A Boudewyns1, V Saldien2, P Van de Heyning3, S Verhulst4. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium. an.boudewyns@uza.be. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Adenotonsillectomy (AT) is the first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children irrespective of clinical upper airway (UA) findings. We aimed to investigate whether drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) changes treatment decision and outcome in otherwise healthy children and infants with OSA. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on polysomnography, DISE, and treatment in surgically naïve, otherwise healthy infants (n = 34) and children (n = 75) with OSA. Treatment success is defined as post-treatment obstructive apnea/hypopnea index (oAHI) < 5 h-5-1, and cure is defined as oAHI < 2 h-1. RESULTS: Based upon UA findings during DISE, AT was performed in 22 infants and 57 children. oAHI improved from 16.5 h-1 (8.1-28.3) to 0.8 h-1 (0.3-4.2) (p = 0.01) in infants and from 28.6 h-1 (23.4-34.9) to 0.7 h-1 (0.4-1.8) (p < 0.001) in children. AT was successful in 84.2% of infants and 91.4% of children. A cure was obtained in 68.4% of infants and 78.7% of children. DISE changed the treatment decision in 1/3rd of infants and 1/4th of children, and they did not undergo AT. In the non-AT group, isolated adenoidectomy/tonsillectomy or non-surgical treatment was successful in 86.6% of children and in 100% of infants. Cure was achieved in 66.6% of children and 75% of infants. CONCLUSIONS: DISE performed in otherwise healthy and surgically naïve infants and children with OSA altered the therapeutic decision making in up to 1/3rd to 1/4th of the cases and resulted in comparable treatment outcomes as standard treatment by AT. The present data suggest that DISE may provide individually tailored treatment of OSA in otherwise healthy infants and children.
PURPOSE: Adenotonsillectomy (AT) is the first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children irrespective of clinical upper airway (UA) findings. We aimed to investigate whether drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) changes treatment decision and outcome in otherwise healthy children and infants with OSA. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on polysomnography, DISE, and treatment in surgically naïve, otherwise healthy infants (n = 34) and children (n = 75) with OSA. Treatment success is defined as post-treatment obstructive apnea/hypopnea index (oAHI) < 5 h-5-1, and cure is defined as oAHI < 2 h-1. RESULTS: Based upon UA findings during DISE, AT was performed in 22 infants and 57 children. oAHI improved from 16.5 h-1 (8.1-28.3) to 0.8 h-1 (0.3-4.2) (p = 0.01) in infants and from 28.6 h-1 (23.4-34.9) to 0.7 h-1 (0.4-1.8) (p < 0.001) in children. AT was successful in 84.2% of infants and 91.4% of children. A cure was obtained in 68.4% of infants and 78.7% of children. DISE changed the treatment decision in 1/3rd of infants and 1/4th of children, and they did not undergo AT. In the non-AT group, isolated adenoidectomy/tonsillectomy or non-surgical treatment was successful in 86.6% of children and in 100% of infants. Cure was achieved in 66.6% of children and 75% of infants. CONCLUSIONS: DISE performed in otherwise healthy and surgically naïve infants and children with OSA altered the therapeutic decision making in up to 1/3rd to 1/4th of the cases and resulted in comparable treatment outcomes as standard treatment by AT. The present data suggest that DISE may provide individually tailored treatment of OSA in otherwise healthy infants and children.
Authors: Jeffrey B Gross; Kenneth L Bachenberg; Jonathan L Benumof; Robert A Caplan; Richard T Connis; Charles J Coté; David G Nickinovich; Vivek Prachand; Denham S Ward; Edward M Weaver; Lawrence Ydens; Song Yu Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: P Vairavan Manickam; Sally R Shott; Emily F Boss; Aliza P Cohen; Jareen K Meinzen-Derr; Raouf S Amin; Stacey L Ishman Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Carole L Marcus; Lee Jay Brooks; Kari A Draper; David Gozal; Ann Carol Halbower; Jacqueline Jones; Michael S Schechter; Sally Davidson Ward; Stephen Howard Sheldon; Richard N Shiffman; Christopher Lehmann; Karen Spruyt Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Carole L Marcus; Reneé H Moore; Carol L Rosen; Bruno Giordani; Susan L Garetz; H Gerry Taylor; Ron B Mitchell; Raouf Amin; Eliot S Katz; Raanan Arens; Shalini Paruthi; Hiren Muzumdar; David Gozal; Nina Hattiangadi Thomas; Janice Ware; Dean Beebe; Karen Snyder; Lisa Elden; Robert C Sprecher; Paul Willging; Dwight Jones; John P Bent; Timothy Hoban; Ronald D Chervin; Susan S Ellenberg; Susan Redline Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yoo Min Lee; Ben Kang; Yu Bin Kim; Hyun Jin Kim; Kyung Jae Lee; Yoon Lee; So Yoon Choi; Eun Hye Lee; Dae Yong Yi; Hyo Jeong Jang; You Jin Choi; Suk Jin Hong; Ju Young Kim; Yunkoo Kang; Soon Chul Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 2.153