Hanna Aludden1, Anna Dahlin2, Thomas Starch-Jensen1, Christer Dahlin2,3, Arne Mordenfeld4,5,6. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 2. Department of Biomaterials, BIOMATCELL VINN Excellence Center, Institute for Surgical Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, NU-Hospital, Organization Trollhättan, Sweden. 4. Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle, Sweden. 5. Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Gävleborg County Council, Gävleborg, Sweden. 6. Plastic and Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the area fraction of different ratios of Bio-Oss® and bone, prior to grafting in an in vitro model to demonstrate a histomorphometric baseline. METHODS: Bio-Oss® particles were mixed with autogenous bone from pig jaw in three different ratios (50:50, 80:20 and 100:0) and packed in rice paper in a standardized procedure. Histomorphometric analyses were performed in 25 specimens and 74 regions of interest. The area percentage of Bio-Oss® , bone, and non-mineralized tissue (NMT) were calculated. Results were reported as mean values and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The mean area fraction of Bio-Oss® was 20.6% (CI: 18.2-23) in the 50:50 mixture, 33.6% (CI: 29.7-37.6) in the 80:20 mixture, and 43.4% (CI: 40.5-46.3) in the 100:0 mixture. The mean area fraction of NMT was 60.5% (CI: 57.9-63.1) in the 50:50 mixture, 59.6% (CI: 56.4-62.7) in the 80:20 mixture, and 56.6% (CI: 53.7-59.5) in the 100:0 mixture. The mean area fraction of bone was 18.9% (CI: 16.9-20.9) in the 50:50 mixture and 6.8% (CI: 5-8.6) in the 80:20 mixture. CONCLUSION: There is a great difference in the clinically estimated percentage and the histomorphometrically evaluated percentage of Bio-Oss® at baseline, prior to grafting. The area fraction of different tissues presented in this study may be beneficial as guidance for histomorphometrical baseline calculations when different mixtures of Bio-Oss® and autogenous bone are used as grafting materials.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the area fraction of different ratios of Bio-Oss® and bone, prior to grafting in an in vitro model to demonstrate a histomorphometric baseline. METHODS: Bio-Oss® particles were mixed with autogenous bone from pig jaw in three different ratios (50:50, 80:20 and 100:0) and packed in rice paper in a standardized procedure. Histomorphometric analyses were performed in 25 specimens and 74 regions of interest. The area percentage of Bio-Oss® , bone, and non-mineralized tissue (NMT) were calculated. Results were reported as mean values and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The mean area fraction of Bio-Oss® was 20.6% (CI: 18.2-23) in the 50:50 mixture, 33.6% (CI: 29.7-37.6) in the 80:20 mixture, and 43.4% (CI: 40.5-46.3) in the 100:0 mixture. The mean area fraction of NMT was 60.5% (CI: 57.9-63.1) in the 50:50 mixture, 59.6% (CI: 56.4-62.7) in the 80:20 mixture, and 56.6% (CI: 53.7-59.5) in the 100:0 mixture. The mean area fraction of bone was 18.9% (CI: 16.9-20.9) in the 50:50 mixture and 6.8% (CI: 5-8.6) in the 80:20 mixture. CONCLUSION: There is a great difference in the clinically estimated percentage and the histomorphometrically evaluated percentage of Bio-Oss® at baseline, prior to grafting. The area fraction of different tissues presented in this study may be beneficial as guidance for histomorphometrical baseline calculations when different mixtures of Bio-Oss® and autogenous bone are used as grafting materials.
Authors: Matheus Afm Santos; Daniela N Silva; Karla Rovaris; Frederico B Sousa; Eugenia LA Dantas; Lucas A Loureiro; Thiago M C Pereira; Silvana S Meyrelles; Rossiene M Bertollo; Elisardo C Vasquez Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-02-25 Impact factor: 4.566