DW) | TF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roots | Leaves | ||
| 0 | nd | nd | nd |
| 1 | 0.54 ± 0.11 d | 0.026 ± 0.01 d | 0.0481 a |
| 5 | 1.57 ± 0.28 c | 0.08 ± 0.02 c | 0.0509 a |
| 50 | 5.78 ± 2.4 b | 0.18 ± 0.09 b | 0.0311 b |
| 150 | 25.73 ± 6.64 a | 0.73 ± 0.06 a | 0.0284 b |
*nd, none detected; TF (translocation factor) = Conleaves/Conroots; DW, dry weight; data are given as mean ± SD of four independent experiments, and different letters indicate statistical difference significance at P < 0.05 among the treatments by Duncan’s multiple range tests.
Figure 1Effects of Cd2+ treatments on growth and chlorophyll contents of tall fescues. Values were given as means ± SD (n = 4). Means were separated using Duncan’s multiple range tests, and different letters indicates the significant difference at P < 0.05.
Figure 2Effects of different Cd2+ treatments in ROS production and APX activity in tall fescue leaves. Values were given as means ± SD (n = 4). Means were separated using Duncan’s multiple range tests, and different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.
Figure 3PI staining of tall fescue roots treated with 0 mg/L Cd2+ (A) and 5 mg/L Cd2+ (B), and effects of Cd2+ treatments on MDA contents of tall fescue roots and leaves (C). Values were given as means ± SD (n = 4), and means were separated using Duncan’s multiple range tests; different letters indicate significant difference at P < 0.05; bar = 75 μm.
Figure 4Effects of Cd2+ treatments on OJIP transient curves of tall fescue leaves. After a 25 min dark adaption period, the OJIP transients of tall fescue leaves were induced by a red light of 3000 μmol photons m−2 s−1 provided by PAM 2500 through an array of light-emitting diodes. Chlorophyll a fluorescence emissions were recorded by the instrument and most typical curves were shown here without normalization.
Figure 5Effects of Cd2+ treatments on K-band and L-band of OJIP curves in tall fescue leaves. The difference of the Cd2+ treated samples to the control sample (0 mg/L Cd2+) (ΔVt), (A) between F 0 and F K: WOK = (F t − F 0)/(F K − F 0) and (B) the difference of the Cd2+ treated samples to the control sample (0 mg/L Cd2+) (ΔWOK).
Basic photosynthetic parameters extracted from OJIP transient curves
| Concentration (mg/L) | Photosynthetic parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 0 | 1.32 ± 0.11 | 2.62 ± 0.24 | 3.11 ± 0.25 | 4.46 ± 0.31 | 5.31 ± 0.21 |
| 1 | 1.34 ± 0.35 | 2.58 ± 0.42 | 3.11 ± 0.32 | 4.41 ± 0.40 | 5.12 ± 0.29 |
| 5 | 1.47 ± 0.35 | 2.88 ± 0.51 | 3.40 ± 0.38 | 5.08 ± 0.25 | 5.67 ± 0.35 |
| 50 | 2.28 ± 0.69 | 4.0 ± 0.74 | 4.10 ± 0.52 | 5.19 ± 0.58 | 6.08 ± 0.37 |
| 150 | 3.10 ± 0.88 | 4.21 ± 1.10 | 4.11 ± 0.93 | 5.41 ± 0.67 | 6.76 ± 0.41 |
*F 0: fluorescence at 20 μs after the onset of actinic illumination; F 300: fluorescence value at 300 μs; F J: fluorescence value at the J-step (2 ms) of OJIP; F I: fluorescence value at the I-step (30 ms) of OJIP; F M: fluorescence value at the peak of the OJIP test; Values are given as the means ± SD (n = 5–7).
