Literature DB >> 29073879

Historic PM2.5/PM10 Concentrations in the Southeastern United States-Potential Implications of the Revised Particulate Matter Standard.

William J Parkhurst1, Roger L Tanner1, Frances P Weatherford1, Ralph J Valente1, James F Meagher2.   

Abstract

This report summarizes a PM2.5/PM10 particulate matter data set consisting of 861 PM2.5/PM10 sample pairs collected with dichotomous samplers by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) from 1982 to 1991. Eight monitoring stations, ranging from urban-industrial to rural-background, were operated across three east-central U.S. states. Annual average PM2.5 concentrations ranged from 12.6 to 21.3 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3), with an overall mean of 15.7 μg/m3. Likewise, annual average PM10 concentrations ranged from 17.8 to 33.7 μg/m3, with an overall mean of 23.7 μg/m3. High summer-low winter seasonality was evident, particularly for PM2.5, with the highest monthly PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations in August (26.4 and 37.5 μg/m3, respectively) and the lowest in February (9.9 and 15.3 μg/m3, respectively). A strong association (r2 = 0.84) was found between PM and PM mass with PM mass contributing, on average, 67% of PM10 mass. Applying TVA's PM2 5/PM10 ratio to recent (1993-1995) regional high-volume PM10 Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) data for the east-central United States suggests that as many as 80% of monitored counties would have equaled or exceeded the level of the new annual PM2.5 metric of 15 μg/m3. A decline in average PM2.5 mass on the order of 3-5 μg/m3 from 1982 through 1991 is also suggested. Daily PM2 5 mass appears to be reasonably well associated (r = 0.47) with maximum hourly ozone during the warmer months (spring through fall). Sulfate compounds comprise a major portion of the measured PM2 5 mass, with that fraction being highest in the summer months. Viewed collectively, these data suggest that although compliance with the annual and 24-hr PM and 24-hr PM metrics should prove readily attainable, the annual PM2.5 metric will present a major regulatory management challenge for much of the east-central United States.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 29073879     DOI: 10.1080/10473289.1999.10463894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  2 in total

1.  Elemental Composition of PM2.5 and PM10 and Health Risks Assessment in the Industrial Districts of Chelyabinsk, South Ural Region, Russia.

Authors:  Tatyana G Krupnova; Olga V Rakova; Kirill A Bondarenko; Artem F Saifullin; Darya A Popova; Sanja Potgieter-Vermaak; Ricardo H M Godoi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  An integrated WRF/HYSPLIT modeling approach for the assessment of PM(2.5) source regions over the Mississippi Gulf Coast region.

Authors:  Anjaneyulu Yerramilli; Venkata Bhaskar Rao Dodla; Venkata Srinivas Challa; Latoya Myles; William R Pendergrass; Christoph A Vogel; Hari Prasad Dasari; Francis Tuluri; Julius M Baham; Robert L Hughes; Chuck Patrick; John H Young; Shelton J Swanier; Mark G Hardy
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.763

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.