Literature DB >> 29082480

A Comparative Study of Receptor-Targeted Magnetosome and HSA-Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as MRI Contrast-Enhancing Agent in Animal Cancer Model.

Ebru Erdal1, Murat Demirbilek2, Yasan Yeh3, Öznur Akbal4, Laura Ruff5, Damla Bozkurt6, Ahmet Cabuk6,7, Yasin Senel8, Berrak Gumuskaya9, Oktay Algın10, Seyda Colak11, Sadık Esener5,12, Emir B Denkbas13.   

Abstract

Magnetosomes are specialized organelles arranged in intracellular chains in magnetotactic bacteria. The superparamagnetic property of these magnetite crystals provides potential applications as contrast-enhancing agents for magnetic resonance imaging. In this study, we compared two different nanoparticles that are bacterial magnetosome and HSA-coated iron oxide nanoparticles for targeting breast cancer. Both magnetosomes and HSA-coated iron oxide nanoparticles were chemically conjugated to fluorescent-labeled anti-EGFR antibodies. Antibody-conjugated nanoparticles were able to bind the MDA-MB-231 cell line, as assessed by flow cytometry. To compare the cytotoxic effect of nanoparticles, MTT assay was used, and according to the results, HSA-coated iron oxide nanoparticles were less cytotoxic to breast cancer cells than magnetosomes. Magnetosomes were bound with higher rate to breast cancer cells than HSA-coated iron oxide nanoparticles. While 250 μg/ml of magnetosomes was bound 92 ± 0.2%, 250 μg/ml of HSA-coated iron oxide nanoparticles was bound with a rate of 65 ± 5%. In vivo efficiencies of these nanoparticles on breast cancer generated in nude mice were assessed by MRI imaging. Anti-EGFR-modified nanoparticles provide higher resolution images than unmodified nanoparticles. Also, magnetosome with anti-EGFR produced darker image of the tumor tissue in T2-weighted MRI than HSA-coated iron oxide nanoparticles with anti-EGFR. In vivo MR imaging in a mouse breast cancer model shows effective intratumoral distribution of both nanoparticles in the tumor tissue. However, magnetosome demonstrated higher distribution than HSA-coated iron oxide nanoparticles according to fluorescence microscopy evaluation. According to the results of in vitro and in vivo study results, magnetosomes are promising for targeting and therapy applications of the breast cancer cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Human serum albumin (HSA); Iron oxide nanoparticles; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetosome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29082480     DOI: 10.1007/s12010-017-2642-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol        ISSN: 0273-2289            Impact factor:   2.926


  5 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided and targeted theranostics of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yanan Li; Jingqi Xin; Yongbing Sun; Tao Han; Hui Zhang; Feifei An
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.248

Review 2.  Magnetotactic Bacteria and Magnetosomes as Smart Drug Delivery Systems: A New Weapon on the Battlefield with Cancer?

Authors:  Danuta Kuzajewska; Agata Wszołek; Wojciech Żwierełło; Lucyna Kirczuk; Agnieszka Maruszewska
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-19

Review 3.  Innovative Approaches of Engineering Tumor-Targeting Bacteria with Different Therapeutic Payloads to Fight Cancer: A Smart Strategy of Disease Management.

Authors:  Khaled S Allemailem
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-12-16

4.  Biocompatibility of Bacterial Magnetosomes as MRI Contrast Agent: A Long-Term In Vivo Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Xiaohui Nan; Wenjia Lai; Dan Li; Jiesheng Tian; Zhiyuan Hu; Qiaojun Fang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  Magnetically responsive, sorafenib loaded alginate microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.

Authors:  Şükran Alpdemir; Tayfun Vural; Göknur Kara; Cem Bayram; Erdem Haberal; Emir Baki Denkbaş
Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.847

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.