Literature DB >> 29083987

Amide Proton Transfer MR Imaging of Endometrioid Endometrial Adenocarcinoma: Association with Histologic Grade.

Yukihisa Takayama1, Akihiro Nishie1, Osamu Togao1, Yoshiki Asayama1, Kousei Ishigami1, Yasuhiro Ushijima1, Daisuke Okamoto1, Nobuhiro Fujita1, Kenzo Sonoda1, Tomoyuki Hida1, Yoshihiro Ohishi1, Jochen Keupp1, Hiroshi Honda1.   

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the utility of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging in estimating histologic grades of endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (EEA). Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved this prospective study. Between June 2012 and March 2016, 32 patients with EEA underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. After their surgical procedures, their EEAs were confirmed pathologically and classified into histologic grades: grade 1 (n = 11), grade 2 (n = 11), and grade 3 (n = 10). The APT signal intensities (SIs) and the mean and minimum apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of the three grades were calculated and compared. Spearman rank correlation coefficient was also calculated between the APT SIs and histologic grades, and between the ADCs and histologic grades. Results The Spearman correlation coefficient with histologic grade of the APT SIs, the mean ADC, and the minimum ADC were 0.55 (P = .001), 0.03 (P = .84), and -0.30 (P = .09), respectively. The average APT SIs and the mean and minimum ADCs were 2.2% ± 0.2 (standard deviation), 0.9 × 10-3 mm2/sec ± 0.2, and 0.6 × 10-3 mm2/sec ± 0.1 for grade 1; 3.2% ± 0.3, 0.8 × 10-3 mm2/sec ± 0.1, and 0.5 × 10-3 mm2/sec ± 0.1 for grade 2; and 3.7% ± 0.3, 0.9 × 10-3 mm2/sec ± 0.1, and 0.5 × 10-3 mm2/sec ± 0.1 for grade 3, respectively. The APT SIs of grade 3 EEA were significantly higher than those of grade 1 EEA (P = .01), but other pairwise comparisons did not reveal any significant differences (P = .06-.51). The mean and minimum ADCs showed no significant differences among the three histologic grades (P =.13-.51). Conclusion The APT SI was positively correlated with the histologic grades of EEA. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29083987     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

Review 1.  Amide proton transfer imaging of tumors: theory, clinical applications, pitfalls, and future directions.

Authors:  Kiyohisa Kamimura; Masanori Nakajo; Tomohide Yoneyama; Koji Takumi; Yuichi Kumagae; Yoshihiko Fukukura; Takashi Yoshiura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Effect of changes in the menstrual cycle and age on the signal intensity of amide proton transfer imaging in the normal uterus: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Ya-Qing Kong; Qian-Qian Qu; Lei Ming; Zhe Wang; Xiao-Tong Chi; Kai Deng
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-09-13

3.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy associations with clinicopathologic features of estrogen-dependent endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Qingwei Liu; Jie Li; Zhiling Liu; Ximing Wang; Na Li; Zhaoqin Huang; Han Xu
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.795

4.  Amide Proton Transfer Imaging vs Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging for Predicting Histological Grade of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Baolin Wu; Fei Jia; Xuekun Li; Meng Zhang; Dongming Han; Zhiyun Jia
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2020-10-09

5.  Identifying Recurrent Malignant Glioma after Treatment Using Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted MR Imaging: A Validation Study with Image-Guided Stereotactic Biopsy.

Authors:  Shanshan Jiang; Charles G Eberhart; Michael Lim; Hye-Young Heo; Yi Zhang; Lindsay Blair; Zhibo Wen; Matthias Holdhoff; Doris Lin; Peng Huang; Huamin Qin; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Jon D Weingart; Peter B Barker; Martin G Pomper; John Laterra; Peter C M van Zijl; Jaishri O Blakeley; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Identification of histological features of endometrioid adenocarcinoma based on amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and multimodel diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Fangfang Fu; Nan Meng; Zhun Huang; Jing Sun; Xuejia Wang; Jie Shang; Ting Fang; Pengyang Feng; Kaiyu Wang; Dongming Han; Meiyun Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

7.  A Preliminary Report Requiring Continuation of Research to Confirm Fallopian Tube Adenocarcinoma: A Non-Experimental, Non-Randomized, Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Xiaomin Ma; Xinfa Huang; Chunhua Chen; Yaling Ding
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-07-30

8.  Amide Proton Transfer-weighted MRI in the Diagnosis of Major Salivary Gland Tumors.

Authors:  Yun Jung Bae; Byung Se Choi; Woo-Jin Jeong; Young Ho Jung; Jung Hyun Park; Leonard Sunwoo; Cheolkyu Jung; Jae Hyoung Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) imaging based radiomics allows for the differentiation of gliomas from metastases.

Authors:  Elisabeth Sartoretti; Thomas Sartoretti; Michael Wyss; Carolin Reischauer; Luuk van Smoorenburg; Christoph A Binkert; Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer; Manoj Mannil
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparative Study of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging for Predicting Histologic Grade of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Baolin Wu; Fei Jia; Xuekun Li; Lei Li; Kaiyu Wang; Dongming Han
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.