| Literature DB >> 29081820 |
Raquel Teixeira Terceiro Paim1, Stephen Rathinaraj Benjamin2, Davide Rondina3, Márcia Maria Mendes Marques4, Daniel de Araújo Viana5, Maria Leônia da Costa Gonzaga6, Ícaro Gusmão Pinto Vieira7, Francisca Noélia Pereira Mendes2, Paula Alves Salmito Rodrigues1, Maria Izabel Florindo Guedes1.
Abstract
The present objective of the investigation is to evaluate the antihypercholesterolemic activity of the aqueous fruit pulp extract (APE) of Copernicia prunifera (Miller) H. E. Moore (Arecaceae family). Various chemical characterization methods like thin layer chromatography, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, 1H and 13C NMR, and molecular weight by gel permeation chromatography have been employed to characterize the extracted pectin. The present study demonstrated that hypercholesterolemic diet (HD) created hypercholesterolemia, caused significant increases in body weight, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein, and caused decreases in high-density lipoprotein in serum compared with SD group. Two doses (APE 150 and 300 mg/Kg b.w./day) were administered to hyperlipidemic mice for 90 days. APE reversed body weight changes, changed serum lipids to normal values, and significantly inhibited the changes of lipid peroxidation and inflammation in the liver tissues. The renal parameters analyzed (urea and creatinine) altered by diet were reverted to normal values. Our results revealed that aqueous fruit pulp extracts of carnauba reduced hypercholesterolemia showing a potential preventive effect against cardiovascular diseases without side effects cause.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29081820 PMCID: PMC5610856 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6376173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
R values of hydrolysed pectin extracted from C. prunifera fruits.
| Sample |
|
|---|---|
| Galacturonic acid | 0.32 |
| Galactose | 0.40 |
| Arabinose | 0.48 |
Composition of the standard diet.
| Standard diet | Composition (%) |
|---|---|
| Moisture | 13 |
| Crude protein | 23 |
| Ethereal extract | 3 |
| Fibrous matter | 10 |
| Carbohydrate | 43.5 |
| Mineral matter | 7.5 |
| Total | 100 |
Source. Primo MP 77 feed ration label, São Paulo.
Figure 1Chemical structure of pectin.
Figure 2FTIR spectrum of pectin from C. prunifera.
1H resonance of pectin in the fruits of C. prunifera characterization of pectin by 1H NMR.
| Chemical shifts (in ppm) | Proton residue of galacturonic acid |
|---|---|
| 4.9–5.2 | H-1 |
| 3.74 | H-4 |
| 3.97 | H-3 |
| 4.90 | H-4 |
| 4.9–5.4 | H-5 (COOMe) |
| 4.60 | H-5 (COO−) |
| 3.75 | OCH3 |
Figure 3(a) 13CNMR spectrum of pectin obtained from C. prunifera fruits (D20,125 mHz). (b) Expansion of the (50–105 ppm) 13CNMR spectrum of pectin obtained from C. prunifera fruits (D20,125 mHz).
13CNMR spectrum for sample of pectin from C. prunifera.
| Polymer | Carbon | Chemical Shifts (in ppm) |
|---|---|---|
| Galacturonan | C-6 free | 172.8 |
| Galacturonan | C-6 ester | 171.0 |
| Arabinan | C-1 | — |
| Galacturonan | C-1 | 100.5 |
| Arabinan | C-4 | 84.5 |
| Arabinan | C-4 | 83.0 |
| Arabinan | C-2 | 81.0 |
| Galacturonan | C-4 | 79.1 |
| Galactan | C-4 | 77.1 |
| Arabinan | C-3 | 76.8 |
| Galacturonan | C-3 | 71.6 |
| Galacturonan | C-5 | 73.8 |
| Galacturonan | C-2 | 68.3 |
| Arabinan | C-5 | 67.0 |
| Galactan | C-6 | 61.6 |
| Arabinan | C-5 | 61.0 |
| Galacturonan | OCH3 | 53.5 |
“—”: not detected.
