Literature DB >> 29078917

The impact of the robotic platform on assistant variability in complex gastrointestinal surgery.

Maureen D Moore1, Cheguevera Afaneh1, Katherine D Gray1, Suraj Panjwani1, Thomas J Fahey1, Alfons Pomp1, Rasa Zarnegar2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nissen fundoplication is considered an advanced minimally invasive procedure whether performed laparoscopically or robotically. In laparoscopic surgery, it is evident that assistant skill level impacts operative times. However, the robotic platform allows improved surgeon autonomy. We aimed to determine the impact of assistant training level on operative times in robotic Nissen fundoplication (RNF) and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF).
METHODS: A prospectively maintained Nissen database (2011-2016) from a single academic institution was utilized to collect patient characteristics, operative times, length of stay, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, readmission rate, and assistant training level. Assistants were either postgraduate year-3 surgery residents defined as junior-level assistants or a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellow defined as senior-level assistants.
RESULTS: There were 105 patients included in our analyses. When comparing postgraduate year-3 residents to MIS fellows performing LNF, the median operative time was significantly decreased when senior-level assistants were present in the LNF group, 85 (75-103) versus 129 (74-269) min, P = 0.02. In comparison, median operative times in the RNF group were independent of the assistant's level of training, 154 (71-300) versus 158 (101-215) min, P = 0.34. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the junior- and senior-level assistant cohorts for estimated blood loss, length of stay, postoperative complications, and 30-d readmission rates in either the LNF or RNF group.
CONCLUSIONS: Assistant training level impacted operative time for LNF but not RNF. These differences are most likely attributed to increased autonomy of the operating surgeon afforded by the robotic platform reducing assistant variability.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antireflux; Assistance; Nissen fundoplication; Robot; Training level

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29078917     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  2 in total

1.  Robotic Reoperative Anti-reflux Surgery: Low Perioperative Morbidity and High Symptom Resolution.

Authors:  Adham Elmously; Katherine D Gray; Timothy M Ullmann; Thomas J Fahey; Cheguevara Afaneh; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  A systematic review of robot-assisted anti-reflux surgery to examine reporting standards.

Authors:  Marc M Huttman; Harry F Robertson; Alexander N Smith; Sarah E Biggs; Ffion Dewi; Lauren K Dixon; Emily N Kirkham; Conor S Jones; Jozel Ramirez; Darren L Scroggie; Benjamin E Zucker; Samir Pathak; Natalie S Blencowe
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-09-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.