| Literature DB >> 29084282 |
Lorna Kwai Ping Suen1, Hui Lin Cheng1, Simon Kai Wang Yeung1, Cypher Ho Au-Yeung1, Jillianne Chi Yen Lee2, Kathy Kit Ying Ho3, Natalie Ming Yan Lau4, Cristina Ka Fu Ng5, Iris Wai Sze Chan6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) comprise a highly prevalent chronic condition among the aging male population. Existing literature on the experiences of men with LUTS is scarce given that only a few studies explored medical care-seeking behaviors and coping strategies. The current understanding of the experiences of elderly males with LUTS is considerably limited. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify the experiences of living with moderate-to-severe LUTS among community-dwelling Chinese ageing males and their coping strategies to facilitate the management of LUTS by healthcare providers. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29084282 PMCID: PMC5662182 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Interview guide.
| 1. Can you describe the urinary symptoms that you are experiencing? |
| 2. How severe are your urinary symptoms? |
| 3. What are the impacts of LUTS in your life? (physically, daily life, psychologically) |
| 4. How much do you understand about LUTS? |
| 5. What do you think about the causes of the symptoms? |
| 6. Where did you get the information on LUTS? |
| 7. Do you have any worry about the progression of LUTS? |
| 8. Do you think it is necessary to seek medical consultation for the problems? Why or why not? |
| 9. Have you performed anything to alleviate the symptoms? |
Summary of the demographic characteristics of the participants.
| Participant Number | Age | LUTS Duration (years) | Marital status | Education Level | Employment status | IPSS (scores) | QoL | Qmax |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 69 | 10 | Widowed | Bachelor | Retired | Moderate (17) | 4 | 11 |
| P2 | 71 | 12 | Married | Primary | Retired | Moderate (19) | 2 | 10.4 |
| P3 | 87 | 29 | Married | Primary | Retired | Moderate (14) | 1 | 11.4 |
| P4 | 67 | 3 | Married | Secondary | Retired | Moderate (17) | 3 | 13 |
| P5 | 81 | 15 | Co-habited | Primary | Retired | Severe (20) | 3 | 5 |
| P6 | 84 | 10 | Married | Primary | Retired | Severe (26) | 3 | 6 |
| P7 | 75 | 1 | Married | Primary | Retired | Moderate (12) | 3 | 11 |
| P8 | 80 | 3 | Widowed | Primary | Retired | Moderate (13) | 1 | 14 |
| P9 | 74 | 2. | Married | Secondary | Retired | Moderate (12) | 3 | 8 |
| P10 | 74 | 7 | Single | Primary | Retired | Moderate (16) | 4 | 13 |
| P11 | 81 | 3 | Married | Primary | Retired | Moderate (15) | 3 | 6 |
| P12 | 69 | 1 | Widowed | Primary | Retired | Severe (20) | 3 | 14 |
| P13 | 83 | 5 | Married | Primary | Retired | Severe (35) | 6 | 5 |
| P14 | 65 | 4 | Married | Primary | Part-time | Moderate (14) | 4 | 5 |
| P15 | 71 | 3 | Married | Primary | Retired | Moderate (15) | 3 | 6 |
| P16 | 67 | 2 | Married | Secondary | Retired | Severe (20) | 3 | 10 |
| P17 | 79 | 2 | Married | Secondary | Retired | Moderate (12) | 2 | 13 |
| P18 | 75 | 5 | Married | Secondary | Retired | Severe (29) | 4 | 13 |
| P19 | 76 | 3 | Married | Primary | Retired | Severe (28) | 5 | 8 |
| P20 | 82 | 7 | Married | Secondary | Retired | 16 (Moderate) | 3 | 13.2 |
| P21 | 77 | 3 | Married | Secondary | Retired | 24 (Severe) | 3 | 9.9 |
| P22 | 80 | 3 | Married | Secondary | Retired | 12 (Moderate) | 2 | 12.3 |
| P23 | 71 | 10 | Married | Primary | Retired | 29 (Severe) | 6 | 8.4 |
| P24 | 67 | 10 | Married | Primary | Retired | 14 (Moderate) | 2 | 11.6 |
IPSS score: 8–19: moderately symptomatic; 20–35: severely symptomatic. Only moderate-to-severe LUTS (IPSS score > = 12) were recruited; QoL: Quality of life, with the score ranging from 0 to 6(0 = delighted, 1 = pleased, 2 = mostly satisfied, 3 = mixed, about equally satisfied and dissatisfied, 4 = mostly dissatisfied, 5 = unhappy, 6 = terrible); Qmax: maximum urinary flow rate per second. Only participants with Qmax< 15 mL/s were recruited.