Literature DB >> 29078692

Robotic lobectomy.

Paul Linsky1, Benjamin Wei2.   

Abstract

Lobectomy is still currently the gold standard for treatment of lung cancer. With the great advancement of robotic surgery, robotic lobectomy has been demonstrated to be an operation that is safe and can be done in a timely manner, similar to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Additionally, reports show that long-term oncologic outcomes for robotic lobectomy are consistent with those reported for VATS and open lobectomy. Patients are selected in the same manner as those for VATS. Improved optics, increased dexterity of the instruments, and better ergonomics can yield subjective advantages to the surgeon. The techniques of port placement, mediastinal lymph node dissection and the steps of each of the five lobectomies are important and described in the chapter, for both the da Vinci Si and da Vinci Xi platforms. The subtle differences are highlighted. Additionally, advantages of the platforms are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic; lobectomy; lung cancer; lung resection; minimally invasive

Year:  2017        PMID: 29078692      PMCID: PMC5638995          DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2017.08.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Surg        ISSN: 2221-2965


  15 in total

1.  Robot-assisted lobectomy.

Authors:  Robert C Ashton; Cliff P Connery; Daniel G Swistel; Joseph J DeRose
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms.

Authors:  Robert J Cerfolio; Ayesha S Bryant; Loki Skylizard; Douglas James Minnich
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Defining the cost of care for lobectomy and segmentectomy: a comparison of open, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and robotic approaches.

Authors:  Shaun A Deen; Jennifer L Wilson; Candice L Wilshire; Eric Vallières; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Robson E Ely; Brian E Louie
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with acceptable morbidity and mortality in patients with predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second or diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide less than 40% of normal.

Authors:  Bryan M Burt; Andrzej S Kosinski; Joseph B Shrager; Mark W Onaitis; Tracey Weigel
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Robotic lobectomy can be taught while maintaining quality patient outcomes.

Authors:  Robert J Cerfolio; Kyle H Cichos; Benjamin Wei; Douglas J Minnich
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): long-term oncologic results.

Authors:  Bernard J Park; Franca Melfi; Alfredo Mussi; Patrick Maisonneuve; Lorenzo Spaggiari; Ruy Kuenzer Caetano Da Silva; Giulia Veronesi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from a multihospital database (Premier).

Authors:  Scott J Swanson; Daniel L Miller; Robert Joseph McKenna; John Howington; M Blair Marshall; Andrew C Yoo; Matthew Moore; Candace L Gunnarsson; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database.

Authors:  Michael Kent; Thomas Wang; Richard Whyte; Thomas Curran; Raja Flores; Sidhu Gangadharan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Incidence, Results, and Our Current Intraoperative Technique to Control Major Vascular Injuries During Minimally Invasive Robotic Thoracic Surgery.

Authors:  Robert J Cerfolio; Kyle M Bess; Benjamin Wei; Douglas J Minnich
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Comparison of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Robotic Approaches for Clinical Stage I and Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.

Authors:  Brian E Louie; Jennifer L Wilson; Sunghee Kim; Robert J Cerfolio; Bernard J Park; Alexander S Farivar; Eric Vallières; Ralph W Aye; William R Burfeind; Mark I Block
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  2 in total

1.  Robotic total knee arthroplasty: clinical outcomes and directions for future research.

Authors:  B Kayani; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.853

2.  Report on 153 sequential three-incision robotic-assisted pulmonary resections by a single surgeon: technical details and learning curve.

Authors:  Muyun Peng; Xiang Wang; Chen Chen; Sichuang Tan; Wenliang Liu; Fenglei Yu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.005

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.