Literature DB >> 29080853

Guidelines for performing systematic reviews in the development of toxicity factors.

Heather R Schaefer1, Jessica L Myers2.   

Abstract

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) developed guidance on conducting systematic reviews during the development of chemical-specific toxicity factors. Using elements from publicly available frameworks, the TCEQ systematic review process was developed in order to supplement the existing TCEQ Guidelines for developing toxicity factors (TCEQ Regulatory Guidance 442). The TCEQ systematic review process includes six steps: 1) Problem Formulation; 2) Systematic Literature Review and Study Selection; 3) Data Extraction; 4) Study Quality and Risk of Bias Assessment; 5) Evidence Integration and Endpoint Determination; and 6) Confidence Rating. This document provides guidance on conducting a systematic literature review and integrating evidence from different data streams when developing chemical-specific reference values (ReVs) and unit risk factors (URFs). However, this process can also be modified or expanded to address other questions that would benefit from systematic review practices. The systematic review and evidence integration framework can improve regulatory decision-making processes, increase transparency, minimize bias, improve consistency between different risk assessments, and further improve confidence in toxicity factor development.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Regulatory toxicology; Risk assessment; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29080853     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  4 in total

1.  Risk of Cancer for Workers Exposed to Antimony Compounds: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anton Saerens; Manosij Ghosh; Jelle Verdonck; Lode Godderis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Knowledge Organization Systems for Systematic Chemical Assessments.

Authors:  Paul Whaley; Stephen W Edwards; Andrew Kraft; Kate Nyhan; Andrew Shapiro; Sean Watford; Steve Wattam; Taylor Wolffe; Michelle Angrish
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  Development of the SciRAP Approach for Evaluating the Reliability and Relevance of in vitro Toxicity Data.

Authors:  Nicolas Roth; Johanna Zilliacus; Anna Beronius
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-15

4.  Software Tools to Facilitate Systematic Review Used for Cancer Hazard Identification.

Authors:  Andrew J Shapiro; Sébastien Antoni; Kathryn Z Guyton; Ruth M Lunn; Dana Loomis; Ivan Rusyn; Gloria D Jahnke; Pamela J Schwingl; Suril S Mehta; Josh Addington; Neela Guha
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.