Literature DB >> 29077983

A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility estimates in melanoma.

A D Tran1, G Fogarty2, A K Nowak3,4, D Espinoza1, N Rowbotham1, M R Stockler1, R L Morton1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in melanoma is affected by cancer stage. Previous studies have reported limited data on utility-based HRQOL.
OBJECTIVES: To determine pooled estimates of utility-based HRQOL (utilities) for people with American Joint Cancer Committee stage I/II, III or IV melanoma for use in economic evaluations.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression of utilities for patients with melanoma. HRQOL scores reported with the QLQ-C30, SF-36, SF-12, FACT-G and FACT-M instruments were converted to utilities using published mapping algorithms. Meta-analysis was used to calculate mean utilities. Metaregression was used to examine the effects of baseline patient and study characteristics.
RESULTS: We identified 33 studies reporting 213 utilities. From meta-analyses, the mean utility for stage I/II melanoma was 0·97 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·90-0·98]; for stage III melanoma it was 0·77 (95% CI 0·70-0·83); for stage III/IV 0·76 (95% CI 0·76-0·77); and for stage IV melanoma 0·76 (95% CI 0·71-0·81). The difference in utility between stage III and stage IV was not statistically significant (P = 0·52). For patients with stage I/II, the utility estimate at the time of surgery was 0·77 (95% CI 0·75-0·79), and at 3-12 months postsurgery it was 0·85 (95% CI 0·84-0·86). Utility estimates for patients with stage IV melanoma were 0·65 (95% CI 0·62-0·69) during the first 3 months of treatment and 0·83 (95% CI 0·81-0·86) at 4-12 months on treatment. For patients with stage IV melanoma treated with chemotherapy, the utility estimate was 0·52 (95% CI 0·51-0·52), while for those treated with targeted therapy it was 0·83 (95% CI 0·82-0·85).
CONCLUSIONS: These robust, evidence-based estimates of health state utility can be used in economic evaluations of new treatments for patients with early-stage or advanced-stage melanoma.
© 2017 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29077983     DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  4 in total

1.  Health utilities for non-melanoma skin cancers and pre-cancerous lesions: A systematic review.

Authors:  C So; A E Cust; L G Gordon; R L Morton; K Canfell; P Ngo; M Dieng; K McLoughlin; C Watts
Journal:  Skin Health Dis       Date:  2021-06-04

2.  Prevention versus early detection for long-term control of melanoma and keratinocyte carcinomas: a cost-effectiveness modelling study.

Authors:  Louisa Gordon; Catherine Olsen; David C Whiteman; Thomas M Elliott; Monika Janda; Adele Green
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  First-in-human clinical study of novel technique to diagnose malignant melanoma via thermal conductivity measurements.

Authors:  Takahiro Okabe; Taku Fujimura; Junnosuke Okajima; Yumi Kambayashi; Setsuya Aiba; Shigenao Maruyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Optimal Surveillance Strategies for Early-Stage Cutaneous Melanoma Post Primary Tumor Excision: An Economic Evaluation.

Authors:  Vasileios Kontogiannis; Diarmuid Coughlan; Mehdi Javanbakht; Patience Kunonga; Fiona Beyer; Catherine Richmond; Andy Bryant; Dalvir Bajwa; Robert A Ellis; Luke Vale
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2022-01-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.