Literature DB >> 29080242

Can negligible hepatic steatosis determined by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction obviate the need for liver biopsy in potential liver donors?

Janakan Satkunasingham1, Hooman Hosseini Nik1, Sandra Fischer2, Ravi Menezes1, Nazia Selzner3, Mark Cattral4, David Grant4, Kartik Jhaveri1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine whether magnetic resonance (MR)-proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimate of negligible hepatic fat percentage (<5%) can exclude significant hepatic steatosis (≥10%) in living liver donor candidates obviating the need for liver biopsy and to perform intraindividual comparisons between MR-PDFF techniques for hepatic steatosis quantification. In an ethics-approved retrospective study, 144 liver donor candidates with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and 6-echo Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between 2013 and 2015 were included. A subset of 32 candidates underwent liver biopsy. Hepatic fat percentage was determined using MR-PDFF and histopathology-determined fat fraction as the reference standard. A receiver operating characteristic analysis with positive predictive value, negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity was performed to discriminate between clinically significant steatosis (≥10%) or not (<10%) at MRS-PDFF and MRI-PDFF thresholds of 5% and 10%. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses between MRS-PDFF and MRI-PDFF were performed for intraindividual comparison of hepatic steatosis estimation. There was significant association between MRS-PDFF and MRI-PDFF with HP-FP. High NPV of 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78%-99%) and 100% (95% CI, 76%-100%) as well as an area under the curve of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.79-1.0) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.84-1.0) were obtained with a cutoff threshold of 5% MRI-PDFF and MRS-PDFF, respectively, to exclude clinically significant steatosis (≥10%). Intraindividual comparison between MRS-PDFF and MRI-PDFF showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.83. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 1% with 95% limits of agreement between -1% and 3%. MR-PDFF estimate of negligible hepatic fat percentage (<5%) has sufficient NPV for excluding clinically significant hepatic steatosis (≥10%) in living liver donor candidates obviating the need for liver biopsy. It may be sufficient to acquire only the multiecho Dixon MRI-PDFF for hepatic steatosis estimation. Liver Transplantation 24 470-477 2018 AASLD.
© 2017 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29080242     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  10 in total

Review 1.  CT and MR imaging evaluation of living liver donors.

Authors:  Federica Vernuccio; Susan A Whitney; Kadiyala Ravindra; Daniele Marin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-01

Review 2.  Noninvasive imaging biomarker assessment of liver fibrosis by elastography in NAFLD.

Authors:  Elliot B Tapper; Rohit Loomba
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Liver fat imaging-a clinical overview of ultrasound, CT, and MR imaging.

Authors:  Yingzhen N Zhang; Kathryn J Fowler; Gavin Hamilton; Jennifer Y Cui; Ethan Z Sy; Michelle Balanay; Jonathan C Hooker; Nikolaus Szeverenyi; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Peri-transplant management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in liver transplant candidates .

Authors:  Naga Swetha Samji; Rajiv Heda; Sanjaya K Satapathy
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-01-05

5.  A pilot study of ex-vivo MRI-PDFF of donor livers for assessment of steatosis and predicting early graft dysfunction.

Authors:  Sanjaya K Satapathy; Humberto C Gonzalez; Jason Vanatta; Andrew Dyer; Wesley Angel; Simonne S Nouer; Mehmet Kocak; Satish K Kedia; Yu Jiang; Ian Clark; Nour Yadak; Nosratollah Nezakagtoo; Ryan Helmick; Peter Horton; Luis Campos; Uchenna Agbim; Benedict Maliakkal; Daniel Maluf; Satheesh Nair; Hollis H Halford; James D Eason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Validation of Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging Methods (Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Fat Fraction Calculation and Computed Tomography (CT) Liver Attenuation Index) for Hepatic Graft Fat Quantification in Living Liver Transplant Donors.

Authors:  Abhideep Chaudhary; Gaurav Sood; Niteen Kumar; Chandraprakash Chauhan; Dhirendra Pratap Singh Yadav; Vivek Kasana; Raman Arora; Gaurav Gangwani
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 1.530

7.  Evaluation of a Whole-Liver Dixon-Based MRI Approach for Quantification of Liver Fat in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Two Isocaloric Different Diets.

Authors:  Valentina Brancato; Giuseppe Della Pepa; Lutgarda Bozzetto; Marilena Vitale; Giovanni Annuzzi; Luca Basso; Carlo Cavaliere; Marco Salvatore; Angela Albarosa Rivellese; Serena Monti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-16

8.  Lose Weight to Donate: Development of a Program to Optimize Potential Donors With Hepatic Steatosis or Obesity for Living Liver Donation.

Authors:  John T Rose; Paola Vargas; Tara Seay; Arthur J Pesch; Tessa Williams; Anita Sites; Zachary Henry; Patrick G Northup; Shawn J Pelletier; Jose Oberholzer; Curtis K Argo; Nicolas Goldaracena
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-05-25

Review 9.  Mechanisms of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and implications for surgery.

Authors:  Ariel E Feldstein; Daniel Hartmann; Benedikt Kaufmann; Agustina Reca; Baocai Wang; Helmut Friess
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 10.  Advances in liver US, CT, and MRI: moving toward the future.

Authors:  Federica Vernuccio; Roberto Cannella; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Massimo Galia; An Tang; Giuseppe Brancatelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2021-12-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.