| Literature DB >> 29082924 |
M Pupin1,2, Q Esmaeel3, A Flissi1,2, Y Dufresne1,2, P Jacques3,4, V Leclère1,2,3.
Abstract
Since its first release in 2008, Norine remains the unique resource completely devoted to nonribosomal peptides (NRPs). They are very attractive microbial secondary metabolites, displaying a remarkable diversity of structure and functions. Norine (http://bioinfo.lifl.fr/NRP) includes a database now containing more than 1160 annotated peptides and user-friendly interfaces enabling the querying of the database, through the annotations or the structure of the peptides. Dedicated tools are associated for structural comparison of the compounds and prediction of their biological activities. In this paper, we start by describing the knowledgebase and the dedicated tools. We then present some user cases to show how useful Norine is for the discovery of novel nonribosomal peptides.Entities:
Keywords: Database; Nonribosomal peptides; Norine; Secondary metabolites
Year: 2016 PMID: 29082924 PMCID: PMC5640699 DOI: 10.1016/j.synbio.2015.11.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Synth Syst Biotechnol ISSN: 2405-805X
Fig. 1Graphical output provided with Pseudomonas query in “organism search” form. (A) Pie charts representing the percentages of the nonribosomal peptides produced by Pseudomonas, according to their status, their class, their structure types and their activities. (B) Histogram representing size distribution of the peptides produced by Pseudomonas. For lipopeptides, the fatty acid is considered as one monomer.
Fig. 2Structure search results. Screenshots of the results obtained using the linear pentapeptide “Val_Orn_Leu_D-Phe_Pro” as a pattern (drawn as graph and transformed in NOR format by the graphical editor) for structural comparison.
Fig. 3Structural comparison of sessilin and CLP2 produced by Pseudomonas CMR12a with tolaasin and orfamide. The monomers have been aligned, the full lines represent the cyclization within the peptidic part. The variable amino acids in the peptide moiety are in bold and surrounded, small variability within the acyl moiety is highlighted by a dotted circle.
Fig. 4Structure comparison at the monomeric level. (A) Gratisin, (B) Gramicidin S. Top: monomeric representation as returned by the integrated smiles2monomers tool (s2m). Middle: monomers composing the peptides identified by s2m. Bottom: schematic representation highlighting the repetition of a common pentapeptide motif and the differences between both molecules.