Teresa C Rice1, Amanda M Pugh1, Aaron P Seitz1, Erich Gulbins2, Vanessa Nomellini3, Charles C Caldwell4. 1. Division of Research, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. 2. Division of Research, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Molecular Biology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. 3. Division of Research, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. Electronic address: vanessa.nomellini@uc.edu. 4. Division of Research, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. Electronic address: charles.caldwell@uc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacterial lung infection is a leading cause of death for those 65 y or older, often requiring intensive care unit admission and mechanical ventilation, which consumes considerable health care resources. Although administration of antibiotics is the standard of care for bacterial pneumonia, its overuse has led to the emergence of multidrug resistant organisms. Therefore, alternative strategies to help minimize the effects of bacterial pneumonia in the elderly are necessary. As studies have shown that sphingosine (SPH) has inherent bacterial killing properties, our goal was to assess whether it could act as a prophylactic treatment to protect aged mice from pulmonary infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: Aged (51 wk) and young (8 wk) C57Bl/6 mice were used in this study. Pulmonary SPH levels were determined by histology. SPH content of microparticles was quantified using a SPH kinase assay. Pneumonia was induced by intranasally treating mice with 106 Colony Forming Unit (CFU) P aeruginosa. Microparticles were isolated from young mice, whereas some were further incubated with SPH. RESULTS: We observed that SPH levels are reduced in the bronchial epithelial cells as well as the bronchoalveolar lavage microparticles isolated from aged mice, which correlates with a susceptibility to infection. We demonstrate that SPH or microparticle treatment can protect aged mice from pulmonary P aeruginosa infection. Finally, we observed that enriching microparticles with SPH before treatment eliminated the bacterial load in P aeruginosa-infected aged mice. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that prophylactic treatment with SPH could reduce lung bacterial infections for the at-risk elderly population.
BACKGROUND:Bacterial lung infection is a leading cause of death for those 65 y or older, often requiring intensive care unit admission and mechanical ventilation, which consumes considerable health care resources. Although administration of antibiotics is the standard of care for bacterial pneumonia, its overuse has led to the emergence of multidrug resistant organisms. Therefore, alternative strategies to help minimize the effects of bacterial pneumonia in the elderly are necessary. As studies have shown that sphingosine (SPH) has inherent bacterial killing properties, our goal was to assess whether it could act as a prophylactic treatment to protect aged mice from pulmonary infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: Aged (51 wk) and young (8 wk) C57Bl/6 mice were used in this study. Pulmonary SPH levels were determined by histology. SPH content of microparticles was quantified using a SPH kinase assay. Pneumonia was induced by intranasally treating mice with 106 Colony Forming Unit (CFU) P aeruginosa. Microparticles were isolated from young mice, whereas some were further incubated with SPH. RESULTS: We observed that SPH levels are reduced in the bronchial epithelial cells as well as the bronchoalveolar lavage microparticles isolated from aged mice, which correlates with a susceptibility to infection. We demonstrate that SPH or microparticle treatment can protect aged mice from pulmonary P aeruginosa infection. Finally, we observed that enriching microparticles with SPH before treatment eliminated the bacterial load in P aeruginosa-infected aged mice. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that prophylactic treatment with SPH could reduce lung bacterial infections for the at-risk elderly population.
Authors: Grace E Martin; Ryan M Boudreau; Caroline Couch; Katrin Anne Becker; Michael J Edwards; Charles C Caldwell; Erich Gulbins; Aaron Seitz Journal: Biochimie Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 4.079
Authors: Teresa C Rice; Aaron P Seitz; Michael J Edwards; Erich Gulbins; Charles C Caldwell Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: Anne Gulbins; Heike Grassmé; Richard Hoehn; Barbara Wilker; Matthias Soddemann; Marcus Kohnen; Michael J Edwards; Johannes Kornhuber; Erich Gulbins Journal: Cell Physiol Biochem Date: 2016-08-01
Authors: S L Schissel; X Jiang; J Tweedie-Hardman; T Jeong; E H Camejo; J Najib; J H Rapp; K J Williams; I Tabas Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1998-01-30 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Volker Teichgräber; Martina Ulrich; Nicole Endlich; Joachim Riethmüller; Barbara Wilker; Cheyla Conceição De Oliveira-Munding; Anna M van Heeckeren; Mark L Barr; Gabriele von Kürthy; Kurt W Schmid; Michael Weller; Burkhard Tümmler; Florian Lang; Heike Grassme; Gerd Döring; Erich Gulbins Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-03-30 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Sascha Beck; Carolin Sehl; Sylvia Voortmann; Hedda Luise Verhasselt; Michael J Edwards; Jan Buer; Mike Hasenberg; Erich Gulbins; Katrin Anne Becker Journal: J Mol Med (Berl) Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Alhaji H Janneh; Mohamed Faisal Kassir; Connor J Dwyer; Paramita Chakraborty; Jason S Pierce; Patrick A Flume; Hong Li; Satish N Nadig; Shikhar Mehrotra; Besim Ogretmen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 4.379