Literature DB >> 29074228

DNA replication stress drives fragile site instability.

Michal Irony-Tur Sinai1, Batsheva Kerem2.   

Abstract

DNA replication stress is one of the early drivers enabling the ongoing acquisition of genetic changes arising during tumorigenesis. As such, it is a feature of most pre-malignant and malignant cells. In this review article, we focus on the early events initiating DNA replication stress and the preferential sensitivity of common fragile sites (CFSs) to this stress. CFSs are specific genomic regions within the normal chromosomal structure, which appear as gaps and breaks in the metaphase chromosomes of cells grown under mild replication stress conditions. The main characteristics predisposing CFSs to instability include late replication timing, delayed replication completion, failure to activate additional origins, origin paucity along large genomic regions, collision between replication and transcription complexes along large genes, and the presence of AT-dinucleotide rich sequences. The contribution of these features to instability at CFSs during early cancer development is discussed.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosomal instability; Common fragile sites; Replication stress

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29074228     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  9 in total

Review 1.  The role of fork stalling and DNA structures in causing chromosome fragility.

Authors:  Simran Kaushal; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  Replication Stress, Genomic Instability, and Replication Timing: A Complex Relationship.

Authors:  Lina-Marie Briu; Chrystelle Maric; Jean-Charles Cadoret
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Nucleolar protein nucleolin functions in replication stress-induced DNA damage responses.

Authors:  Kasumi Kawamura; Fei Qi; Qingmei Meng; Ikue Hayashi; Junya Kobayashi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  The processivity factor Pol32 mediates nuclear localization of DNA polymerase delta and prevents chromosomal fragile site formation in Drosophila development.

Authors:  Jingyun Ji; Xiaona Tang; Wen Hu; Keith A Maggert; Yikang S Rong
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Modeling double strand break susceptibility to interrogate structural variation in cancer.

Authors:  Tracy J Ballinger; Britta A M Bouwman; Reza Mirzazadeh; Silvano Garnerone; Nicola Crosetto; Colin A Semple
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Replication Stress: A Review of Novel Targets to Enhance Radiosensitivity-From Bench to Clinic.

Authors:  Yuewen Zhang; Lei Wu; Zhao Wang; Jinpeng Wang; Shrabasti Roychoudhury; Bartlomiej Tomasik; Gang Wu; Geng Wang; Xinrui Rao; Rui Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Topoisomerase II contributes to DNA secondary structure-mediated double-stranded breaks.

Authors:  Karol Szlachta; Arkadi Manukyan; Heather M Raimer; Sandeep Singh; Anita Salamon; Wenying Guo; Kirill S Lobachev; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 19.160

Review 8.  Working on Genomic Stability: From the S-Phase to Mitosis.

Authors:  Sara Ovejero; Avelino Bueno; María P Sacristán
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 9.  Sites of chromosomal instability in the context of nuclear architecture and function.

Authors:  Constanze Pentzold; Miriam Kokal; Stefan Pentzold; Anja Weise
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 9.261

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.