Literature DB >> 29074242

Levels, sources and probabilistic health risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the agricultural soils from sites neighboring suburban industries in Shanghai.

Ruipeng Tong1, Xiaoyi Yang1, Hanrui Su2, Yue Pan2, Qiuzhuo Zhang3, Juan Wang3, Mingce Long4.   

Abstract

The levels, sources and quantitative probabilistic health risks for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in agricultural soils in the vicinity of power, steel and petrochemical plants in the suburbs of Shanghai are discussed. The total concentration of 16 PAHs in the soils ranges from 223 to 8214ng g-1. The sources of PAHs were analyzed by both isomeric ratios and a principal component analysis-multiple linear regression method. The results indicate that PAHs mainly originated from the incomplete combustion of coal and oil. The probabilistic risk assessments for both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks posed by PAHs in soils with adult farmers as concerned receptors were quantitatively calculated by Monte Carlo simulation. The estimated total carcinogenic risks (TCR) for the agricultural soils has a 45% possibility of exceeding the acceptable threshold value (10-6), indicating potential adverse health effects. However, all non-carcinogenic risks are below the threshold value. Oral intake is the dominant exposure pathway, accounting for 77.7% of TCR, while inhalation intake is negligible. The three PAHs with the highest contribution for TCR are BaP (64.35%), DBA (17.56%) and InP (9.06%). Sensitivity analyses indicate that exposure frequency has the greatest impact on the total risk uncertainty, followed by the exposure dose through oral intake and exposure duration. These results indicate that it is essential to manage the health risks of PAH-contaminated agricultural soils in the vicinity of typical industries in megacities.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural soils; Carcinogenic risk; Monte Carlo method; Non-carcinogenic risk; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29074242     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  From headwaters to estuary: distribution, sources, and ecological risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an intensively human-impacted river, China.

Authors:  Yanan Li; Xiaomei Zhen; Lin Liu; Chongguo Tian; Xiaohui Pan; Jianhui Tang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Concentration and Potential Ecological Risk of PAHs in Different Layers of Soil in the Petroleum-Contaminated Areas of the Loess Plateau, China.

Authors:  Di Wang; Jing Ma; Hao Li; Xingchang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Trends in the Exposure, Distribution, and Health Risk Assessment of Perchlorate among Crayfish in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River.

Authors:  Mengyuan Chen; Manman Wang; Bingjie Zhou; Mengxin Zhou; Qiao Wang; Xin Liu; Yan Liu; Yongning Wu; Xiaole Zhao; Zhiyong Gong
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-27

4.  Contamination level, sources, and health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in suburban vegetable field soils of Changchun, Northeast China.

Authors:  Zhengwu Cui; Yang Wang; Liansheng Du; Yong Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Alkylated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Are the Largest Contributor to Polycyclic Aromatic Compound Concentrations in the Topsoil of Huaibei Coalfield, China.

Authors:  Yahui Qian; Zhenpeng Xu; Xiuping Hong; Zhonggeng Luo; Xiulong Gao; Cai Tie; Handong Liang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.