Wen Hua1, Sijia Cao2, Jing Cui2, David Maberley2, Joanne Matsubara3. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. 3. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.. Electronic address: jms@mail.ubc.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the underlying reasons for noncompliance among Chinese patients undergoing laser photocoagulation treatment for diabetic retinopathy (DR). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 262 patients with DR with indications for panretinal photocoagulation and focal laser treatment were recruited. METHODS: Those who did not complete the prescribed laser treatment were categorized into 2 types of defaulters: Type 1 defaulters were those who did not initiate laser treatment as scheduled; type 2 defaulters were those who did not complete the entire laser sessions, including terminating midterm or defaulting prompt supplement of laser treatment. A standardized questionnaire was given to the 2 types of defaulters to collect information about the reasons for noncompliance. Data were analyzed and subjected to χ2 test or Fisher exact statistical tests. RESULTS: The noncompliance rate was 45.5%, which is significantly greater than some developed countries. Unawareness of the necessity for treatment and unawareness of the importance to complete treatment were 2 main reasons leading to noncompliance, representing 28.8% and 36.0%, respectively. Unawareness of the necessity for treatment and fear of laser treatment were more important for type 1 defaulters (29 vs 6 and 11 vs 0, respectively), whereas unawareness of completeness of laser treatment was overweighed in type 2 defaulters (27 vs 13 patients; all P<0.01). These results were likely related to the lack of knowledge about the potential consequences of DR, the underlying principle of laser treatment, and panretinal photocoagulation procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Developing appropriate education programs targeting specific reasons will help to improve the compliance in patients with DR.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the underlying reasons for noncompliance among Chinese patients undergoing laser photocoagulation treatment for diabetic retinopathy (DR). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 262 patients with DR with indications for panretinal photocoagulation and focal laser treatment were recruited. METHODS: Those who did not complete the prescribed laser treatment were categorized into 2 types of defaulters: Type 1 defaulters were those who did not initiate laser treatment as scheduled; type 2 defaulters were those who did not complete the entire laser sessions, including terminating midterm or defaulting prompt supplement of laser treatment. A standardized questionnaire was given to the 2 types of defaulters to collect information about the reasons for noncompliance. Data were analyzed and subjected to χ2 test or Fisher exact statistical tests. RESULTS: The noncompliance rate was 45.5%, which is significantly greater than some developed countries. Unawareness of the necessity for treatment and unawareness of the importance to complete treatment were 2 main reasons leading to noncompliance, representing 28.8% and 36.0%, respectively. Unawareness of the necessity for treatment and fear of laser treatment were more important for type 1 defaulters (29 vs 6 and 11 vs 0, respectively), whereas unawareness of completeness of laser treatment was overweighed in type 2 defaulters (27 vs 13 patients; all P<0.01). These results were likely related to the lack of knowledge about the potential consequences of DR, the underlying principle of laser treatment, and panretinal photocoagulation procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Developing appropriate education programs targeting specific reasons will help to improve the compliance in patients with DR.