Literature DB >> 29079463

A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Effect of Ulipristal Acetate during Myomectomy.

Ally Murji1, Marta Wais2, Sabrina Lee3, Alice Pham4, Melissa Tai5, Grace Liu6.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical experience at myomectomy between patients with myomas pretreated with ulipristal acetate versus no pretreatment.
DESIGN: A prospective, observational, multicenter study of myomectomy procedures by any route (hysteroscopic, laparoscopic, or laparotomy) (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: Five university-affiliated hospitals including tertiary care and community sites. PATIENTS: Any patient who underwent hysteroscopic, laparotomic, or laparoscopic myomectomy regardless of medical pretreatment.
INTERVENTIONS: Surgeons completed a Web-based questionnaire after each myomectomy procedure. Surgeons evaluated visualization, the myoma-myometrium relationship, extrusion, fluid deficit, blood loss, and overall ease of hysteroscopic myomectomies. For laparotomic/laparoscopic myomectomies, plane delineation, myoma separation, blood loss, and overall ease were assessed. The total surgical experience score was calculated by summing the values for each subscale.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 309 myomectomies were evaluated by 52 surgeons (response rate = 83%) at 5 institutions. Of 140 hysteroscopic myomectomies, 84 (60%) were performed without pretreatment, 29 (21%) after ulipristal acetate pretreatment, and 27 (19%) after pretreatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/other. Of 169 laparotomic/laparoscopic myomectomies, 104 (62%) were performed without pretreatment, 46 (27%) after ulipristal acetate, and 19 (11%) after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/other. The mean surgical experience score (±standard deviation) was comparable between the no pretreatment and ulipristal acetate groups for hysteroscopic myomectomies (13.8 ± 2.2 vs 13.3 ± 2.2, p = .35) and laparotomic/laparoscopic myomectomies (12.9 ± 4.1 vs 12.1 ± 4.2, p = .30). Compared with no pretreatment, more laparotomic/laparoscopic myomectomies after ulipristal acetate pretreatment were associated with difficult delineation of surgical planes (22 [47.8%] vs 23 [22.1%], p = .002) and difficult myoma separation (20 [43.5%] vs 21 [20.2%], p = .003). More myomas were described as soft with ulipristal acetate pretreatment (14 [30.4%] vs 17 [16.4%], p = .049). The rates of profuse/abundant endometrium during hysteroscopy were similar between the no pretreatment (21 [25.0%]) and ulipristal acetate (7 [24.1%], p = .93) groups.
CONCLUSION: Despite differences in surgical nuances, the overall myomectomy experience was not negatively affected by ulipristal acetate pretreatment.
Copyright © 2017 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myomectomy; Ulipristal acetate; Uterine myomas

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29079463     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  5 in total

1.  What happens after randomised controlled trials? Uterine fibroids and ulipristal acetate: systematic review and meta-analysis of "real-world" data.

Authors:  Neha Shah; Elizabeth Egbase; Michael Sideris; Funlayo Odejinmi
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  The Use of Ulipristal Acetate (Esmya) Prior to Laparoscopic Myomectomy: Help or Hindrance?

Authors:  Rebecca Mallick; Sam Oxley; Funlayo Odejinmi
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2019-04-29

3.  Ulipristal acetate vs gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to laparoscopic myomectomy (MYOMEX trial): Short-term results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Inge de Milliano; Judith A F Huirne; Andreas L Thurkow; Celine Radder; Marlies Y Bongers; Huib van Vliet; Jonas van de Lande; Peter M van de Ven; Wouter J K Hehenkamp
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Use of a microsurgical vascular clip system for temporary bilateral occlusion of the four main uterine vessels for laparoscopic enucleation of very large intramural uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Shadi Younes; Marc Radosa; Achim Schneider; Julia Radosa; Alexey Eichenwald; Christiane Weisgerber; Bahriye Aktas
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 5.  Focus on the Primary Prevention of Intrauterine Adhesions: Current Concept and Vision.

Authors:  Wen-Ling Lee; Chia-Hao Liu; Min Cheng; Wen-Hsun Chang; Wei-Min Liu; Peng-Hui Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.