Literature DB >> 29078942

Elective Induction of Labor: What is the Impact?

Sarah E Little1.   

Abstract

Elective induction of labor (ie, without a maternal or fetal indication) is common in the United States. When using the correct comparison group (elective induction vs expectant management) induction is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. Moreover, elective induction after 39 weeks seems to have maternal benefits (eg, lower infection rates) as well as a reduction in neonatal morbidity and the potential for a decrease in term stillbirth. However, these risks, especially stillbirth, are low in a healthy cohort and there are potential negative impacts on maternal satisfaction, breastfeeding, and cost/resource use that must be considered.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cesarean delivery; Elective induction; Induction of labor; Non–medically indicated induction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29078942     DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8545            Impact factor:   2.844


  5 in total

1.  Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Howard Hao Lee; Ben-Shian Huang; Min Cheng; Chang-Ching Yeh; I-Chia Lin; Huann-Cheng Horng; Hsin-Yi Huang; Wen-Ling Lee; Peng-Hui Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Immunobiology of Cervix Ripening.

Authors:  Steven M Yellon
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Comparing the effectiveness and safety of Dinoprostone vaginal insert and double-balloon catheter as cervical ripening treatments in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Jinjing Yan; Baomin Yin; Hanghang Lv
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-09

4.  Clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates: Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Aireen Wingert; Lisa Hartling; Meghan Sebastianski; Cydney Johnson; Robin Featherstone; Ben Vandermeer; R Douglas Wilson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Maternal perceptions of the experience of attempted labor induction and medically elective inductions: analysis of survey results from listening to mothers in California.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Ronald Iverson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.