Literature DB >> 29077936

Urinary concentrations of 3-(diethylcarbamoyl)benzoic acid (DCBA), a major metabolite of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) and semen parameters among men attending a fertility center.

Thalia R Segal1, Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón2, Yu-Han Chiu3, Paige L Williams4,5, Feiby L Nassan2, Ramace Dadd2, María Ospina6, Antonia M Calafat6, Russ Hauser2,4,7.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Are specific gravity (SG)-adjusted urinary concentrations of 3-(diethylcarbamoyl)benzoic acid (DCBA) associated with semen parameters among men attending an academic fertility center? SUMMARY ANSWER: Our study did not demonstrate any association between SG-adjusted urinary DCBA concentrations and semen parameters among men attending an academic fertility center. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: N,N-Diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) is the most common active ingredient in consumer insect repellents. The recent rise in public health concerns regarding mosquito-borne diseases such as Zika, have led to an increased use of DEET insect repellents, especially among couples planning pregnancy. Animal studies have observed reproductive toxicity from DEET exposure. However, the reproductive health effects of DEET and its metabolites on human reproduction are unknown. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Between 2007 and 2015, 90 men participating in a prospective cohort study at the Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center provided 171 urine samples and 250 semen samples for analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: The urinary concentrations of DEET, N,N-diethyl-3-hydroxymethylbenzamide (DHMB) and DCBA were quantified by isotope-dilution tandem mass spectrometry and adjusted by SG. We used linear mixed models to evaluate the association between tertiles of SG-adjusted urinary DCBA concentrations and semen parameters (semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count, progressive motility, total progressive motility count, normal morphology and total normal morphology count), adjusting for covariates. DEET and DHMB were not considered for analysis because of the low percentage of detectable concentrations (<7%). Effect modification by BMI and smoking status was explored. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Participants had a median age of 36 years and BMI of 27 kg/m2, and 68% had never smoked. The SG-adjusted geometric mean DCBA urinary concentration was 2.20 μg/l, with 85% detection frequency. The majority of semen parameters fell within the normal range with the exception of progressive motility, where 64% of the men had values below the WHO 2010 lower reference limits. SG-adjusted urinary DCBA concentrations were not associated with semen parameters in unadjusted or adjusted models. Men in the highest tertile of SG-adjusted urinary DCBA concentrations had comparable semen parameters to men in the lowest tertile (2.59 vs. 2.88 ml for semen volume, 47.9 vs. 45.8 million/ml for sperm concentration, 116 vs. 118 million for total sperm count, 25 vs. 24% for progressive sperm motility, and 6.1 vs. 5.8% for morphologically normal sperm). In addition, BMI and smoking status did not modify the associations. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: We had a relatively small sample size with similar socioeconomic backgrounds and with overall relatively low urinary concentrations of DEET biomarkers. However, our sample size was enough to detect moderate differences with at least 80% statistical power, between the first and third tertiles of urinary DCBA concentrations. Limitations also include possible misclassification of DCBA exposure and difficulties in extrapolating the findings to the general population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Our study found no associations between urinary concentrations of DCBA, a major metabolite of the insect repellent DEET, and semen parameters in men presenting for infertility treatment. While these results are reassuring, further studies including larger sample sizes and higher exposures are warranted. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The project was financed by the National Institute of Health grants R01ES022955 and R01ES009718 and by grant P30ES000002 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCBA; DEET; insect repellent; male fertility; semen parameters

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29077936      PMCID: PMC5712431          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  24 in total

1.  Methods of covariate selection: directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Weng; Ya-Hui Hsueh; Locksley L McV Messam; Irva Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Critical assessment of the ubiquitous occurrence and fate of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide in water.

Authors:  Sylvain Merel; Shane A Snyder
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Testicular germ-cell apoptosis in stressed rats following combined exposure to pyridostigmine bromide, N,N-diethyl m-toluamide (DEET), and permethrin.

Authors:  Mohamed B Abou-Donia; Hagir B Suliman; Wasiuddin A Khan; Ali A Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2003-01-10

4.  Altered semen quality in relation to urinary concentrations of phthalate monoester and oxidative metabolites.

Authors:  Russ Hauser; John D Meeker; Susan Duty; Manori J Silva; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Toxic encephalopathy associated with use of DEET insect repellents: a case analysis of its toxicity in children.

Authors:  G Briassoulis; M Narlioglou; T Hatzis
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Review of the biodistribution and toxicity of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET).

Authors:  P J Robbins; M G Cherniack
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1986

Review 7.  World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics.

Authors:  Trevor G Cooper; Elizabeth Noonan; Sigrid von Eckardstein; Jacques Auger; H W Gordon Baker; Hermann M Behre; Trine B Haugen; Thinus Kruger; Christina Wang; Michael T Mbizvo; Kirsten M Vogelsong
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 15.610

8.  Novel exposure biomarkers of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET): Data from the 2007-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Antonia M Calafat; Samuel E Baker; Lee-Yang Wong; Amanda M Bishop; Pilar Morales-A; Liza Valentin-Blasini
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 9.621

9.  Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide following dermal application to human volunteers.

Authors:  S Selim; R E Hartnagel; T G Osimitz; K L Gabriel; G P Schoenig
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1995-04

Review 10.  Lifestyle factors and reproductive health: taking control of your fertility.

Authors:  Rakesh Sharma; Kelly R Biedenharn; Jennifer M Fedor; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.