Literature DB >> 29082634

Learning curve and advantages of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration as a first-line diagnostic and staging procedure.

Ching-Kai Lin1,2, Chao-Lun Lai1,2,3, Lih-Yu Chang1,2, Yueh-Feng Wen1,2, Chao-Chi Ho2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is now the standard for mediastinal lymph node staging of lung cancer. Training and maintenance of technical skills is very important in order to apply new techniques in clinical use.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA from November 2009 to December 2015. We assessed the learning curve, accuracy (%), and whether this procedure shortened the duration of lung cancer staging.
RESULTS: The EBUS-TBNA learning curve continued to improve beyond 120 procedures. Diagnostic accuracy was similar between benign and malignant populations. There was no difference in the learning curve between the groups. Non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA as the first investigative procedure underwent fewer subsequent investigative procedures (1.47 vs. 2.05; P < 0.001), and had a shorter staging duration (4.52 vs. 11.05 days; P = 0.006) compared to those who underwent other procedures for the first investigation.
CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBNA should be one of the preferred options for lung cancer diagnosis and staging because it reduces the staging duration compared to the use of other invasive procedures in initial investigation.
© 2017 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration; duration of staging; learning curve; lung cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29082634      PMCID: PMC5754293          DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cancer        ISSN: 1759-7706            Impact factor:   3.500


Introduction

The prognosis for lung cancer is extremely poor, with a five‐year survival rate of less than 15%.1 Accurate diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes is not only essential to evaluate prognosis but also to devise an appropriate treatment plan. Imaging tools, including computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET), are widely used to stage lung cancer.2, 3 Because of their relatively low sensitivity and specificity, invasive procedures with direct pathological sampling are still needed.4 Conventional transbronchial needle aspiration, mediastinoscopy, video‐assisted thoracic surgery, and CT‐guided biopsy have been used for mediastinal sampling. Each of these techniques has some limitations or complications. Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUSTBNA) biopsies of mediastinal and hilar lesions with real‐time images using a convex probe was gradually utilized since the early 2000s.5 Because EBUSTBNA is less invasive with a relatively higher yield, conventional procedures have gradually been replaced by this technique.6, 7 EBUSTBNA is now the standard method for the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy and should be considered in patients who have a high probability of lymph node metastases without systemic involvement.8 EBUSTBNA is also recommended as an initial investigation for the diagnosis and staging of patients with suspected lung cancer because the procedure provides a tissue diagnosis and nodal staging in one investigation. Initial diagnosis via EBUSTBNA can reduce the time from diagnosis to treatment planning.9 Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration has high sensitivity (>90%) and specificity (almost 100%). Few improvements can be made by new techniques.10, 11 However, the accuracy of EBUSTBNA is quite dependent on experience.12 High‐volume hospitals are associated with high diagnostic yields.12, 13 How to acquire mastery during training is an important question in interventional bronchology.12 In previous studies, different numbers of procedures were needed to develop and maintain EBUSTBNA skills.12, 14, 15, 16 In this study, we investigated our learning curve and examined how to shorten the duration of staging in lung cancer patients.

Methods

Participants

The National Taiwan University Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB # 201611077RINC) approved the study. Informed consent was waived as existing data were analyzed in a de‐identified manner for this study. A retrospective chart review was created using data of patients who underwent EBUSTBNA for unselected mediastinal and hilar pathology at the Division of Chest Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, from November 2009 to December 2015. Patient age, gender, and the number of punctures in each target site were collected. One EBUSTBNA procedure represented one examination and the data were recorded successively. Lesion size was defined as the longest length measured on cross‐sectional CT images. The locations used during the procedure were chosen according to the International Tumor Node Metastasis Staging System reported by Mountain and Dresler.17 In patients with malignancy, the diagnosis was determined on the basis of malignant cytological and/or histological results at EBUSTBNA or surgical‐pathological confirmation. In patients with benign tumors, the diagnosis was confirmed by surgical biopsy or at least six months of radiological and clinical follow‐up. In patients with lung cancer, the duration to diagnosis, the duration of staging, and all invasive investigations for diagnosis and staging were recorded. The duration of diagnosis was defined as the day from the initial chest image (chest plain film or CT) on which lung cancer was suspected to definite diagnosis by pathological report. The duration of staging was defined as the number of days from the date of definite diagnosis until complete staging. All patients received brain imaging (CT or magnetic resonance imaging) and bone scans (or PET) after diagnosis by pathology or cytology. PET‐CT was routinely used in preoperative screening, but not in patients with metastatic disease found by CT, magnetic resonance imaging, or bone scan. In patients whose diagnosis was not made by EBUSTBNA, the duration of staging was dependent on the results of EBUSTBNA and/or surgical procedure, except for stage IV disease.

Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA)

Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration was performed in an inpatient setting because of the lack of a recovery room in our bronchoscopy suite. Conscious sedation with intravenous fentanyl and midazolam was administered. All procedures were performed by the attending physician (Dr. Ho). Two or three senior pulmonary fellow doctors were also recruited for each EBUSTBNA procedure to assist. A real‐time ultrasound biopsy bronchoscope (BF‐UC260‐OL8) and dedicated 22‐gauge needle (NA‐201SX‐4022) were used for TBNA biopsies (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). A rapid on‐site cytology exam (ROSE) was not performed for all patients because of the lack of a cytologist or pathologist in our clinical setting. If more than one target site needs to be approached, a sequential N3‐N2‐N1 strategy is followed for lymph node staging.

Statistical analysis

For overall diagnosis, we defined true positives as any EBUSTBNA samples that showed malignant cells. True negatives were defined as any EBUSTBNA samples containing adequate amounts of lymphocytes without malignant cells, also confirmed by surgical or clinical follow‐up. False negatives were defined as any EBUSTBNA samples containing lymphocytes without malignant cells initially, but discovered later through repeated biopsy or disease progression and confirmed via radiological and clinical follow‐up in less than six months. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy rate were calculated via standard definitions. Significance was considered at P < 0.05. SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Patients

The demographic characteristics of the 252 patients evaluated in this study are summarized in Table 1. There were 154 men and 98 women, with a mean age of 61.29 years (range 17–92). The major proportion of our study population had a final diagnosis of malignancy (169, 67.06%): 133 had lung cancer, 31 had other solid organ malignancy, and 5 had large B‐cell lymphoma. The histological types of lung cancers were adenocarcinoma in 74, squamous cell carcinoma in 30, small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) in 9, and other non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 20. Eighty‐three patients were finally diagnosed with benign processes: 40 sarcoidosis, 18 pulmonary tuberculosis, 1 non‐tuberculous mycobacterial infection, 2 organizing pneumonia, 1 pulmonary cryptococcosis, and 1 thyroid cyst. The remaining 20 patients had no specific pathological or microbiological diagnosis and were classified with a benign inflammation.
Table 1

Patient characteristics

Patient characteristicsN (%)
Patients252
Age61.29 (17–91)
Gender (M)154 (61.11)
Diagnosis
Malignancy169 (67.06)
Lung Cancer133 (52.78)
Squamous30 (11.90)
Adenocarcinoma74 (29.37)
Small cell lung cancer9 (3.57)
Other non‐small cell lung cancer20 (7.94)
Other solid organ malignancy31 (12.30)
Lymphoma5 (1.98)
Benign83 (32.94)
Sarcoidosis40 (15.87)
Pulmonary tuberculosis18 (7.14)
Non‐tuberculous mycobacterial infection1 (0.40)
Organizing pneumonia2 (0.79)
Cryptococcosis1 (0.40)
Thymic cyst1 (0.40)
Benign inflammation20 (7.94)
Patient characteristics A total of 344 mediastinal and hilar pathogens are summarized in Table 2. During the study period, 326 lymph nodes and 18 mediastinal masses were aspirated. Regarding lymphadenopathy, 264 were mediastinal lymph nodes (stations 2, 4, and 7) and 62 were hilar lymph nodes (stations 10 and 11). The mean size of punctured lymph nodes was 15.76 mm and the mean number of punctures was 2.96. In the mediastinal masses, the mean size was 34.11 mm and the mean number of punctures was 3.39.
Table 2

