Literature DB >> 29081877

Measuring multivariate association and beyond.

Julie Josse1, Susan Holmes2.   

Abstract

Simple correlation coefficients between two variables have been generalized to measure association between two matrices in many ways. Coefficients such as the RV coefficient, the distance covariance (dCov) coefficient and kernel based coefficients are being used by different research communities. Scientists use these coefficients to test whether two random vectors are linked. Once it has been ascertained that there is such association through testing, then a next step, often ignored, is to explore and uncover the association's underlying patterns. This article provides a survey of various measures of dependence between random vectors and tests of independence and emphasizes the connections and differences between the various approaches. After providing definitions of the coefficients and associated tests, we present the recent improvements that enhance their statistical properties and ease of interpretation. We summarize multi-table approaches and provide scenarii where the indices can provide useful summaries of heterogeneous multi-block data. We illustrate these different strategies on several examples of real data and suggest directions for future research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HHG test; RV coefficient; dCov coefficient; distance matrix; k nearest-neighbor graph; measures of association between matrices; multi-block data analyses; permutation tests; tests of independence

Year:  2016        PMID: 29081877      PMCID: PMC5658146          DOI: 10.1214/16-SS116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Surv


  14 in total

1.  Matrix correlations for high-dimensional data: the modified RV-coefficient.

Authors:  A K Smilde; H A L Kiers; S Bijlsma; C M Rubingh; M J van Erk
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Exploratory analysis of multiple omics datasets using the adjusted RV coefficient.

Authors:  Claus-Dieter Mayer; Julie Lorent; Graham W Horgan
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2011

3.  Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data.

Authors:  Pierre Legendre; Marie-Josée Fortin
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test.

Authors:  Pedro R Peres-Neto; Donald A Jackson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Does nasal echolocation influence the modularity of the mammal skull?

Authors:  S E Santana; S E Lofgren
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Cross-platform comparison and visualisation of gene expression data using co-inertia analysis.

Authors:  Aedín C Culhane; Guy Perrière; Desmond G Higgins
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Simultaneous analysis of distinct Omics data sets with integration of biological knowledge: Multiple Factor Analysis approach.

Authors:  Marie de Tayrac; Sébastien Lê; Marc Aubry; Jean Mosser; François Husson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Using FMRI brain activation to identify cognitive states associated with perception of tools and dwellings.

Authors:  Svetlana V Shinkareva; Robert A Mason; Vicente L Malave; Wei Wang; Tom M Mitchell; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Resampling-based approaches to study variation in morphological modularity.

Authors:  Carmelo Fruciano; Paolo Franchini; Axel Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Microbial biogeography and ecology of the mouth and implications for periodontal diseases.

Authors:  Diana M Proctor; Katie M Shelef; Antonio Gonzalez; Clara L Davis; Les Dethlefsen; Adam R Burns; Peter M Loomer; Gary C Armitage; Mark I Ryder; Meredith E Millman; Rob Knight; Susan P Holmes; David A Relman
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.589

2.  Comparative analysis of molecular fingerprints in prediction of drug combination effects.

Authors:  B Zagidullin; Z Wang; Y Guan; E Pitkänen; J Tang
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Detecting the Guttman effect with the help of ordinal correspondence analysis in synchrotron X-ray diffraction data analysis.

Authors:  C Manté; S Cornu; D Borschneck; C Mocuta; R van den Bogaert
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 1.416

4.  KERNEL-PENALIZED REGRESSION FOR ANALYSIS OF MICROBIOME DATA.

Authors:  Timothy W Randolph; Sen Zhao; Wade Copeland; Meredith Hullar; Ali Shojaie
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  The Contribution Plot: Decomposition and Graphical Display of the RV Coefficient, with Application to Genetic and Brain Imaging Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  JinCheol Choi; Donghuan Lu; Mirza Faisal Beg; Jinko Graham; Brad McNeney
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 0.444

6.  Divergent Allometric Trajectories in Gene Expression and Coexpression Produce Species Differences in Sympatrically Speciating Midas Cichlid Fish.

Authors:  Carmelo Fruciano; Axel Meyer; Paolo Franchini
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  The interaction of resource use and gene flow on the phenotypic divergence of benthic and pelagic morphs of Icelandic Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus).

Authors:  Matthew K Brachmann; Kevin Parsons; Skúli Skúlason; Moira M Ferguson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.