Mean values of the molecular weight of the pectin C. prunifera.
| Total weight | Mn | Mw | Mz | Mz1 | Mw/Mn |
| 25721 | 65924 | 133266 | 203367 | 2.56310 |
Number average molecular mass (Mn); weight average molecular mass (Mw); molecular weight Z average (Mz); molecular weight Z + 1 average (Mz1).
Figure 4Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) of the pectin from C. prunifera fruits.
Effects of APE/simvastatin treatment on serum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels in mice fed with HD for 30, 60, and 90 days.
| Parameters (days) | SD | HD | SIMV | APE150 | APE300 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cholesterol level | |||||
| Baseline | 106.3 ± 3.75 | 210.7 ± 6.35a | 199.0 ± 5.08a | 197.6 ± 5.44a | 201.9 ± 6.29a |
| 30 days | 167.7 ± 6.02 | 273.9 ± 9.12a | 197.0 ± 3.05a,b | 183.4 ± 4.29b | 175.6 ± 4.74b |
| 60 days | 155.9 ± 7.49 | 270.0 ± 11.98a | 252.9 ± 5.58a | 183.3 ± 7.88b | 185.3 ± 10.95b |
| 90 days | 175.0 ± 8.93 | 220.4 ± 8.49a | 191.7 ± 8.67b | 189.1 ± 5.14b | 205.0 ± 5.55a |
| Triglycerides level | |||||
| Baseline | 102.0 ± 9,93 | 79.14 ± 3,01 | 107.1 ± 3,95 | 80.86 ± 9,86 | 84.00 ± 5,81 |
| 30 days | 157.6 ± 9.18 | 147.3 ± 8.27 | 89.14 ± 2.34a,b | 65.71 ± 7.63a,b | 67.29 ± 4.32a,b |
| 60 days | 180.6 ± 8.53 | 171.5 ± 14.41 | 127.9 ± 7.02a,b | 95.00 ± 7.11a,b | 103.7 ± 9.31a,b |
| 90 days | 192.0 ± 14.44 | 182.1 ± 19.81 | 161.0 ± 19.24 | 105.0 ± 7.72a,b | 101.9 ± 7.14a,b |
| HDL level | |||||
| Baseline | 74.57 ± 4.09 | 83.86 ± 3.51 | 83.43 ± 2.27 | 85.86 ± 3.72 | 87.29 ± 1.66 |
| 30 days | 93.71 ± 2.50 | 108.1 ± 3.88a | 97.86 ± 4.28b | 84.00 ± 3.02a,b | 80.00 ± 2.31a,b |
| 60 days | 90.71 ± 3.54 | 101.9 ± 5.00 | 115.1 ± 5.44a | 116.3 ± 6.00a | 101.6 ± 3.55 |
| 90 days | 100.6 ± 4.38 | 70.57 ± 2.43a | 96.29 ± 3.06b | 103.7 ± 3.15b | 91.29 ± 1.69b |
| LDL level | |||||
| Baseline | 14.10 ± 0.81 | 111.0 ± 7.25a | 94.14 ± 4.98a | 95.54 ± 4.15a | 97.77 ± 5.96a |
| 30 days | 42.49 ± 7.01 | 136.3 ± 12.61a | 81.31 ± 3.67a,b | 86.29 ± 6.06a,b | 82.11 ± 5.26a,b |
| 60 days | 34.65 ± 3.27 | 133.8 ± 9.35a | 112.1 ± 9.95a | 48.00 ± 8.68b | 62.97 ± 9.17b |
| 90 days | 36.03 ± 5.39 | 113.4 ± 8.41a | 63.23 ± 6.29a,b | 64.43 ± 8.14a,b | 93.34 ± 6.08a |
SD, standard diet; HD, hypercholesterolaemic diet; SIMV, simvastatin (20 mg/Kg/day, i.g.); TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides. APE 150, APE 300 (aqueous fruit pulp extracts 150 and 300 mg/Kg/day, i.g.). Values are given as the mean ± SEM of 7 mice per group. To analyze the significance of the differences between the samples of authors used analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Newman-Keuls comparison test, aP < 0.05 versus the SD group; bP < 0.05 versus HD group.
