Objective: To explore the effect of 6 common cytogenetic abnormalities on the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: Myeloma cells from a cohort of 532 newly-diagnosed MM patients enrolled were enriched by CD138 immunomagnetic beads, then detected 13q-, 17p-, 1q+, t (4;14), t (11;14) and t (14;16) and other common genetic abnormalities in MM by using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique to compare the influence of different genetic abnormalities on their prognoses. Results: The rate of cytogenetic abnormalities was 78.20% (416/532) in 532 patients, of which 13q-accounted for 42.29% (225/532), 17p-16.35% (87/532), 1q+ 53.38% (284/532), t (4;14) 25.94% (138/532), t (11;14) 21.62% (115/532), t (14;16) 2.07% (11/532). Six kinds of cytogenetic abnormalities were analyzed, 13q- and 17p-, 1q+, t (4; 14), t (14;16) were all correlated (P <0.05). The univariate analysis indicated that 13q-, 1q+, t (4;14) and t (14;16) had a significant effect on progression-free survival (PFS), 13q-, 17p-, t (4;14) and t (14;16) had a marked influence on overall survival (OS). The multivariate analysis showed that 1q+, t (4;14) and t (14;16) were independent adverse factors of PFS, 17p-, t (4;14) and t (14;16) were independent unfavorable factors of OS. According to the independent prognosis factors number-based groups, the median PFS with 0, 1, 2, 3 independent prognosis factors of patients were 30.9, 28.4, 18.7 and 17.6 months (P =0.035) respectively, and the median OS were 54.4, 46.1, 38.0 and 21.2 months (P =0.004) respectively. Conclusion: 1q+, 17p-, t (4;14) and t (14;16) were independent prognostic factors affecting the survival of MM patients. 13q-is often accompanied by 17p-, 1q + and (or) t (4;14) , simply 13q- was not an independent prognostic factor; the more number of independent prognostic factors, the worse the prognosis of patients.
Objective: To explore the effect of 6 common cytogenetic abnormalities on the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM). Methods:Myeloma cells from a cohort of 532 newly-diagnosed MMpatients enrolled were enriched by CD138 immunomagnetic beads, then detected 13q-, 17p-, 1q+, t (4;14), t (11;14) and t (14;16) and other common genetic abnormalities in MM by using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique to compare the influence of different genetic abnormalities on their prognoses. Results: The rate of cytogenetic abnormalities was 78.20% (416/532) in 532 patients, of which 13q-accounted for 42.29% (225/532), 17p-16.35% (87/532), 1q+ 53.38% (284/532), t (4;14) 25.94% (138/532), t (11;14) 21.62% (115/532), t (14;16) 2.07% (11/532). Six kinds of cytogenetic abnormalities were analyzed, 13q- and 17p-, 1q+, t (4; 14), t (14;16) were all correlated (P <0.05). The univariate analysis indicated that 13q-, 1q+, t (4;14) and t (14;16) had a significant effect on progression-free survival (PFS), 13q-, 17p-, t (4;14) and t (14;16) had a marked influence on overall survival (OS). The multivariate analysis showed that 1q+, t (4;14) and t (14;16) were independent adverse factors of PFS, 17p-, t (4;14) and t (14;16) were independent unfavorable factors of OS. According to the independent prognosis factors number-based groups, the median PFS with 0, 1, 2, 3 independent prognosis factors of patients were 30.9, 28.4, 18.7 and 17.6 months (P =0.035) respectively, and the median OS were 54.4, 46.1, 38.0 and 21.2 months (P =0.004) respectively. Conclusion: 1q+, 17p-, t (4;14) and t (14;16) were independent prognostic factors affecting the survival of MMpatients. 13q-is often accompanied by 17p-, 1q + and (or) t (4;14) , simply 13q- was not an independent prognostic factor; the more number of independent prognostic factors, the worse the prognosis of patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cytogenetics; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Multiple, myeloma; Prognosis
Authors: J J Hu; S M Nie; Y Gao; X S Yan; J X Huang; T L Li; S S Liu; C X Mao; J J Zhou; Y J Xu; W Wang; F J Meng; X Q Feng Journal: Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi Date: 2019-12-14
Authors: R F Yuan; Y J Dong; C R Li; W R Huang; L M Zhang; Q Zhu; L Xu; Y J Xu; Q Xu; G X Gao; F Y Jin Journal: Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi Date: 2020-01-14