| Literature DB >> 29075368 |
Emilie E L Muller1,2, Shaman Narayanasamy1, Myriam Zeimes1, Cédric C Laczny1,3, Laura A Lebrun1, Malte Herold1, Nathan D Hicks4, John D Gillece4, James M Schupp4, Paul Keim4, Paul Wilmes1.
Abstract
The Gram-negative beta-proteobacterium Zoogloea sp. LCSB751 (LMG 29444) was newly isolated from foaming activated sludge of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Here, we describe its draft genome sequence and annotation together with a general physiological and genomic analysis, as the first sequenced representative of the Zoogloea genus. Moreover, Zoogloea sp. gene expression in its environment is described using metatranscriptomic data obtained from the same treatment plant. The presented genomic and transcriptomic information demonstrate a pronounced capacity of this genus to synthesize poly-β-hydroxyalkanoate within wastewater.Entities:
Keywords: Genome assembly; Genomic features; Lipid metabolism; Metatranscriptomics; Poly-hydroxyalkanoate; Wastewater treatement plant
Year: 2017 PMID: 29075368 PMCID: PMC5648520 DOI: 10.1186/s40793-017-0274-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stand Genomic Sci ISSN: 1944-3277
Fig. 1Photomicrograph of 10.1601/nm.2061 sp. strain LCSB751. a: bright field of anaerobically grown colonies, Nile Red stained after heat fixation; b: same field observed with epifluorescence using an excitation light from a Xenon arc lamp. The beam was passed through an Optoscan monochromator (Cairn Research, Kent, UK) with 550/20 nm selected band pass. Emitted light was reflected through a 620/60 nm bandpass filter with a 565 dichroic connected to a cooled CCD camera (QImaging, Exi Blue). The images were taken using an inverted microscope (Nikon Ti) equipped with a 60× oil immersion Nikon Apo-Plan lambda objective (1.4 N.A) and an intermediate magnification of 1.5×. The scale represents 10 μm. All imaging data were collected and analysed using the OptoMorph (Cairn Research, Kent, UK) and ImageJ
Classification and general features of Zoogloea sp. strain LCSB751 according to the MIGS recommendation [18]
| MIGS ID | Property | Term | Evidence codea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classification | Domain | TAS [ | |
| Phylum | TAS [ | ||
| Class | TAS [ | ||
| Order | TAS [ | ||
| Family | TAS [ | ||
| Genus | IDA | ||
| Species Unknown | IDA | ||
| Strain: LCSB751 | |||
| Gram stain | Negative | TAS [ | |
| Cell shape | Rod | TAS [ | |
| Motility | Motile | TAS [ | |
| Sporulation | Not reported | NAS | |
| Temperature range | 5–40 °C | TAS [ | |
| Optimum temperature | 25–30 °C | TAS [ | |
| pH range; Optimum | 6.0–9.0; 6.5–7.5 | TAS [ | |
| MIGS-6 | Habitat | Activated sludge | IDA |
| MIGS-6.3 | Salinity | Inhibited at 0.5% NaCl ( | TAS [ |
| MIGS-22 | Oxygen requirement | facultative anaerobe | IDA |
| MIGS-15 | Biotic relationship | free-living | IDA |
| MIGS-14 | Pathogenicity | non-pathogen | NAS |
| MIGS-4 | Geographic location | Luxembourg | IDA |
| MIGS-5 | Sample collection | 2011 | IDA |
| MIGS-4.1 | Latitude | 49°30′48.29′′N; | IDA |
| MIGS-4.2 | Longitude | 6°1′4.53′′E | IDA |
| MIGS-4.4 | Altitude | 275 m | IDA |
aEvidence codes - IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [37]
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. The type species strains of every species of the 10.1601/nm.2016 family were used (in bold) as well as all the type strains of the genus 10.1601/nm.2061, according to the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN; http://www.bacterio.net). Whole genome GenBank IDs are provided in brackets. The 16S rRNA sequences were aligned using ClustalW, the alignment was curated using Gblocks conserving 81% of the initial positions and the phylogeny was computed with BioNJ using 100 bootstraps and the default (K2P) substitution model, using the pipeline Phylogeny.fr [38]
Generation time, growth rate and maximum growth of 10.1601/nm.2061 sp. LCSB751 under different aerobic culture conditions
| Medium | Generation time | Growth rate | Maximum OD600 b |
|---|---|---|---|
| R2A | 1 h 54 min ± 3 min | 0.0058 | 0.46 |
| MSV A + B | 4 h 30 min ± 53 min | 0.0026 | 0.21 |
| Slijkhuis A | 10 h 42 min ± 1 h 51min | 0.0011 | 0.73 |
aValues are an average of independent triplicate experiments
bOD600 stands for optical density measured at 600 nm with the spectrometer “Biochrom WPA CO 8000 Cell Density Meter” using BRAND disposable semi-micro UV cuvettes of 12.5 × 12.5 × 45 mm
Project information
| MIGS ID | Property | Term |
|---|---|---|
| MIGS 31 | Finishing quality | Draft |
| MIGS-28 | Libraries used | Illumina paired-end reads (insert size 30 bp) |
| MIGS 29 | Sequencing platforms | Illumina HiSeq |
| MIGS 31.2 | Fold coverage | 150× |
| MIGS 30 | Assemblers | SPAdes (version 3.1.1) |
| MIGS 32 | Gene calling method | RAST servera and Prokkab |