Effects of APE on weight and total weight gain of mice submitted to the hypercholesterolemic diet.
| Groups | Initial weight (g) | Final weight (g) | Total weight gain (g) | Food intake (g/mice/day) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 days | 60 days | 90 days | ||||
| SD | 30.89 ± 1.74 | 42.34 ± 2.25 | 11.46 ± 2.68 | 5.39 ± 0.21 | 5.52 ± 0.17 | 5.34 ± 0.07 |
| HD | 32.8 ± 0.56 | 51.96 ± 1.8a | 19.16 ± 3.69 | 5.22 ± 0.22 | 5.38 ± 0.25 | 5.46 ± 0.07 |
| SIMV | 31.41 ± 0.59 | 48.3 ± 2.15 | 16.89 ± 4.29 | 5.53 ± 0.22 | 5.65 ± 0.20 | 5.66 ± 0.09 |
| APE 150 | 32.74 ± 0.54 | 43.86 ± 0.53b | 11.11 ± 1.98 | 4.73 ± 0.22 | 5.0 ± 0.06 | 4.62 ± 0.17a,b |
| APE 300 | 33.04 ± 0.83 | 44.79 ± 0.81b | 11.74 ± 2.64 | 4.93 ± 0.26 | 5.77 ± 0.20 | 5.67 ± 0.16 |
SD, standard diet; HD, hypercholesterolaemic diet; SIMV, simvastatin (20 mg/Kg/day, i.g.); APE 150, APE 300 (aqueous fruit pulp extracts 150 and 300 mg/Kg/day, i.g.). Values are given as the mean ± SEM of 7 mice per group. To analyze the significance of the differences between the samples of authors used analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Newman-Keuls comparison test, aP < 0.05 versus the SD group; bP < 0.05 versus HD group.
Effects of APE on the relative liver weight, malondialdehyde in liver tissue and serum renal metabolites of mice submitted to the hypercholesterolemic diet.
| Parameters | SD | HD | SIMV | APE150 | APE300 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLW | 3.76 ± 0.15 | 4.88 ± 0.35a | 4.17 ± 0.18 | 4.29 ± 0.16 | 4.36 ± 0.11 |
| MDA | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.39 ± 0.05a | — | 0.21 ± 0.01b | 0.22 ± 0.01b |
| AST | 95.57 ± 9.90 | 85.57 ± 12.24 | 190.7 ± 14.85a,b | 95.00 ± 11.98 | 105.4 ± 12.46 |
| UREA | 47.14 ± 1.46 | 55.86 ± 1.22a | 53.57 ± 1.34a | 46.43 ± 2.69b | 37.43 ± 1.90a,b |
| CREAT | 0.88 ± 0.04 | 0.62 ± 0.06a | 0.58 ± 0.07a | 0.55 ± 0.04a | 0.84 ± 0.05b |
SD, standard diet; HD, hypercholesterolaemic diet; SIMV, simvastatin (20 mg/Kg/day, i.g.); RLW, relative liver weight (relative liver weight = liver weight in percent of body weight); MDA, malondialdehyde; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CREAT, creatinine. APE 150, APE 300 (aqueous fruit pulp extracts 150 and 300 mg/Kg/day, i.g.). Values are given as the mean ± SEM of 7 mice per group. To analyze the significance of the differences between the samples of authors used analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Newman-Keuls comparison test, aP < 0.05 versus the SD group; bP < 0.05 versus HD group.
Figure 5Histopathology images of liver and kidney hypercholesterolemic animals treated with APE. ((a)–(d)) Liver. (a) Standard diet, (b) hypercholesterolemic diet, (c) simvastatin, and (d) APE, aqueous fruit pulp extracts. Representative areas of inflammatory process consisting of neutrophils, macrophages, lymphocytes, and plasma cells (white arrows). ((e)–(g)) Liver. (e) Hypercholesterolemic diet, (f) simvastatin, and (g) APE, aqueous fruit pulp extracts. HE, fat droplets representing hepatic steatosis. ((h)–(k)) Kidney. (e) Standard diet, (f) hypercholesterolemic diet, (g) simvastatin, and (h) APE, aqueous fruit pulp extracts. HE, 200x.