Photosynthetic parameters deduced by JIP-test of fluorescence transients.
| Photosynthetic parameters | Cd2+ treatment concentration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 mg/L | 1 mg/L | 5 mg/L | 50 mg/L | 150 mg/L | |
| φP0 | 0.765 ± 0.01 a | 0.758 ± 0.01 a | 0.729 ± 0.02 a | 0.722 ± 0.06 a | 0.654 ± 0.05 b |
| ψE0 | 0.565 ± 0.04 a | 0.564 ± 0.02 a | 0.566 ± 0.03 a | 0.529 ± 0.02 bc | 0.504 ± 0.03 c |
| δR0 | 0.295 ± 0.03 c | 0.302 ± 0.03 bc | 0.340 ± 0.05 b | 0.314 ± 0.04 bc | 0.442 ± 0.05 a |
| ϒRC | 0.223 ± 0.02 a | 0.215 ± 0.02 a | 0.193 ± 0.03 b | 0.198 ± 0.02 ab | 0.164 ± 0.02 c |
| PIABS | 1.267 ± 0.38 a | 1.134 ± 0.22 a | 0.990 ± 0.31 ab | 0.824 ± 0.36 b | 0.473 ± 0.28 c |
| PItotal | 0.529 ± 0.07 a | 0.491 ± 0.09 a | 0.429 ± 0.07 a | 0.321 ± 0.05 b | 0.320 ± 0.07 b |
*φPo: maximum quantum yield for primary photochemistry, namely, FV/FM; ΨE0: efficiency/probability with which a PSII-trapped electron is transferred from QA to QB; δR0: efficiency/probability with which an electron from QB is transferred to PSI acceptors; ϒRC: probability that a PSII Chl molecule functions as RC; PIABS: PI (potential) for energy conservation from exciton to the reduction of intersystem electron; PItotal: PI (potential) for energy conservation from exciton to the reduction of PSI end acceptors. Subscript “0” indicates that the parameter refers to the onset of illumination. Values are given as the means ± SD (n = 5–7) and different letters indicate statistical difference significance at P < 0.05 among the treatments by Duncan’s multiple range tests.
Photosynthetic parameters deduced by slow Chl fluorescence kinetics
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 mg/L | 1 mg/L | 5 mg/L | 50 mg/L | 150 mg/L | |
| Y(II) | 0.610 ± 0.02 a | 0.532 ± 0.03 b | 0.538 ± 0.04 b | 0.538 ± 0.03 b | 0.445 ± 0.02 c |
| Y(NPQ) | 0.103 ± 0.02 c | 0.184 ± 0.03 b | 0.184 ± 0.04 b | 0.185 ± 0.04 b | 0.263 ± 0.02 a |
| Y(NO) | 0.286 ± 0.01 a | 0.284 ± 0.08 a | 0.277 ± 0.01 a | 0.277 ± 0.01 a | 0.292 ± 0.01 a |
| NPQ | 0.360 ± 0.06 c | 0.647 ± 0.08 b | 0.668 ± 0.15 b | 0.672 ± 0.17 b | 0.905 ± 0.09 a |
| qN | 0.336 ± 0.04 c | 0.489 ± 0.04 b | 0.494 ± 0.06 b | 0.492 ± 0.07 b | 0.585 ± 0.02 a |
| qP | 0.863 ± 0.02 a | 0.794 ± 0.03 b | 0.802 ± 0.03 b | 0.796 ± 0.03 b | 0.697 ± 0.02 c |
| qL | 0.649 ± 0.03 a | 0.561 ± 0.03 b | 0.573 ± 0.04 b | 0.559 ± 0.03 b | 0.455 ± 0.03 c |
| ETR | 28.7 ± 1.0 a | 25.2 ± 1.5 b | 25.3 ± 1.8 b | 25.3 ± 1.6 b | 20.8 ± 0.8 c |
*Y(II), quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion in PS II; Y(NPQ), the quantum yield of regulated non-photochemical energy loss in PS II; Y(NO), quantum yield of non-regulated non-photochemical energy loss in PS II; NPQ, non-photochemical quenching parameter; qN, coefficients of non-photochemical quenching; qP, coefficients estimating the fraction of open PS II reaction centers based on a puddle model; qL, coefficients estimating the fraction of open PS II reaction centers based on a lake model; ETR, electron transfer rate (μmol electrons m−2 s−1). Values are given as the means ± SD (n = 5–7) and different letters indicate statistical difference significance at P < 0.05 among the treatments by Duncan’s multiple range tests.