| Literature DB >> 29082642 |
Muzaffer Keklik1, Ertugrul Keklik2, Ugur Kalan3, Ozerhan Ozer3, Ferhat Arik3, Murat Sarikoc4.
Abstract
The use of apheresis equipment to collect platelets has rapidly increased in recent years. We compared two apheresis instruments (Haemonetics MCS + and Trima Accel) with regard to platelet (PLT) yield and efficiency, and collection rate (CR) in a retrospective study. Overall 120 data obtained by Haemonetics and Trima systems (N = 60 for each) were randomly selected among 400 plateletpheresis procedures performed at the Apheresis Unit of Kayseri Education and Research Hospital between July 2016 and January 2017. The CR was significantly higher with the Haemonetics compared to the Trima (0.076 ± 0.016 vs. 0.065 ± 0.015 (PLT × 1011 /min) respectively; P < 0.001). The PLT yield/unit was higher with the Haemonetics (4.4 ± 0.8 vs. 3.9 ± 0.8 × 1011 , P = 0.001). Haemonetics and Trima Accel instruments collected platelets efficiently. We hope that these data will be a guide in selecting equipment for apheresis units.Entities:
Keywords: Cell separator; Haemonetics; Plateletpheresis; Trima
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29082642 DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.12607
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ther Apher Dial ISSN: 1744-9979 Impact factor: 1.762