Tomoko Ishizu1, Yoshihiro Seo2, Akiko Atsumi3, Yumiko Oishi Tanaka4, Masayoshi Yamamoto3, Tomoko Machino-Ohtsuka3, Hitoshi Horigome5, Kazutaka Aonuma3, Yasushi Kawakami1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. 2. Cardiovascular Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. Electronic address: yo-seo@md.tsukuba.ac.jp. 3. Cardiovascular Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. 4. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. 5. Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of global and regional right ventricular (RV) systolic function is challenging. The aims of this study were to confirm the reliability and feasibility of a three-dimensional (3D) speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) system, using comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), and to assess the contribution of regional RV function to global function. METHODS: In a retrospective, cross-sectional study setting, RV volumetric data were studied in 106 patients who were referred for both CMR and 3D echocardiography within 1 month. Three-dimensional STE-derived area strain, longitudinal strain, and circumferential strain were assessed as global, inlet, outflow, apical, and septal segments. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (70%) had adequate 3D echocardiographic data. RV measurements derived from 3D STE and CMR were closely related (RV end-diastolic volume, R2 = 0.84; RV end-systolic volume, R2 = 0.83; RV ejection fraction [RVEF], R2 = 0.70; P < .001 for all). RVEF and RV end-diastolic volume from 3D STE were slightly but significantly smaller than CMR values (mean differences, -2% and -10 mL for RVEF and RV end-diastolic volume, respectively). Among conventional echocardiographic parameters for RV function (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, fractional area change, S' of the tricuspid annulus, RV free wall two-dimensional longitudinal strain), only fractional area change was significantly related to RVEF (r = 0.34, P = .003). Among segmental 3D strain variables, inlet area strain (r = -0.56, P < .001) and outflow circumferential strain (r = -0.42, P < .001) were independent factors associated with CMR-derived RVEF. CONCLUSIONS: RV volume and RVEF determined by 3D STE were comparable with CMR measurements. Regional RV wall motion showed that heterogeneous segmental deformations affect global RV function differently; specifically, inlet area strain and outflow circumferential strain were significant factors associated with RVEF in patients with underlying heart diseases.
BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of global and regional right ventricular (RV) systolic function is challenging. The aims of this study were to confirm the reliability and feasibility of a three-dimensional (3D) speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) system, using comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), and to assess the contribution of regional RV function to global function. METHODS: In a retrospective, cross-sectional study setting, RV volumetric data were studied in 106 patients who were referred for both CMR and 3D echocardiography within 1 month. Three-dimensional STE-derived area strain, longitudinal strain, and circumferential strain were assessed as global, inlet, outflow, apical, and septal segments. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (70%) had adequate 3D echocardiographic data. RV measurements derived from 3D STE and CMR were closely related (RV end-diastolic volume, R2 = 0.84; RV end-systolic volume, R2 = 0.83; RV ejection fraction [RVEF], R2 = 0.70; P < .001 for all). RVEF and RV end-diastolic volume from 3D STE were slightly but significantly smaller than CMR values (mean differences, -2% and -10 mL for RVEF and RV end-diastolic volume, respectively). Among conventional echocardiographic parameters for RV function (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, fractional area change, S' of the tricuspid annulus, RV free wall two-dimensional longitudinal strain), only fractional area change was significantly related to RVEF (r = 0.34, P = .003). Among segmental 3D strain variables, inlet area strain (r = -0.56, P < .001) and outflow circumferential strain (r = -0.42, P < .001) were independent factors associated with CMR-derived RVEF. CONCLUSIONS: RV volume and RVEF determined by 3D STE were comparable with CMR measurements. Regional RV wall motion showed that heterogeneous segmental deformations affect global RV function differently; specifically, inlet area strain and outflow circumferential strain were significant factors associated with RVEF in patients with underlying heart diseases.
Authors: Marius Keller; Tobias Lang; Andreas Schilling; Martina Nowak-Machen; Peter Rosenberger; Harry Magunia Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Jiwon Kim; Javid Alakbarli; Brian Yum; Nathan H Tehrani; Meridith P Pollie; Christiane Abouzeid; Antonino Di Franco; Mark B Ratcliffe; Athena Poppas; Robert A Levine; Richard B Devereux; Jonathan W Weinsaft Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Marius Keller; Marcia-Marleen Duerr; Tim Heller; Andreas Koerner; Christian Schlensak; Peter Rosenberger; Harry Magunia Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-03-22