Literature DB >> 29083989

Disentangling the Sources of Mimicry: Social Relations Analyses of the Link Between Mimicry and Liking.

Maike Salazar Kämpf1, Helén Liebermann2, Rudolf Kerschreiter2, Sascha Krause1, Steffen Nestler1, Stefan C Schmukle1.   

Abstract

Mimicry is an important interpersonal behavior for initiating and maintaining relationships. By observing the same participants ( N = 139) in multiple dyadic interactions (618 data points) in a round-robin design, we disentangled the extent to which mimicry is due to (a) the mimicker's general tendency to mimic (imitativity), (b) the mimickee's general tendency to evoke mimicry (imitatability), and (c) the unique dyadic relationship between the mimicker and the mimickee. We explored how these mimicry components affected liking and metaperceptions of liking (i.e., metaliking). Employing social relations models, we found substantial interindividual differences in imitativity, which predicted popularity. However, we found only small interindividual differences in imitatability. We found support for our proposition that mimicry is a substantially dyadic construct explained mostly by the unique relationship between two people. Finally, we explored the link between dyadic mimicry and liking, and we found that a person's initial liking of his or her interaction partner led to mimicry, which in turn increased the partner's liking of the mimicker.

Entities:  

Keywords:  liking; open data; open materials; round-robin design; social chameleons; social mimicry; social relations model

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29083989     DOI: 10.1177/0956797617727121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  6 in total

1.  Visuo-motor interference with a virtual partner is equally present in cooperative and competitive interactions.

Authors:  Vanessa Era; Salvatore Maria Aglioti; Carolina Mancusi; Matteo Candidi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-06

2.  Dynamic brain-to-brain concordance and behavioral mirroring as a mechanism of the patient-clinician interaction.

Authors:  Dan-Mikael Ellingsen; Kylie Isenburg; Changjin Jung; Jeungchan Lee; Jessica Gerber; Ishtiaq Mawla; Roberta Sclocco; Karin B Jensen; Robert R Edwards; John M Kelley; Irving Kirsch; Ted J Kaptchuk; Vitaly Napadow
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 14.136

3.  Haptic communication optimises joint decisions and affords implicit confidence sharing.

Authors:  Giovanni Pezzulo; Lucas Roche; Ludovic Saint-Bauzel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Are You on My Wavelength? Interpersonal Coordination in Dyadic Conversations.

Authors:  Joanna Hale; Jamie A Ward; Francesco Buccheri; Dominic Oliver; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  J Nonverbal Behav       Date:  2019-10-15

5.  Abstract concepts in interaction: the need of others when guessing abstract concepts smooths dyadic motor interactions.

Authors:  Chiara Fini; Vanessa Era; Federico Da Rold; Matteo Candidi; Anna M Borghi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Maximum likelihood estimation of a social relations structural equation model.

Authors:  Steffen Nestler; Oliver Lüdtke; Alexander Robitzsch
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.