| Locus Tag | fig|6666666.102999 | |
| Genbank ID | MWUM00000000 | |
| GenBank Date of Release | 15 March 2017 | |
| GOLD ID | Gs0128811 | |
| BIOPROJECT | PRJNA230567 | |
| MIGS 13 | Source Material Identifier | LMG 29444 |
| Project relevance | Environmental, biodiversity, biotechnological |
aGene calling using GLIMMER [27, 39]
bGene calling using Prodigal [26, 40]
Fig. 3Circular graphical map of the 10.1601/nm.2061 sp. LCSB751 draft genome assembly, annotation and in situ expression. Data shown on the map explained from the outer to inner circles (i-x): i) contigs above 1 kb. Accordingly, all subsequent information contained within inner circles are based on these contigs, including ii) forward strand coding sequences in red (CDS), iii) reverse strand CDS in blue, iv) CDS that are related to lipid accumulation in yellow (forward and reverse strands), v-viii) gene expression in situ based on metatranscriptomic data from four sampling dates (25 January 2011, 11 January 2012, 5 October 2011, and 12 October 2011 [6]) ix) GC-deviation (from overall G + C %) and x) GC-skew, respectively. Graphics were generated using Circos [41]. CDS were predicted and annotated using the RAST server [27]. Metatranscriptomic data from four sampling dates were aligned against the draft genome using BWA [42] and depth of coverage, computed using BEDtools [25] was used as a proxy for expression. Depth of coverage <0.3 were set to zero
Genome statistics of Zoogloea sp. LCSB751
| Attribute | Value | % of Totala |
|---|---|---|
| Genome size (bp) | 5,817,831 | 100.00 |
| DNA coding (bp)b | 4,966,077 | 85.36 |
| DNA G + C (bp) | 3,733,728 | 64.18 |
| DNA scaffolds | 773 | 100.00 |
| Total genes | 5,202c / 5,200d | 100.00c / 100.00d |
| Protein coding genes | 5,125c / 5,118d | 98.52c / 98.42d |
| RNA genes | 77c / 80d | 1.48c / 1.54d |
| Pseudo genes | unknown | unknown |
| Genes in internal clusters | unknown | unknown |
| Genes with function prediction c | 3661 | 70.38 |
| Genes assigned to COGs | 4191 | 80.56 |
| Genes with Pfam domains | 4202 | 80.78 |
| Genes with signal peptides | 505 | 9.71 |
| Genes with transmembrane helices | 1157 | 22.24 |
| CRISPR repeats | 2d / 3e | 2.85 |
aTotal is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs, total number of scaffolds or the total number of genes in the annotated genome
bCumulative length of genes, without considering overlaps
cAs predicted by RAST server [27]
dAs predicted by Pokka [26]
eAs predicted by MetaCRT [31]
Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories
| Code | Value | %age | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| J | 182 | 3.50 | Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis |
| A | 3 | 0.06 | RNA processing and modification |
| K | 342 | 6.57 | Transcription |
| L | 204 | 3.92 | Replication, recombination and repair |
| B | 3 | 0.06 | Chromatin structure and dynamics |
| D | 52 | 1.00 | Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning |
| V | 69 | 1.33 | Defense mechanisms |
| T | 564 | 10.84 | Signal transduction mechanisms |
| M | 252 | 4.84 | Cell wall/membrane biogenesis |
| N | 177 | 3.40 | Cell motility |
| U | 142 | 2.73 | Intracellular trafficking and secretion |
| O | 189 | 3.63 | Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones |
| C | 362 | 6.96 | Energy production and conversion |
| G | 130 | 2.50 | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism |
| E | 305 | 5.86 | Amino acid transport and metabolism |
| F | 85 | 1.63 | Nucleotide transport and metabolism |
| H | 185 | 3.56 | Coenzyme transport and metabolism |
| I | 202 | 3.88 | Lipid transport and metabolism |
| P | 283 | 5.44 | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism |
| Q | 126 | 2.42 | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism |
| R | 520 | 10.00 | General function prediction only |
| S | 351 | 6.75 | Function unknown |
| – | 1011 | 19.43 | Not in COGs |
Percentage (%) is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome
Gene abundance and frequency related to the lipid metabolism of 10.1601/nm.2061 sp. LCSB751
| Subsystem | Subsystem feature count | Subsystem feature (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cardiolipin synthesis | 2 | 6.67 |
| Glycerolipid and glycerophospholipid metabolism in bacteria | 28 | 93.33 |
|
|
|
|
| Triacylglycerol metabolism | 3 | 100 |
|
|
|
|
| Fatty acid biosynthesis FASII | 30 | 42.25 |
| Fatty acid metabolism cluster | 41 | 57.75 |
|
|
|
|
| Polyhydroxybutyrate metabolism | 56 | 100 |
|
|
|
|
| Isoprenoids for quinones | 5 | 14.71 |
| Isoprenoid biosynthesis | 18 | 52.94 |
| Polyprenyl diphosphate biosynthesis | 4 | 11.76 |
| Nonmevalonate branch of isoprenoid Biosynthesis | 7 | 20.59 |
The different categories (in bold) and subcategories of the subsystem “Fatty acids, lipids and isoprenoid” are represented