Literature DB >> 29074423

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Reoperation for Recurrent Sciatica Symptoms: A Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in 94 Patients.

Junlong Wu1, Chao Zhang2, Kang Lu2, Changqing Li2, Yue Zhou3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recurrent symptoms of sciatica after previous surgical intervention is a relatively common and troublesome clinical problem. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression has been proved to be an effective method for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. However, the prognostic factors and outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar reoperation (PELR) for recurrent sciatica symptoms were still unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and prognostic factors of patients who underwent PELR for recurrent sciatica symptoms.
METHODS: From 2009 to 2015, 94 patients who underwent PELR for recurrent sciatica symptoms were enrolled. The primary surgeries include transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (n = 16), microendoscopic discectomy (n = 31), percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression (PELD, n = 17), and open discectomy (n = 30). The mean follow-up period was 36 months, and 86 (91.5%) patients had obtained at least 24 months' follow-up.
RESULTS: Of the 94 patients with adequate follow-up, 51 (54.3%) exhibited excellent improvement, 23 (24.5%) had good improvement, and 7 (7.4%) had fair improvement according to modified Macnab criteria. The average re-recurrence rate was 9.6%, with no difference among the different primary surgery groups (PELD, 3/17; microendoscopic discectomy, 2/31; open discectomy, 3/30; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, 1/16). There was a trend toward greater rates of symptom recurrence in the primary group of PELD who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar reoperation compared with other groups, but this did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis suggested that age, body mass index, and surgeon level was independent prognostic factors. Obesity (hazard ratio 13.98, 95% confidence interval 3.394-57.57; P < 0.001) was the risk factor affecting re-recurrence according to logistic regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: PELR is a safe and effective treatment for recurrent sciatica symptoms regardless of different primary operation type. Obesity, inferior surgeon level, and patient age older than 40 years were associated with a worse prognosis. Obesity was also a strong and independent predictor of re-recurrence sciatica symptoms after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive surgery; Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression; Prognostic factors; Recurrent sciatica symptoms; Surgical outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29074423     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  8 in total

1.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Honghui Lu; Yu Yao; Ligang Shi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  Risk Factors for Recurrent L4-5 Disc Herniation After Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of 654 Cases.

Authors:  Meng Kong; Derong Xu; Changtong Gao; Kai Zhu; Shuo Han; Hao Zhang; Chuanli Zhou; Xuexiao Ma
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-12-18

3.  Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Visualized Foraminoplasty and Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Wenbin Hua; Wencan Ke; Bingjin Wang; Qian Xiang; Yukun Zhang; Xinghuo Wu; Shuai Li; Kun Wang; Xianlin Zeng; Yong Gao; Shuhua Yang; Baojun Xiao; Cao Yang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.071

4.  Risk Factors Involved in the Early and Medium-Term Poor Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Hui Wu; Shen Hu; Jiahao Liu; Dingwen He; Qi Chen; Xigao Cheng
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 2.832

5.  A comparative study of single and double incision for L4/5 and L5/S1 double-level percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Yingchuang Tang; Zixiang Liu; Hao Liu; Junxin Zhang; Xiaoyu Zhu; Zhonglai Qian; Huilin Yang; Haiqing Mao; Kai Zhang; Hao Chen; Kangwu Chen
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-30

6.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for the Treatment of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ke Zhao; Lin-Da Li; Tong-Tong Li; Yong Xiong
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  Risk Factors for Recurrent L5-S1 Disc Herniation After Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Chaojie Yu; Xinli Zhan; Chong Liu; Shian Liao; Jinming Xu; Tuo Liang; Zide Zhang; Jiarui Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-03-25

8.  Nomograms for Predicting Recurrent Herniation in PETD with Preoperative Radiological Factors.

Authors:  Chong Zhao; Hao Zhang; Yan Wang; Derong Xu; Shuo Han; Shengwei Meng; Jialuo Han; Houchen Liu; Chuanli Zhou; Xuexiao Ma
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.133

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.