Literature DB >> 29080301

Assessing uncertainties in crop and pasture ensemble model simulations of productivity and N2 O emissions.

Fiona Ehrhardt1, Jean-François Soussana1, Gianni Bellocchi2, Peter Grace3, Russel McAuliffe4, Sylvie Recous5, Renáta Sándor2,6, Pete Smith7, Val Snow4, Massimiliano de Antoni Migliorati3, Bruno Basso8, Arti Bhatia9, Lorenzo Brilli10, Jordi Doltra11, Christopher D Dorich12, Luca Doro13, Nuala Fitton7, Sandro J Giacomini14, Brian Grant15, Matthew T Harrison16, Stephanie K Jones17, Miko U F Kirschbaum18, Katja Klumpp2, Patricia Laville19, Joël Léonard20, Mark Liebig21, Mark Lieffering22, Raphaël Martin2, Raia S Massad19, Elizabeth Meier23, Lutz Merbold24,25, Andrew D Moore26, Vasileios Myrgiotis17, Paul Newton22, Elizabeth Pattey15, Susanne Rolinski27, Joanna Sharp28, Ward N Smith15, Lianhai Wu29, Qing Zhang30.   

Abstract

Simulation models are extensively used to predict agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions. However, the uncertainties of (reduced) model ensemble simulations have not been assessed systematically for variables affecting food security and climate change mitigation, within multi-species agricultural contexts. We report an international model comparison and benchmarking exercise, showing the potential of multi-model ensembles to predict productivity and nitrous oxide (N2 O) emissions for wheat, maize, rice and temperate grasslands. Using a multi-stage modelling protocol, from blind simulations (stage 1) to partial (stages 2-4) and full calibration (stage 5), 24 process-based biogeochemical models were assessed individually or as an ensemble against long-term experimental data from four temperate grassland and five arable crop rotation sites spanning four continents. Comparisons were performed by reference to the experimental uncertainties of observed yields and N2 O emissions. Results showed that across sites and crop/grassland types, 23%-40% of the uncalibrated individual models were within two standard deviations (SD) of observed yields, while 42 (rice) to 96% (grasslands) of the models were within 1 SD of observed N2 O emissions. At stage 1, ensembles formed by the three lowest prediction model errors predicted both yields and N2 O emissions within experimental uncertainties for 44% and 33% of the crop and grassland growth cycles, respectively. Partial model calibration (stages 2-4) markedly reduced prediction errors of the full model ensemble E-median for crop grain yields (from 36% at stage 1 down to 4% on average) and grassland productivity (from 44% to 27%) and to a lesser and more variable extent for N2 O emissions. Yield-scaled N2 O emissions (N2 O emissions divided by crop yields) were ranked accurately by three-model ensembles across crop species and field sites. The potential of using process-based model ensembles to predict jointly productivity and N2 O emissions at field scale is discussed.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agriculture; benchmarking; biogeochemical models; climate change; greenhouse gases; nitrous oxide; soil; yield

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29080301     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  9 in total

1.  Data-driven estimates of global nitrous oxide emissions from croplands.

Authors:  Qihui Wang; Feng Zhou; Ziyin Shang; Philippe Ciais; Wilfried Winiwarter; Robert B Jackson; Francesco N Tubiello; Greet Janssens-Maenhout; Hanqin Tian; Xiaoqing Cui; Josep G Canadell; Shilong Piao; Shu Tao
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 17.275

Review 2.  How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal.

Authors:  Pete Smith; Jean-Francois Soussana; Denis Angers; Louis Schipper; Claire Chenu; Daniel P Rasse; Niels H Batjes; Fenny van Egmond; Stephen McNeill; Matthias Kuhnert; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Jorgen E Olesen; Ngonidzashe Chirinda; Dario Fornara; Eva Wollenberg; Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes; Alberto Sanz-Cobena; Katja Klumpp
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 10.863

3.  Denitrifying pathways dominate nitrous oxide emissions from managed grassland during drought and rewetting.

Authors:  E Harris; E Diaz-Pines; E Stoll; M Schloter; S Schulz; C Duffner; K Li; K L Moore; J Ingrisch; D Reinthaler; S Zechmeister-Boltenstern; S Glatzel; N Brüggemann; M Bahn
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Simulating grazing beef and sheep systems.

Authors:  L Wu; P Harris; T H Misselbrook; M R F Lee
Journal:  Agric Syst       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.370

5.  Exploring the effects of land management change on productivity, carbon and nutrient balance: Application of an Ensemble Modelling Approach to the upper River Taw observatory, UK.

Authors:  Kirsty L Hassall; Kevin Coleman; Prakash N Dixit; Steve J Granger; Yusheng Zhang; Ryan T Sharp; Lianhai Wu; Andrew P Whitmore; Goetz M Richter; Adrian L Collins; Alice E Milne
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 10.753

6.  How Modelers Model: the Overlooked Social and Human Dimensions in Model Intercomparison Studies.

Authors:  Fabrizio Albanito; David McBey; Matthew Harrison; Pete Smith; Fiona Ehrhardt; Arti Bhatia; Gianni Bellocchi; Lorenzo Brilli; Marco Carozzi; Karen Christie; Jordi Doltra; Christopher Dorich; Luca Doro; Peter Grace; Brian Grant; Joël Léonard; Mark Liebig; Cameron Ludemann; Raphael Martin; Elizabeth Meier; Rachelle Meyer; Massimiliano De Antoni Migliorati; Vasileios Myrgiotis; Sylvie Recous; Renáta Sándor; Val Snow; Jean-François Soussana; Ward N Smith; Nuala Fitton
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 11.357

7.  Dynamic simulation of management events for assessing impacts of climate change on pre-alpine grassland productivity.

Authors:  Krischan Petersen; David Kraus; Pierluigi Calanca; Mikhail A Semenov; Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Ralf Kiese
Journal:  Eur J Agron       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.124

8.  To what extent is climate change adaptation a novel challenge for agricultural modellers?

Authors:  R P Kipling; C F E Topp; A Bannink; D J Bartley; I Blanco-Penedo; R Cortignani; A Del Prado; G Dono; P Faverdin; A-I Graux; N J Hutchings; L Lauwers; Ş Özkan Gülzari; P Reidsma; S Rolinski; M Ruiz-Ramos; D L Sandars; R Sándor; M Schönhart; G Seddaiu; J van Middelkoop; S Shrestha; I Weindl; V Eory
Journal:  Environ Model Softw       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.288

9.  Impact of extreme weather conditions on European crop production in 2018.

Authors:  Damien Beillouin; Bernhard Schauberger; Ana Bastos; Phillipe Ciais; David Makowski
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 6.237

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.