Literature DB >> 29077966

The Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire: Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change in Women With Pregnancy-Related Pelvic Girdle Pain, Low Back Pain, or Both.

Britt Stuge1, Hanne Krogstad Jenssen2, Margreth Grotle3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ) is a condition-specific measure for women with pelvic girdle pain (PGP). The PGQ includes items relating to activity/participation and bodily symptoms and has reliability, validity, and feasibility for use in research and clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to examine the responsiveness of the PGQ, to determine the minimal important change (MIC) for the PGQ, and to compare the PGQ with other outcome measures.
DESIGN: This study used a prospective cohort design.
METHODS: A total of 801 women responded to a booklet of questionnaires in the last trimester of their pregnancy and within 3 months post partum. Responsiveness analyses followed recommendations from the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. The responsiveness of the PGQ was tested by examining correlations between the change scores of the total PGQ and the other patient-reported outcome measures.
RESULTS: A total of 606 women (76%) reported PGP, low back pain, or both. Of these women, 441 (73%) responded to the follow-up questionnaire post partum. The PGQ (both subscale and total scores) discriminated most accurately between participants who improved and those who did not improve, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 72%. The MIC values indicated that a change score smaller than 25 for the total score and activity subscale score and a change score of 20 for the symptom subscale score should be regarded as insignificant. Baseline PGQ scores had a large impact on the MIC estimates for the absolute change scores but not on the relative percentage change scores. Five of 6 hypotheses were supported (83%). LIMITATIONS: The type of anchor and definition of important change used might be weaknesses in women whose status is changing from pregnant to post partum.
CONCLUSIONS: The PGQ showed acceptable responsiveness in women with PGP, low back pain, or both.
© 2017 American Physical Therapy Association

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29077966     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzx078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  7 in total

1.  Prevalence and factors associated with postpartum pelvic girdle pain among women in Poland: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Małgorzata Starzec-Proserpio; Maria Węgrzynowska; Dorota Sys; Anna Kajdy; Witold Rongies; Barbara Baranowska
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.562

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of a Chinese version of the pelvic girdle questionnaire.

Authors:  Hui Cong; Heng Liu; Yin Sun; Jinsong Gao; Juntao Liu; Liangkun Ma; Britt Stuge; Lixia Chen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Iranian version of Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and cultural adaptation.

Authors:  Farzaneh Rashidi Fakari; Nourossadat Kariman; Giti Ozgoli; Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz; Vida Ghasemi; Fahimeh Rashidi Fakari; Abbas Ebadi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Responsiveness of quality of life measures in children with peripheral vascular malformations: The OVAMA project.

Authors:  M M Lokhorst; S E R Horbach; M Waner; T M O; C J M van der Vleuten; P I Spuls; C M A M van der Horst
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2020-11-30

5.  Prevalence and Factors Associated with Pelvic Girdle Pain During Pregnancy in Australian Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Dragana Ceprnja; Lucinda Chipchase; Paul Fahey; Pranee Liamputtong; Amitabh Gupta
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Claudia Bull; Helena Teede; Lane Carrandi; Azure Rigney; Sally Cusack; Emily Callander
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Responsiveness of quality-of-life measures in patients with peripheral vascular malformations: the OVAMA project.

Authors:  M M Lokhorst; S E R Horbach; M Waner; T M O; C J M van der Vleuten; L B Mokkink; C M A M van der Horst; P I Spuls
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 9.302

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.