Mediastinal and hilar pathogens characteristics

Lesion characteristicsLymph node (%)Mediastinal mass (%)Total
Number32618344
Size (mm)15.76 (4–53.3)34.11 (13.7–81.6)
Location
2R14 (4.07)1 (0.29)
2L1 (0.29)0
4R131 (38.08)1 (0.29)
4L27 (7.85)2 (0.58)
3P03 (0.87)
791(26.45)8 (2.33)
10R15 (4.36)2 (0.58)
10L10 (2.91)1 (0.29)
11R19 (5.52)0
11L18 (5.23)0
Number of punctures2.963.39
Mediastinal and hilar pathogens characteristics

Learning curve and diagnostic performance of EBUS‐TBNA

Figure 1a shows the curve of the diagnostic accuracy rate of the consequent procedures. Figure 1b shows the curve of the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. The learning curve of diagnostic accuracy presented as an “S” curve pattern. The initial curve rose slowly or even dropped, followed by a steeper ascending phase. The accuracy rate at our institution reached 90% after 120 procedures. The curves of sensitivity and NPV are very similar to the diagnostic accuracy rate curve. After excluding the first 120 procedures for learning, the diagnostic accuracy rate was 94.7% (125/132). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 92.8%, 100%, 100%, and 83.3%, respectively.
Figure 1

The curves of the (a) diagnostic accuracy rate and (b) sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of consequent procedures. EBUS‐TBNA, endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration.

The curves of the (a) diagnostic accuracy rate and (b) sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of consequent procedures. EBUSTBNA, endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration. Figure 2 shows the comparisons of diagnostic yield between malignancy and benign disease. There were no significant differences in our study population. During the initial 120 procedures (also called the “pre‐mature period”), the diagnostic accuracy rate between malignancy and benign tumors was 76.9% versus 69.1% (P = 0.338). After excluding the pre‐mature period (also called the “well‐trained period”), the diagnostic accuracy rate between malignancy and benign tumors was 96.9% versus 92.5% (P = 0.264). We also calculated the overall diagnostic accuracy rate and found no difference between these groups (86.9% vs. 82.0%; P = 0.279).
Figure 2

A comparison of the accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration between benign and malignant tumors.

A comparison of the accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration between benign and malignant tumors.

Effect of EBUS‐TBNA on lung cancer patients

One hundred and thirty‐three patients were diagnosed with lung cancer in our study population. After excluding patients with SCLC (9) and those who underwent EBUSTBNA for re‐biopsy (42), 82 NSCLC patients were enrolled in our subgroup population (Table 3). The subgroup population was divided into two groups: 41 patients who underwent EBUSTBNA for the first investigative procedure (TBNA group), and 41 patients who underwent other invasive procedures for the first investigation and subsequently underwent EBUSTBNA for complete staging (OIP group). The histological types of lung cancers and disease staging were similar in the two groups.
Table 3

Characteristics of lung cancer patients

CharacteristicsTBNA groupOIP group
Patients4141
Gender (M)29 (70.7%)26 (63.4%)
Age63.0 (37–84)65.3 (46–84)
Lung cancer
Adenocarcinoma2524
SqCC816
NSCLC84
Staging
Ia13
Ib01
IIa41
IIb02
IIIa917
IIIb129
IV158

NSCLC, non‐small cell lung cancer; OIP, other invasive procedures; SCLC, small cell lung cancer; SqCC, squamous cell carcinoma; TBNA, transbronchial needle aspiration.

