Literature DB >> 29074201

Safety, acceptability and tolerability of uncoated and excipient-coated high density silicon micro-projection array patches in human subjects.

Paul Griffin1, Suzanne Elliott2, Kenia Krauer2, Cristyn Davies3, S Rachel Skinner3, Christopher D Anderson4, Angus Forster5.   

Abstract

Most vaccinations are performed by intramuscular injection with a needle and syringe. However, this method is not ideal due to limitations, such as the risk of needle-stick injury, the requirement for trained personnel to give injections and the need to reconstitute lyophilized vaccines. Therefore, we tested an alternative delivery technology that overcomes the problems with needle and syringe. The Nanopatch™ is an array of 10,000 silicon micro-projections per cm2 that can be dry-coated with vaccine for skin delivery. The high number and density of micro-projections means that high velocity application is required to achieve consistent skin penetration. Before clinically testing a vaccine Nanopatch, this study tests the safety, tolerability and acceptability/utility of uncoated and excipient-coated Nanopatches in healthy adults. Nanopatches were applied to skin of the upper arm and volar forearm and left in contact with the skin for two minutes before removal. The application sites were assessed for local skin response over 28 days. Acceptability interviews were also performed. No unexpected adverse events directly related to the Nanopatch application were reported. All applications of the Nanopatch resulted in an expected erythema response which faded between days 3 and 7. In some subjects, some skin discolouration was visible for several days or up to 3 weeks after application. The majority (83%) of subjects reported a preference for the Nanopatch compared to the needle and syringe and found the application process to be simple and acceptable. On a pain scale from 0 to 10, 78% of applications were scored "0" (no pain) with the average scores for less than 1. The results from this study demonstrate the feasibility of the Nanopatch to improve vaccination by showing that application of the product without vaccine to human skin is safe, tolerable and preferred to needle and syringe administration. Clinical trial registry ID: ACTRN1261500083549.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptability; Application; Microneedle; Nanopatch; Tolerability; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29074201     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  13 in total

Review 1.  Microneedle Coating Methods: A Review with a Perspective.

Authors:  Rohan S J Ingrole; Harvinder Singh Gill
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  M-protein based vaccine induces immunogenicity and protection from Streptococcus pyogenes when delivered on a high-density microarray patch (HD-MAP).

Authors:  Jamie-Lee S Mills; Cesar M Jayashi Flores; Manisha Pandey; Michael F Good; Simone Reynolds; Christine Wun; Ainslie Calcutt; S Ben Baker; Senthil Murugappan; Alexandra C I Depelsenaire; Jessica Dooley; Paul V Fahey; Angus H Forster
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 7.344

Review 3.  The potential role of using vaccine patches to induce immunity: platform and pathways to innovation and commercialization.

Authors:  Kamran Badizadegan; James L Goodson; Paul A Rota; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.217

4.  Evaluation of the clinical impact of repeat application of hydrogel-forming microneedle array patches.

Authors:  Rehan Al-Kasasbeh; Aaron J Brady; Aaron J Courtenay; Eneko Larrañeta; Maelíosa T C McCrudden; Donal O'Kane; Stephen Liggett; Ryan F Donnelly
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  Progress in microneedle array patch (MAP) for vaccine delivery.

Authors:  Thuy Trang Nguyen; Yujeong Oh; Yunseo Kim; Yura Shin; Seung-Ki Baek; Jung-Hwan Park
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  cGAMP/Saponin Adjuvant Combination Improves Protective Response to Influenza Vaccination by Microneedle Patch in an Aged Mouse Model.

Authors:  Elena V Vassilieva; Song Li; Heorhiy Korniychuk; Dahnide M Taylor; Shelly Wang; Mark R Prausnitz; Richard W Compans
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 7.  Microneedle for transdermal drug delivery: current trends and fabrication.

Authors:  Jae Hwan Jung; Sung Giu Jin
Journal:  J Pharm Investig       Date:  2021-03-04

8.  Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination with a high-density microarray patch: Results from a randomized, controlled phase I clinical trial.

Authors:  Angus H Forster; Katey Witham; Alexandra C I Depelsenaire; Margaret Veitch; James W Wells; Adam Wheatley; Melinda Pryor; Jason D Lickliter; Barbara Francis; Steve Rockman; Jesse Bodle; Peter Treasure; Julian Hickling; Germain J P Fernando
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Innate local response and tissue recovery following application of high density microarray patches to human skin.

Authors:  David A Muller; Joakim Henricson; S Ben Baker; Totte Togö; Cesar M Jayashi Flores; Pierre A Lemaire; Angus Forster; Chris D Anderson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  M-protein based vaccine induces immunogenicity and protection from Streptococcus pyogenes when delivered on a high-density microarray patch (HD-MAP).

Authors:  Jamie-Lee S Mills; Cesar M Jayashi Flores; Manisha Pandey; Michael F Good; Simone Reynolds; Christine Wun; Ainslie Calcutt; S Ben Baker; Senthil Murugappan; Alexandra C I Depelsenaire; Jessica Dooley; Paul V Fahey; Angus H Forster
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 7.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.