Literature DB >> 29079458

Bilateral extracephalic transcranial direct current stimulation improves endurance performance in healthy individuals.

L Angius1, A R Mauger2, J Hopker1, A Pascual-Leone3, E Santarnecchi4, S M Marcora1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to enhance endurance performance but its precise mechanisms and effects remain unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of bilateral tDCS on neuromuscular function and performance during a cycling time to task failure (TTF) test.
METHODS: Twelve participants in randomized order received a placebo tDCS (SHAM) or real tDCS with two cathodes (CATHODAL) or two anodes (ANODAL) over bilateral motor cortices and the opposite electrode pair over the ipsilateral shoulders. Each session lasted 10 min and current was set at 2 mA. Neuromuscular assessment was performed before and after tDCS and was followed by a cycling time to task failure (TTF) test. Heart rate (HR), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), leg muscle pain (PAIN) and blood lactate accumulation (ΔB[La-]) in response to the cycling TTF test were measured.
RESULTS: Corticospinal excitability increased in the ANODAL condition (P < 0.001) while none of the other neuromuscular parameters showed any change. Neuromuscular parameters did not change in the SHAM and CATHODAL conditions. TTF was significantly longer in the ANODAL (P = 0.003) compared to CATHODAL and SHAM conditions (12.61 ± 4.65 min; 10.61 ± 4.34 min; 10.21 ± 3.47 min respectively), with significantly lower RPE and higher ΔB[La-] (P < 0.001). No differences between conditions were found for HR (P = 0.803) and PAIN during the cycling TTF test (P = 0.305).
CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that tDCS with the anode over both motor cortices using a bilateral extracephalic reference improves endurance performance.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endurance performance; Fatigue; Perception of effort; tDCS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29079458      PMCID: PMC6298602          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  51 in total

Review 1.  Exercise and pain: the neurobiology, measurement, and laboratory study of pain in relation to exercise in humans.

Authors:  P J O'Connor; D B Cook
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Perception of effort reflects central motor command during movement execution.

Authors:  Helma M de Morree; Christoph Klein; Samuele M Marcora
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  Descending pathways in motor control.

Authors:  Roger N Lemon
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 4.  Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Charlotte J Stagg; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.519

5.  The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation.

Authors:  Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda; Abeye Mekonnen; Ricardo Salvador; Giulio Ruffini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation alters elbow flexor muscle recruitment strategies.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Rajiv Ranganathan; Shailesh S Kantak; Yasin Y Dhaher; William Z Rymer
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  Reliability of power in physical performance tests.

Authors:  W G Hopkins; E J Schabort; J A Hawley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Improved isometric force endurance after transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortical areas.

Authors:  F Cogiamanian; S Marceglia; G Ardolino; S Barbieri; A Priori
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Enhancement of pinch force in the lower leg by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Satoshi Tanaka; Takashi Hanakawa; Manabu Honda; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Modulation of cold pain perception by transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Ali Zandieh; Seyed Ehsan Parhizgar; Mohammad Fakhri; Mohammad Taghvaei; Shahin Miri; Alireza Shahbabaie; Sadaf Esteghamati; Hamed Ekhtiari
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-12-14
View more
  27 in total

1.  Remote muscle priming anodal transcranial direct current stimulation attenuates short interval intracortical inhibition and increases time to task failure of a constant workload cycling exercise.

Authors:  Simranjit K Sidhu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation does not influence the neural adjustments associated with fatiguing contractions in a hand muscle.

Authors:  Achraf Abdelmoula; Stéphane Baudry; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Does the transcranial direct current stimulation improve dual-task postural control in young healthy adults?

Authors:  Noëmie Pineau; Alison Robin; Samuel Bulteau; Véronique Thomas-Ollivier; Anne Sauvaget; Thibault Deschamps
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2020-10-30

4.  Increased leg muscle fatigability during 2 mA and 4 mA transcranial direct current stimulation over the left motor cortex.

Authors:  Craig D Workman; John Kamholz; Thorsten Rudroff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Bruce Luber; Anna-Katharine Brem; Marom Bikson; Andre R Brunoni; Roi Cohen Kadosh; Veljko Dubljević; Shirley Fecteau; Florinda Ferreri; Agnes Flöel; Mark Hallett; Roy H Hamilton; Christoph S Herrmann; Michal Lavidor; Collen Loo; Caroline Lustenberger; Sergio Machado; Carlo Miniussi; Vera Moliadze; Michael A Nitsche; Simone Rossi; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Margitta Seeck; Gregor Thut; Zsolt Turi; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Nicole Wenderoth; Anna Wexler; Ulf Ziemann; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2022-05-25

6.  Transcranial direct current stimulation improves quality of life and physical fitness in diabetic polyneuropathy: a pilot double blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galeno Ferreira; Edson Silva-Filho; Antônio de Oliveira; Clemilda de Lucena; Johnnatas Lopes; Rodrigo Pegado
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2020-03-14

7.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on post-stroke fatigue.

Authors:  William De Doncker; Sasha Ondobaka; Annapoorna Kuppuswamy
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Different Effects of 2 mA and 4 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Muscle Activity and Torque in a Maximal Isokinetic Fatigue Task.

Authors:  Craig David Workman; Alexandra C Fietsam; Thorsten Rudroff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Effects of Bilateral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Simultaneous Bimanual Handgrip Strength.

Authors:  Mikito Hikosaka; Yu Aramaki
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Psychophysiological Responses to Maximal Incremental Exercise Test in Recreational Endurance Runners.

Authors:  Carlo Baldari; Cosme F Buzzachera; Marcelo Vitor-Costa; Juliano M Gabardo; Andrea G Bernardes; Leandro R Altimari; Laura Guidetti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.