Characteristics of lung cancer patients NSCLC, non‐small cell lung cancer; OIP, other invasive procedures; SCLC, small cell lung cancer; SqCC, squamous cell carcinoma; TBNA, transbronchial needle aspiration. In the TBNA group, 20 patients were in the pre‐mature period and 21 patients were in the well‐trained period. In the OIP group, 19 patients were in the pre‐mature period and 22 patients were in the well‐trained period (Table 4). In the pre‐mature period, the durations of diagnosis and staging were similar between the groups. After reaching the learning curve, the staging duration was significantly shorter in the TBNA than in the OIP group (4.52 vs. 11.05 days; P = 0.006). The TBNA group also required fewer invasive investigations for diagnosis and staging (1.47 vs. 2.05; P < 0.001).
Table 4

Univariate and multivariate analysis of lung cancer patients using different initial investigations

FactorsInitial investigation by EBUS‐TBNAInitial investigation by other methodsUnivariate P valueMultivariate P value
Pre‐mature period (N)2019
Initial diagnostic tool
   EBUS‐TBB10
    Echo‐guided biopsy6
     CT‐guided biopsy3
Investigation per patient1.202.09<0.001*<0.001*
Duration to diagnosis (days)20.4 (5–53)18.19 (2–61)0.1890.172
Duration of staging (days)8.5 (0–44)10.59 (0–25)0.7200.857
Simultaneous diagnosis and staging by EBUS‐TBNA (N)13 (65%)0 (0%)<0.001*<0.001*
Well‐trained period (N)2122
Initial diagnostic tool
   EBUS‐TBB7
    Echo‐guided biopsy7
     CT‐guided biopsy8
Investigation per patient1.472.05<0.001*<0.001*
Duration to diagnosis (days)18.24 (6–49)13.41 (3–42)0.1710.489
Duration of staging (days)4.52 (0–22)11.05 (0–35)0.009*0.006*
Simultaneously diagnosis and staging by EBUS‐TBNA (N)10 (47.6%)2 (9.1%)0.004*0.013*

CT, computed tomography; EBUS‐TBB, endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial biopsy; TBNA, transbronchial needle aspiration.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of lung cancer patients using different initial investigations CT, computed tomography; EBUS‐TBB, endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial biopsy; TBNA, transbronchial needle aspiration. Compared to the diagnostic yield of the initial investigation, higher diagnostic yields were noted in the OIP group during the pre‐mature period (100% [19/19] vs. 75% [15/20]; P = 0.019). After reaching the learning curve, there was no difference between the groups (86.36% [19/22] vs. 100% [21/21]; P = 0.083) (Fig 3).
Figure 3

A comparison of the accuracy between endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) and other invasive procedure (OIP) groups at pre‐mature and well‐trained periods.

A comparison of the accuracy between endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) and other invasive procedure (OIP) groups at pre‐mature and well‐trained periods.

Complications

No patients experienced any major complications related to EBUSTBNA, with the exception of minimal self‐limited wound oozing noted during the procedure.

