Literature DB >> 29076021

Antimonate uptake by calcined and uncalcined layered double hydroxides: effect of cationic composition and M2+/M3+ molar ratio.

Elisabetta Dore1, Franco Frau2.   

Abstract

This study gives a contribution to assess the efficacy of some LDHs (layered double hydroxides) in Sb(V) uptake and understand the mechanisms involved in the removal process. Uncalcined nitrate Mg/Al LDHs and the mixed Mg-Al oxides derived from calcined carbonate Mg/Al LDHs mainly remove Sb(OH)6- from aqueous solution through the formation of a brandholzite-like phase (a non-LDH compound with general formula Mg[Sb(OH)6]2·6H2O), although with a different efficiency (< 50 and 90-100% of Sb(V) removed, respectively). The formation of a brandholzite-like compound highlights the fundamental role of Mg in the removal process. The Sb(OH)6- removal capacity of uncalcined nitrate Mg/Al LDHs increases from 22 to 46% as the Mg/Al molar ratio decreases from 4 to 2 thanks to the increasing excess of positive charge of brucite-like sheets and the expanding interlayer thickness due to the different spatial orientations of nitrate groups (flat for Mg/Al = 4, perpendicular for Mg/Al = 2). The presence of Fe3+ in the trivalent cationic site of carbonate LDHs (Mg/(Al + Fe) = 3/(0.5 + 0.5)) improves the Sb(OH)6- removal capacity of their calcined products. When Mg is replaced by Zn in the divalent cationic site of carbonate LDHs and the sorption experiments are performed using the mixed Zn-Al oxides derived from calcination, Sb(OH)6- is mainly removed from the solution through the reconstruction of an antimonate LDH structure (i.e., a zincalstibite-like compound with general formula Zn2Al(OH)6[Sb(OH)6]). The removal efficiency of calcined carbonate Zn/Al LDHs is high and comparable to that of calcined carbonate Mg/Al LDHs; however, the mechanisms involved in the removal process are substantially different: entrance of Sb(OH)6- in the interlayer in the first case, adsorption of Sb(OH)6- onto the surface and formation of a new phase (a brandholzite-like compound) in the second case. In both cases, the removal processes are described with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model; the theoretical maximum adsorption capacity determined with the Langmuir isotherm results to be 4.54 and 4.37 mmol g-1 for calcined carbonate Mg/AlFe and Zn/Al LDHs, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimonate; Brandholzite; Contamination; Layered double hydroxides; Sorption; Zincalstibite

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29076021     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0483-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  12 in total

Review 1.  Application of layered double hydroxides for removal of oxyanions: a review.

Authors:  Kok-Hui Goh; Teik-Thye Lim; Zhili Dong
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 2.  Antimony as a global dilemma: Geochemistry, mobility, fate and transport.

Authors:  Indika Herath; Meththika Vithanage; Jochen Bundschuh
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Natural attenuation processes applying to antimony: a study in the abandoned antimony mine in Goesdorf, Luxembourg.

Authors:  Montserrat Filella; Simon Philippo; Nelson Belzile; Yuwei Chen; François Quentel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Nano-titania-crosslinked chitosan composite as a superior sorbent for antimony (III) and (V).

Authors:  Padala Abdul Nishad; Anupkumar Bhaskarapillai; Sankaralingam Velmurugan
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 9.381

5.  Equilibrium and kinetics studies on As(V) and Sb(V) removal by Fe2+ -doped Mg-Al layered double hydroxides.

Authors:  Tomohito Kameda; Eisuke Kondo; Toshiaki Yoshioka
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 6.789

6.  Removal of antimonate ions from an aqueous solution by anion exchange with magnesium-aluminum layered double hydroxide and the formation of a brandholzite-like structure.

Authors:  Tomohito Kameda; Mami Nakamura; Toshiaki Yoshioka
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.269

7.  Sorption of Sb(III) and Sb(V) to goethite: influence on Sb(III) oxidation and mobilization.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Leuz; Hermann Mönch; C Annette Johnson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Interaction of synthetic sulfate green rust with antimony(V).

Authors:  Satoshi Mitsunobu; Yoshio Takahashi; Yoichi Sakai; Kei Inumaru
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Adsorption of antimony onto iron oxyhydroxides: adsorption behavior and surface structure.

Authors:  Xuejun Guo; Zhijun Wu; Mengchang He; Xiaoguang Meng; Xin Jin; Nan Qiu; Jing Zhang
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 10.588

10.  Antimony distribution and environmental mobility at an historic antimony smelter site, New Zealand.

Authors:  N J Wilson; D Craw; K Hunter
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 8.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.