BACKGROUND: Many patients undergoing anaesthesia and surgery experience postoperative complications. Our aim was to investigate whether a systematic follow-up smartphone-based assessment, using recovery assessment by phone points (RAPP) compared with standard care, had a positive effect on day surgery patients' postoperative recovery. We also investigated whether there were differences in women and men's recovery and recovery scores. METHODS: The study was a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial. A total of 997 patients were randomly allocated to either RAPP or standard care. The Swedish web version of a quality of recovery (SwQoR) questionnaire was used to evaluate the patients' postoperative recovery, either on paper or using an application (RAPP) on postoperative days seven and 14. RESULTS: On postoperative day seven the RAPP group reported significantly better values in seven out of 24 items of the SwQoR: sleeping difficulties; not having a general feeling of wellbeing; having difficulty feeling relaxed/comfortable; and dizziness; headache; pain in the surgical wound; and a swollen surgical wound compared with the control group, implying a good postoperative recovery. Both men and women in the RAPP group reported significantly better values (and, hence good postoperative recovery) compared with the control group in the items sleeping difficulties; not having a general feeling of wellbeing and pain in the surgical wound. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of patient-reported outcomes using a smartphone-based application was associated with decreased discomfort from several postoperative symptoms. Systematic e-assessment can thereby increase patients' quality of recovery and identify key areas for improvement in perioperative care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02492191.
BACKGROUND: Many patients undergoing anaesthesia and surgery experience postoperative complications. Our aim was to investigate whether a systematic follow-up smartphone-based assessment, using recovery assessment by phone points (RAPP) compared with standard care, had a positive effect on day surgery patients' postoperative recovery. We also investigated whether there were differences in women and men's recovery and recovery scores. METHODS: The study was a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial. A total of 997 patients were randomly allocated to either RAPP or standard care. The Swedish web version of a quality of recovery (SwQoR) questionnaire was used to evaluate the patients' postoperative recovery, either on paper or using an application (RAPP) on postoperative days seven and 14. RESULTS: On postoperative day seven the RAPP group reported significantly better values in seven out of 24 items of the SwQoR: sleeping difficulties; not having a general feeling of wellbeing; having difficulty feeling relaxed/comfortable; and dizziness; headache; pain in the surgical wound; and a swollen surgical wound compared with the control group, implying a good postoperative recovery. Both men and women in the RAPP group reported significantly better values (and, hence good postoperative recovery) compared with the control group in the items sleeping difficulties; not having a general feeling of wellbeing and pain in the surgical wound. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of patient-reported outcomes using a smartphone-based application was associated with decreased discomfort from several postoperative symptoms. Systematic e-assessment can thereby increase patients' quality of recovery and identify key areas for improvement in perioperative care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02492191.
Authors: Rachita Sood; Jenna R Stoehr; Lindsay E Janes; Jason H Ko; Gregory A Dumanian; Sumanas W Jordan Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2020-04-29
Authors: Ji Yeong Soh; Se Uk Lee; Inpyo Lee; Ki Sang Yoon; Changho Song; Nam Hun Kim; Tae Sung Sohn; Jae Moon Bae; Dong Kyung Chang; Won Chul Cha Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Makoto Mori; Suveen Angraal; Sarwat I Chaudhry; Lisa G Suter; Arnar Geirsson; Joshua D Wallach; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Jessica L Booth; Emily E Sharpe; Timothy T Houle; Lynnette Harris; Regina S Curry; Carol A Aschenbrenner; James C Eisenach Journal: Pain Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 7.926