Literature DB >> 29075388

Delivery and Measurement of High-Value Care in Standardized Patient Encounters.

Jennifer DeLuca Baldwin, Jaclyn Cox, Zhao Helen Wu, Anne Kenny, Steven Angus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Residencies have incorporated high-value care (HVC) training to contain health care expenditures. Assessment methods of HVC curricula are limited.
OBJECTIVE: In our clinical skills laboratory, we evaluated the effectiveness of HVC curricula using standardized patients (SPs) to determine if there is a correlation with performance in counseling, history and physical, HVC knowledge, and demographics.
METHODS: Through ambulatory cases, SPs evaluated postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2) residents using checklists to determine if they obtained the chief complaint, medical and social history, focused physical examination, and conveyed information regarding patient management. Investigators scored knowledge-based questions on the need for imaging in low back pain, annual stress testing in coronary artery disease, and chest x-ray for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Univariate analysis was used to calculate percentage distribution of residents' ordering of inappropriate tests.
RESULTS: All 56 PGY-2 residents participated in the study and completed at least 2 of 3 HVC cases. Analysis showed that 48% (27 of 56) ordered at least 1 inappropriate test. Residents who ordered unnecessary testing had similar performance in history and physical as well as knowledge of HVC. Inappropriate ordering was significantly associated with poorer performance in counseling (mean percentage counseling score of 68% versus 56% for those who ordered inappropriately, P < .001) and communication skills (mean percentage communication score of 74% versus 71% for those who ordered inappropriately, P < .003). There were no patterns for ordering by demographics.
CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation of residents during SP encounters found a correlation between the use of inappropriate testing and lower counseling and communication skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29075388      PMCID: PMC5646926          DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00016.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  11 in total

1.  Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Michael J Barry; Susan Edgman-Levitan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The gross domestic product and health care spending.

Authors:  Victor R Fuchs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients' preferences matter.

Authors:  Albert G Mulley; Chris Trimble; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-11-08

4.  Trends in High-Value Care as Reported by Internal Medicine Program Directors.

Authors:  Deborah Korenstein; Arlene Weissman; Cynthia D Smith
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-07

5.  Implementation barriers for general practice guidelines on low back pain a qualitative study.

Authors:  H Schers; M Wensing; Z Huijsmans; M van Tulder; R Grol
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Understanding patient beliefs regarding the use of imaging in the management of low back pain.

Authors:  H J Jenkins; M J Hancock; C G Maher; S D French; J S Magnussen
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 7.  Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Jarvik; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Charting the Route to High-Value Care: The Role of Medical Education.

Authors:  Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Training Physicians to Provide High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lorette A Stammen; Renée E Stalmeijer; Emma Paternotte; Andrea Oudkerk Pool; Erik W Driessen; Fedde Scheele; Laurents P S Stassen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Do interventions designed to support shared decision-making reduce health inequalities? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Lewis Carpenter; Hayley Dolan; Paulina Bravo; Mala Mann; Frances Bunn; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Influence of Standardized Nursing Management of Hospital Based on Smart Electronic Medical Blockchain on Nursing Quality of Digestive Endoscopy Room.

Authors:  Yufen Niu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 2.  Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework.

Authors:  Justin H Lam; Kristen Pickles; Fiona F Stanaway; Katy J L Bell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  An Advanced Communication Skills Workshop Using Standardized Patients for Senior Medical Students.

Authors:  Jaideep S Talwalkar; Auguste H Fortin; Laura J Morrison; Alan Kliger; David I Rosenthal; Tanya Murtha; Matthew S Ellman
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2021-05-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.