Literature DB >> 29083998

Imaging response assessment of immunotherapy in patients with renal cell and urothelial carcinoma.

Jakob Weiss1, Mike Notohamiprodjo1,2, Jens Bedke3, Konstantin Nikolaou1, Sascha Kaufmann1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent advances in anticancer immunotherapy have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic renal cell (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action of these new therapeutic approaches, explicate the common adverse events, and highlight different imaging-based response criteria. RECENT
FINDINGS: The recent introduction of immune-checkpoint inhibitors led to substantial advances in therapy of metastatic RCC and urothelial carcinoma. Because of the distinct effector mechanisms of these new substances, atypical response patterns such as transient enlargements of tumor lesions, appearance of new lesions after therapy, no measurable decrease in tumor size, or delayed responses are observed in medical imaging studies. This indicates that the established imaging-based response assessment according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines has shortcomings to comprehensively evaluate treatment effects.
SUMMARY: While monitoring response to immunotherapy still relies on RECIST criteria, immune-related response criteria have been established to better address the imaging changes occurring under immunotherapy. Further studies with long-term follow-up are needed to properly identify and predict response after treatment beyond progression. Because of the expanding clinical use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, radiologists, urologist, and oncologists should be familiar with common imaging findings under this respective therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29083998     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Imaging in individualized uro-oncology].

Authors:  J Bründl; J Breyer; M Burger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Influence of immunomodulators on urological imaging].

Authors:  F Peisen; W Thaiss; N Tietze; S Rausch; B Amend; K Nikolaou; J Bedke; A Stenzl; S Kaufmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Systemic treatment of the metastatic renal cell carcinoma: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion-weighted MRI in prediction of early therapeutic response.

Authors:  Yulian Mytsyk; Serhiy Pasichnyk; Ihor Dutka; Ihor Dats; Dmytro Vorobets; Michał Skrzypczyk; Yerzhan Uteuliyev; Andrea Botikova; Katarina Gazdikova; Peter Kubatka; Peter Urdzik; Peter Kruzliak
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Multimodal Molecular Imaging Detects Early Responses to Immune Checkpoint Blockade.

Authors:  Yu Saida; Jeffrey R Brender; Kazutoshi Yamamoto; James B Mitchell; Murali C Krishna; Shun Kishimoto
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 13.312

Review 5.  The Evaluation of Response to Immunotherapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Open Challenges in the Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Alessandra Raimondi; Giovanni Randon; Pierangela Sepe; Melanie Claps; Elena Verzoni; Filippo de Braud; Giuseppe Procopio
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Educational Case: Urothelial Carcinoma: An Overview of Pathologic Diagnosis.

Authors:  Jonathan Willner; Ammar Matloob; Anges Colanta; Samer N Khader
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2020-09-30

7.  Role of SIRT1/AMPK signaling in the proliferation, migration and invasion of renal cell carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Youlu Lu; Zhouting Tuo; Huan Zhou; Ying Zhang; Zhangjun Cao; Longfei Peng; Dexin Yu; Liangkuan Bi
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.906

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.