Discussion

In the present study, 120 EBUSTBNA procedures were needed to reach the learning curve for unselected mediastinal lesion sampling. After reaching the learning curve, the use of EBUSTBNA as an initial diagnostic tool may shorten the duration of staging and lead to fewer investigations to achieve complete staging. In early studies of EBUSTBNA, 10–40 procedures were required to achieve an acceptable diagnostic yield rate; however, these studies focused only on cancer patients.18, 19, 20 In our study, patients with both malignancy and benign disease were enrolled. Longer learning curves for EBUSTBNA were required in recent studies of mixed populations, which reported that diagnostic yield can be improved up to 100 procedures,21 140 procedures,22 or even after 200 procedures.23 Another study reported that a median of 212 procedures was required for interventional pulmonology fellows to achieve expert‐level technical skill in EBUSTBNA.16 These findings are consistent with our result, in that more than 100 procedures are recommended to reach the learning curve of EBUSTBNA. The longer required EBUSTBNA learning curve has been attributed to different disease prevalence. Sørhaug et al. reported that a benign group has a lower diagnostic yield compared to a malignant group under EBUSTBNA.24 A larger proportion of benign tumors may prolong the learning curve. In our study, there was a trend of lower diagnostic accuracy for benign tumors under EBUSTBNA during the pre‐mature and well‐trained periods; however, no statistical difference was found between the groups. Varied populations do not impact results but the number of procedures performed is significant. After the learning curve had been established, using EBUSTBNA as the first diagnostic method for NSCLC patients shortened the staging duration in our study population from 11.05 to 4.52 days. This result indicates that the use of EBUSTBNA can reduce the hospitalization course, lower medical costs, and also decrease the duration in which patients are anxious waiting for proper treatment planning. A previous study revealed that using EBUSTBNA as an initial investigation in NSCLC patients can reduce the time to treatment; however, the population in this study was early stage patients.9 In our study, a large proportion of late‐stage (IIb/IV) NSCLC patients were enrolled (27/41 in the TBNA and 17/41 in the OIP group). The advantage seems to be extended to the NSCLC population with unselected staging status. Performing EBUSTBNA can reduce the time taken to make a treatment decision, particularly by reducing the number of outpatient appointments and investigations.9 The routine use of EBUSTBNA in our study population led to fewer investigations for each patient (1.47 vs. 2.05; P < 0.001). EBUSTBNA has been reported to provide sufficient diagnosis and staging information. Mohamed et al. reported that EBUSTBNA histological samples are suitable for immunohistochemical analysis.25 Kang et al. reported that EBUSTBNA specimens are effective to examine EGFR mutation and confirmed that EBUSTBNA is indeed an effective diagnostic tool for lung cancer.26 During the well‐trained period of our study, around half of the lung cancer patients in the TBNA group (10/21, 47.6%) did not require further invasive procedures as EBUSTBNA allowed for simultaneous diagnosis and complete staging (Table 4). In addition, a large proportion of patients in the pre‐mature period (TBNA group) completed diagnosis and staging at the same time, therefore minimizing the number of investigations. Thus, we advocate that EBUSTBNA may be a preferred option for lung cancer diagnosis and staging. The advantage of a shorter duration to staging is negated if the accuracy rate of EBUSTBNA does not achieve a desired level. In the present study, the staging duration was no different between the TBNA and OIP groups in the pre‐mature period, because the diagnostic accuracy of EBUSTBNA as an initial investigation was statistically lower than other diagnostic tools (100% [19/19] vs. 75% [15/20]). Other procedures are required when diagnosis by EBUSTBNA fails. Thus, EBUSTBNA is not an optimal method until the bronchoscopist acquires the technical skill. Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration can be a difficult and time‐consuming procedure, thus it is important that the learning curve for this procedure is reduced. Steinfort et al. conducted a study in which 66% of the study population was composed of malignancy, which is similar to the proportion in our sample; however only 50 procedures were required to establish the learning curve in their study.27 The faster skill maturation achieved in Steinfort et al.’s study may be the result of two factors. First, ROSE was performed during each procedure in Steinfort et al.’s study. To our knowledge, ROSE not only improves the diagnostic yield of EBUSTBNA, but also offers timely feedback.28, 29 Second, all of the operators were experienced with conventional TBNA. Being more familiar with the process of fine needle aspiration may shorten the maturation time. Our study has some limitations. First, this is a retrospective study. Many clinical data, such as time to intubation and procedure duration, were not recorded. These are also important assessment methods to achieve learning efficiency. Not all of the invasive procedures were performed in an inpatient setting. Echo‐guided biopsy and bronchoscopy‐guided transbronchial lung biopsy might have been performed in an outpatient setting, because sedation is not required in our institution. This situation may have influenced the duration to diagnosis. A prospective analysis with a standardized diagnosis and staging protocol is warranted for evaluation. Second, the reason for choosing a diagnostic technique not only depends on the lesion site but also the physician. In our hospital, not all physicians are familiar with EBUSTBNA. Many physicians still use EBUSTBNA for nodal staging, although EBUSTBNA can also provide adequate tissue samples for diagnosis.9, 26 Third, we did not use a surgical criterion standard to define all final pathologies of the patients, although most benign processes were clinically followed for at least six months and characterized via chest CT. In conclusion, this study showed the diagnostic accuracy and the required learning curve using EBUSTBNA in an unselected population. Diagnostic performance continues to improve beyond 120 procedures. Because we achieved the same diagnostic accuracy between malignant and benign processes, we posit that the learning curve in different populations will be similar. After achieving a satisfactory level of accuracy, the use of EBUSTBNA for the initial investigation in NSCLC patients not only decreased the number of invasive procedures but also shortened the staging duration. The procedure is safe and our study population experienced no serious complications. We advocate the use of EBUSTBNA as one of the preferred options for lung cancer diagnosis and staging.

