| Literature DB >> 29081464 |
Eunju Shin1, Simon Mduma2, Julius Keyyu2, Robert Fyumagwa2, Yeonhee Lee1.
Abstract
We isolated Enterococcus species that colonized in the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in order to investigate their genetic relatedness and antimicrobial susceptibility. A total of 219 isolates were obtained and a 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed they were classified into Enterococcus avium, E. casseliflavus, E. faecalis, E. faecium, E. hirae, or E. mundtii. Multilocus sequence typing of E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates indicated that some of the isolates showed an evolutionary distance that was far from the primary founders. The antimicrobial susceptibility of the enterococcal isolates suggested that the significant transmission of antimicrobial resistance via human intervention had not yet occurred.Entities:
Keywords: African buffalo; Enterococcus species; MLST; antimicrobial susceptibility; phylogeny
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29081464 PMCID: PMC5745028 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME17025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Proportion and minimal inhibitory concentrations of Enterococcus species isolated from ear and rectal swab samples of the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in the Serengeti, Tanzania.
| Species (no. of isolates) | No. of isolates (%) | MIC (μg mL−1) range | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| Ear | Fecal | Total | AMP (≥16) | CM (≥32) | CIP (≥4) | EM (≥8) | GM (≥500) | NOR (≥16) | SYN (≥4) | TEI (≥32) | TET (≥16) | VAN (≥32) | |
| 6 (6.3) | 0 (0) | 6 (2.7) | ≤0.25–1 | 4–8 | 1–2 | ≤0.25 | 0.5–4 | 1–4 | 1–4 | 0.13–2 | ≤0.25–1 | ≤0.5–4 | |
| 67 (69.8) | 43 (35.0) | 110 (50.2) | ≤0.25–1 | 4–8 | 0.5–2 | ≤0.25–4 | 1–8 | 2–16 | 0.5–8 | 0.06–4 | ≤0.25–1 | 1–8 | |
| 12 (12.5) | 7 (5.7) | 19 (8.7) | ≤0.25–2 | 4–8 | 0.5–2 | ≤0.25–1 | 2–32 | 1–8 | 2–16 | 0.06–4 | 0.5–1 | 1–8 | |
| 1 (10) | 15 (12.2) | 16 (7.3) | ≤0.25–4 | 4–8 | 0.5–2 | ≤0.25–4 | 2–8 | 1–8 | ≤0.25–2 | 0.25–4 | ≤0.25–0.5 | ≤0.5–8 | |
| 0 (0) | 3 (2.4) | 3 (1.4) | 1–2 | 4–8 | ≤0.25–1 | ≤0.25 | 2–8 | 1–4 | 1–2 | 0.13–0.5 | ≤0.25–1 | 1 | |
| 10 (10.4) | 55 (44.7) | 65 (29.7) | ≤0.25–1 | 4–8 | 0.5–2 | ≤0.25–1 | 1–8 | 2–16 | ≤0.25–8 | ≤0.03–4 | ≤0.25–1 | ≤0.5–12 | |
| Total | 96 (100) | 123 (100) | 219 (100) | ≤0.25–4 | 4–8 | ≤0.25–2 | ≤0.25–4 | 0.5–32 | 1–16 | ≤0.25–8 | ≤0.03–4 | ≤0.25–1 | ≤0.5–12 |
| % Susceptible | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 99.1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||
AMP, ampicillin; CM, chloramphenicol; CIP, ciprofloxacin; EM, erythromycin; GM, gentamicin; NOR, norfloxacin; SYN, synercid; TEI, teicoplanin; TET, tetracycline; VAN, vancomycin. Values in parentheses are the criterion limits for resistance according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).
Proportion of isolates that are susceptible to an antimicrobial.
Two isolates E. casseliflavus CCARM 5297 and E. mundtii CCARM 5284 detected from a fecal sample were 16 μg mL−1.
Multilocus sequence types of 19 Enterococcus faecalis and 16 E. faecium isolates from the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in the Serengeti, Tanzania.
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST | Allele | No. of isolates | eBURST group | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ST-273 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 13 | 40 | 46 | 22 | 1 | 26 |
| ST-436 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 17 | 6 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
| 12 | 10 | 3 | 17 | 31 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 11 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 17 | 7 | 16 | 5 | 75 | 1 | 9 | 1 | singleton | |
| 5 | 2 | 50 | |||||||
| 34 | 1 | 3 | 1 | singleton | |||||
| 4 | 28 | 17 | 37 | 29 | 23 | 17 | 1 | 20 | |
| 20 | 1 | 14 | 15 | 3 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 52 | |
| 6 | 7 | 16 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 16 | ||
| 12 | 5 | 1 | 50 | ||||||
| 14 | 8 | 12 | 13 | 31 | 46 | 22 | 1 | 26 | |
| 81 | 1 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 28 | 1 | singleton | ||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Allele | No. of isolates | eBURST group | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
| 2 | 9 | 7 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |||
| 2 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 22 | 1 | 8 | 8 | ||
| 20 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | singleton | ||||
| 62 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | |
ST, sequence type. New STs identified in this study are in boldface.
New alleles identified in this study are written in italics and boldface.
STs sharing five out of seven alleles are defined as the same eBURST group.