| Literature DB >> 29081815 |
Ruixian Wu1, Qian Li2, Xiaohua Pei2, Kefei Hu3.
Abstract
The present study examined the effects of brucine on the OPG/RANKL/RANK signaling pathway for exploring the mechanism of brucine suppression of bone metastasis in breast cancer. MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and mouse osteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells were cocultured to mimic the breast cancer bone metastasis microenvironment in vitro. qRT-PCR and Western blotting were used to detect the expressions of OPG and RANKL at the mRNA and protein levels, respectively, in brucine-treated cultures and they were compared to those in untreated cultures. We aimed to understand the effect of brucine on the entire OPG/RANKL/RANK signaling pathway after analyzing these effects. Results showed that brucine treatment significantly increased both the OPG mRNA/RANKL mRNA expression ratio and the OPG protein/RANKL protein ratio in cocultures compared to those in untreated cocultures (P < 0.01). Brucine, therefore, plays a regulatory role in the OPG/RANKL/RANK signaling pathway, suggesting that it can indirectly control osteoclasts by regulating the expression and secretion of OPG and RANKL in osteoblast cells, thereby inhibiting the differentiation and bone resorption function of osteoclasts.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29081815 PMCID: PMC5634620 DOI: 10.1155/2017/1693643
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Primer sequences.
| Name | Primer sequence |
|---|---|
| OPG upstream primer | 5′-ATGGACAACCCAGGAAACCC-3′ |
| OPG downstream primer | 5′-GTAGGTGCCAGGAGCACATT-3′ |
| RANKL upstream primer | 5′-ATGATGGAAGGCTCATGGTTGG-3′ |
| RANKL downstream primer | 5′-CAGCATTGATGGTGAGGTGTG-3′ |
| GAPDH upstream primer | 5′-AGCCTTCCTTCTTGGGTATG-3′ |
| GAPDH downstream primer | 5′-GGTCTTTACGGATGTCAACG-3′ |
Figure 1Comparison of OPG mRNA levels in different experimental groups.
Figure 2Comparison of RANKL mRNA levels in different experimental groups.
Figure 3Comparison of the OPG mRNA/RANKL mRNA ratio in different experimental groups. Notes. ##P < 0.01, compared to the control group; P < 0.01, compared to the model group.
Figure 4Comparison of OPG protein levels in different experimental groups.
Figure 5Histogram showing RANKL protein level in different experimental groups.
Figure 6Comparison of the OPG protein /RANKL protein ratio in different experimental groups. Notes. ##P < 0.01, compared to the control group; P < 0.01, compared to the model group.