Disclosure

No authors report any conflict of interest.
  29 in total

1.  ERS/ATS statement on interventional pulmonology. European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society.

Authors:  C T Bolliger; P N Mathur; J F Beamis; H D Becker; S Cavaliere; H Colt; J P Diaz-Jimenez; J F Dumon; E Edell; K L Kovitz; H N Macha; A C Mehta; M Marel; M Noppen; J Strausz; T G Sutedja
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 16.671

2.  The endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle biopsy learning curve for mediastinal and hilar lymph node diagnosis.

Authors:  Alberto Fernández-Villar; Virginia Leiro-Fernández; Maribel Botana-Rial; Cristina Represas-Represas; Manuel Núñez-Delgado
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: results of the AQuIRE Bronchoscopy Registry.

Authors:  David E Ost; Armin Ernst; Xiudong Lei; David Feller-Kopman; George A Eapen; Kevin L Kovitz; Felix J F Herth; Michael Simoff
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Learning endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration - a 6-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Sveinung Sørhaug; Harald Hjelde; Peter Hatlen; Håkon Olav Leira; Majid Salarinejad; Bjarte Nesvik; Raymond Hollund; Kristin Nesgård; Dag Ole Nordhaug; Tore Amundsen
Journal:  Clin Respir J       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.570

5.  Attaining proficiency with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.

Authors:  Yinin Hu; Varun Puri; Traves D Crabtree; Daniel Kreisel; Alexander S Krupnick; Alexander G Patterson; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Bronchoscopic evaluation of the mediastinum using endobronchial ultrasound: a description of the first 216 cases carried out at an Australian tertiary hospital.

Authors:  D P Steinfort; M J Hew; L B Irving
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.048

7.  Revised ESTS guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Paul De Leyn; Christophe Dooms; Jaroslaw Kuzdzal; Didier Lardinois; Bernward Passlick; Ramon Rami-Porta; Akif Turna; Paul Van Schil; Frederico Venuta; David Waller; Walter Weder; Marcin Zielinski
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Diagnosis of mediastinal adenopathy-real-time endobronchial ultrasound guided needle aspiration versus mediastinoscopy.

Authors:  Armin Ernst; Devanand Anantham; Ralf Eberhardt; Mark Krasnik; Felix J F Herth
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Gerard A Silvestri; Anne V Gonzalez; Michael A Jantz; Mitchell L Margolis; Michael K Gould; Lynn T Tanoue; Loren J Harris; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Comparison of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations between Metastatic Lymph Node Diagnosed by EBUS-TBNA and Primary Tumor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Hyo Jae Kang; Bin Hwangbo; Jin Soo Lee; Moon Soo Kim; Jong Mog Lee; Geon-Kook Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Learning curves and association of pathologist's performance with the diagnostic accuracy of linear endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): a cohort study in a tertiary care reference centre.

Authors:  Javier Flandes; Luis Fernando Giraldo-Cadavid; Maria Teresa Perez-Warnisher; Andres Gimenez; Iker Fernandez-Navamuel; Javier Alfayate; Alba Naya; Pilar Carballosa; Elena Cabezas; Susana Alvarez; Ana Maria Uribe-Hernandez; Luis Seijo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pulmonary carcinomas genotyping: experience with 398 cases including rapid EGFR/KRAS analysis in 43 cases.

Authors:  Maria-Rosa Ghigna; Adrian Crutu; Valentina Florea; Séverine Feuillet-Soummer; Pierre Baldeyrou; Julien Adam; Ludovic Lacroix; Benjamin Besse; Olaf Mercier; Elie Fadel; Peter Dorfmuller; Rida El Ayoubi; Vincent Thomas de Montpréville
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Effectiveness of convolutional neural networks in the interpretation of pulmonary cytologic images in endobronchial ultrasound procedures.

Authors:  Ching-Kai Lin; Jerry Chang; Ching-Chun Huang; Yueh-Feng Wen; Chao-Chi Ho; Yun-Chien Cheng
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.