| Literature DB >> 29078391 |
Luca Carraro1, Enrico Bertuzzo2, Lorenzo Mari3, Inês Fontes4, Hanna Hartikainen4,5, Nicole Strepparava6, Heike Schmidt-Posthaus6, Thomas Wahli6, Jukka Jokela4,5, Marino Gatto3, Andrea Rinaldo1,7.
Abstract
Proliferative kidney disease (PKD) is a major threat to wild and farmed salmonid populations because of its lethal effect at high water temperatures. Its causative agent, the myxozoan Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae, has a complex lifecycle exploiting freshwater bryozoans as primary hosts and salmonids as secondary hosts. We carried out an integrated study of PKD in a prealpine Swiss river (the Wigger). During a 3-year period, data on fish abundance, disease prevalence, concentration of primary hosts' DNA in environmental samples [environmental DNA (eDNA)], hydrological variables, and water temperatures gathered at various locations within the catchment were integrated into a newly developed metacommunity model, which includes ecological and epidemiological dynamics of fish and bryozoans, connectivity effects, and hydrothermal drivers. Infection dynamics were captured well by the epidemiological model, especially with regard to the spatial prevalence patterns. PKD prevalence in the sampled sites for both young-of-the-year (YOY) and adult brown trout attained 100% at the end of summer, while seasonal population decay was higher in YOY than in adults. We introduce a method based on decay distance of eDNA signal predicting local species' density, accounting for variation in environmental drivers (such as morphology and geology). The model provides a whole-network overview of the disease prevalence. In this study, we show how spatial and environmental characteristics of river networks can be used to study epidemiology and disease dynamics of waterborne diseases.Entities:
Keywords: climate change; eDNA; metacommunity framework; parasite–host interactions; waterborne epidemic
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29078391 PMCID: PMC5692590 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1713691114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Overview of the study area and data. (A) Digital terrain model of the Wigger and extracted river network with location of the sampling sites. Site numbers are introduced by the number sign (#). (B) Position of the Wigger catchment in Switzerland. (C) Mean measured F. sultana eDNA concentration. Ungauged stretches are depicted in blue. (D) Results of fish sampling campaign on site 8 in 2015. The reader is referred to for the complete dataset. (E) Geological characterization of the catchment.
Fig. 2.Results from the bryozoan habitat suitability study. (A) Occurrence of covariates in behavioral models. “Positive” and “negative” refer to the signs of the calibrated coefficients. Covariates’ abbreviations are as in . GeoAll, percentage of alluvial rocks; GeoMrn, percentage of moraines; GeoWat, percentage of superficial water; LocMwt, local mean water temperature; LocSlp, local slope; UpCAr, contributing area; UpElv, upstream mean elevation. (B) Distribution of calibrated values of in behavioral models. (C) Map of local eDNA concentration obtained by averaging results from all behavioral models. (D) Modeled () vs. observed () F. sultana eDNA concentration. Red lines identify 10th–90th percentile ranges of the distribution of all accepted models; squares represent values averaged over all accepted models. Site numbers are introduced by the number sign (#). (E) Zoomed in view of D.
Fig. 3.Results from the epidemiological metacommunity model. Results of calibration against (A) prevalence data and (B) seasonal fish decline measured as the fractional decline of the estimated population size in late summer compared with early summer. In A, the left point of each year group corresponds to YOY early summer sampling. The observed zero-prevalence value was actually measured in a stretch upstream of site 16 (E and in the text). Site numbers are introduced by the number sign (#). Time evolution of modeled prevalence in site 16 for (C) YOY and (D) adult fish. The intraseasonal model is run for 200 d starting on April 1. Note that the YOY prevalence sample in October of 2015 is missing. Maps of best fit-modeled PKD prevalence evaluated at the end of the summer of 2016 for (E) YOY and (F) adults. E features a zoomed in view of site 16.
Fig. 4.Schematic representation of the epidemiological model. Intraseasonal local model. Interseasonal local model. Parameters are indicated in gray. Spatial model. All state variables and parameters are listed in . , bryozoan submodel; , fish submodel. Adapted from ref. 22.