Literature DB >> 29078317

Osteocyte calcium signals encode strain magnitude and loading frequency in vivo.

Karl J Lewis1, Dorra Frikha-Benayed1, Joyce Louie1, Samuel Stephen1, David C Spray2, Mia M Thi3, Zeynep Seref-Ferlengez3, Robert J Majeska1, Sheldon Weinbaum4, Mitchell B Schaffler4.   

Abstract

Osteocytes are considered to be the major mechanosensory cells of bone, but how osteocytes in vivo process, perceive, and respond to mechanical loading remains poorly understood. Intracellular calcium (Ca2+) signaling resulting from mechanical stimulation has been widely studied in osteocytes in vitro and in bone explants, but has yet to be examined in vivo. This is achieved herein by using a three-point bending device which is capable of delivering well-defined mechanical loads to metatarsal bones of living mice while simultaneously monitoring the intracellular Ca2+ responses of individual osteocytes by using a genetically encoded fluorescent Ca2+ indicator. Osteocyte responses are imaged by using multiphoton fluorescence microscopy. We investigated the in vivo responses of osteocytes to strains ranging from 250 to 3,000 [Formula: see text] and frequencies from 0.5 to 2 Hz, which are characteristic of physiological conditions reported for bone. At all loading frequencies examined, the number of responding osteocytes increased strongly with applied strain magnitude. However, Ca2+ intensity within responding osteocytes did not change significantly with physiological loading magnitudes. Our studies offer a glimpse into how these critical bone cells respond to mechanical load in vivo, as well as provide a technique to determine how the cells encode magnitude and frequency of loading. Published under the PNAS license.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone; calcium signaling; in vivo loading; mechanotransduction; osteocytes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29078317      PMCID: PMC5676898          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1707863114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  65 in total

1.  A model for strain amplification in the actin cytoskeleton of osteocytes due to fluid drag on pericellular matrix.

Authors:  L You; S C Cowin; M B Schaffler; S Weinbaum
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A modular switch for spatial Ca2+ selectivity in the calmodulin regulation of CaV channels.

Authors:  Ivy E Dick; Michael R Tadross; Haoya Liang; Lai Hock Tay; Wanjun Yang; David T Yue
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Osteocyte calcium signaling response to bone matrix deformation.

Authors:  Taiji Adachi; Yuki Aonuma; Shin-ichi Ito; Mototsugu Tanaka; Masaki Hojo; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto; Hiroshi Kamioka
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  A comparison of mechanical properties derived from multiple skeletal sites in mice.

Authors:  Jennifer L Schriefer; Alexander G Robling; Stuart J Warden; Adam J Fournier; James J Mason; Charles H Turner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Indicators based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET).

Authors:  Roger Y Tsien
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2009-07

6.  Dynamic strain similarity in vertebrates; an alternative to allometric limb bone scaling.

Authors:  C T Rubin; L E Lanyon
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1984-03-21       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  A determinant of bone architecture. The minimum effective strain.

Authors:  H M Frost
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Skeletal adaptations to mechanical usage: results from tibial loading studies in rats.

Authors:  M R Forwood; C H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Mechanical stimulation of bone in vivo reduces osteocyte expression of Sost/sclerostin.

Authors:  Alexander G Robling; Paul J Niziolek; Lee A Baldridge; Keith W Condon; Matthew R Allen; Imranul Alam; Sara M Mantila; Jelica Gluhak-Heinrich; Teresita M Bellido; Stephen E Harris; Charles H Turner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Cell visco-elasticity measured with AFM and optical trapping at sub-micrometer deformations.

Authors:  Schanila Nawaz; Paula Sánchez; Kai Bodensiek; Sai Li; Mikael Simons; Iwan A T Schaap
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  32 in total

1.  IDG-SW3 Osteocyte Differentiation and Bone Extracellular Matrix Deposition Are Enhanced in a 3D Matrix Metalloproteinase-Sensitive Hydrogel.

Authors:  Aaron H Aziz; Rachel L Wilmoth; Virginia L Ferguson; Stephanie J Bryant
Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater       Date:  2020-02-19

2.  Transmission of Mechanical Information by Purinergic Signaling.

Authors:  Nicholas Mikolajewicz; Simon Sehayek; Paul W Wiseman; Svetlana V Komarova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Osteogenesis imperfecta mutations in plastin 3 lead to impaired calcium regulation of actin bundling.

Authors:  Christopher L Schwebach; Elena Kudryashova; Weili Zheng; Matthew Orchard; Harper Smith; Lucas A Runyan; Edward H Egelman; Dmitri S Kudryashov
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 4.  In Vivo Osteocyte Mechanotransduction: Recent Developments and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paige V Hinton; Susan M Rackard; Oran D Kennedy
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Spontaneous calcium signaling of cartilage cells: from spatiotemporal features to biophysical modeling.

Authors:  Yilu Zhou; Mengxi Lv; Tong Li; Tiange Zhang; Randall Duncan; Liyun Wang; X Lucas Lu
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Mechanical regulation of bone formation and resorption around implants in a mouse model of osteopenic bone.

Authors:  Zihui Li; Duncan Betts; Gisela Kuhn; Michael Schirmer; Ralph Müller; Davide Ruffoni
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Senescent and apoptotic osteocytes and aging: Exercise to the rescue?

Authors:  Vanessa D Sherk; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Molecular mechanosensors in osteocytes.

Authors:  Lei Qin; Wen Liu; Huiling Cao; Guozhi Xiao
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 13.567

Review 9.  Emerging insights into the comparative effectiveness of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Eben G Estell; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 43.330

10.  A 3D, Dynamically Loaded Hydrogel Model of the Osteochondral Unit to Study Osteocyte Mechanobiology.

Authors:  Rachel L Wilmoth; Virginia L Ferguson; Stephanie J Bryant
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 9.933

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.