J L Harris1, K S Haraghey1, M Lodolce2, N L Semenza1. 1. Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity, University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut, USA. 2. Yale/YHNN Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Food companies often use healthy lifestyle messages in child-directed advertising, raising public health concerns about health halo effects for nutrient-poor food/drinks. OBJECTIVE: Examine effects of health messages promoting nutrient-poor foods in child-directed advertising. METHODS: Randomized controlled experiment (N = 138). Children (7-11 years) viewed three child-friendly commercials in one of three conditions: (1) health halo (unfamiliar nutrient-poor food/drink ads with healthy messages); (2) nutrient-poor food/drink ads with other messages and (3) healthy food/drink ads. They rated the commercials and advertised products, provided attitudes about exercise and nutrition and consumed and rated healthy and unhealthy snack foods. RESULTS: Children in the health halo condition rated the advertised nutrient-poor products as significantly healthier compared with children in other conditions (p = .003), but the other commercials did not affect children's attitudes about other advertised products (p's > .50). Child age, gender or TV viewing habits did not significantly predict their ratings (p's > .18). There was no evidence that healthy lifestyle messages and/or healthy food commercials improved children's attitudes about nutrition, exercise or healthy snack consumption. CONCLUSION: Promoting healthy lifestyle messages in child-directed commercials for nutrient-poor food/drinks likely benefits brands by increasing products' perceived healthfulness, but these ads are unlikely to positively affect children's attitudes about health and nutrition.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Food companies often use healthy lifestyle messages in child-directed advertising, raising public health concerns about health halo effects for nutrient-poor food/drinks. OBJECTIVE: Examine effects of health messages promoting nutrient-poor foods in child-directed advertising. METHODS: Randomized controlled experiment (N = 138). Children (7-11 years) viewed three child-friendly commercials in one of three conditions: (1) health halo (unfamiliar nutrient-poor food/drink ads with healthy messages); (2) nutrient-poor food/drink ads with other messages and (3) healthy food/drink ads. They rated the commercials and advertised products, provided attitudes about exercise and nutrition and consumed and rated healthy and unhealthy snack foods. RESULTS:Children in the health halo condition rated the advertised nutrient-poor products as significantly healthier compared with children in other conditions (p = .003), but the other commercials did not affect children's attitudes about other advertised products (p's > .50). Child age, gender or TV viewing habits did not significantly predict their ratings (p's > .18). There was no evidence that healthy lifestyle messages and/or healthy food commercials improved children's attitudes about nutrition, exercise or healthy snack consumption. CONCLUSION: Promoting healthy lifestyle messages in child-directed commercials for nutrient-poor food/drinks likely benefits brands by increasing products' perceived healthfulness, but these ads are unlikely to positively affect children's attitudes about health and nutrition.
Authors: Ana Paula C Richter; Emily W Duffy; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Jennifer L Harris; Jennifer L Pomeranz; Marissa G Hall Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2021-08-13 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Anna Elizabeth Coates; Charlotte Alice Hardman; Jason Christian Grovenor Halford; Paul Christiansen; Emma Jane Boyland Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Oh-Ryeong Ha; Haley J Killian; Ann M Davis; Seung-Lark Lim; Jared M Bruce; Jarrod J Sotos; Samuel C Nelson; Amanda S Bruce Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2020-12-02
Authors: Rosa Whalen; Joanne Harrold; Simon Child; Jason Halford; Emma Boyland Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.390