Literature DB >> 29073799

Explaining the effects of a decision intervention on mammography intentions: The roles of worry, fear and perceived susceptibility to breast cancer.

Holli H Seitz1,2, Marilyn M Schapira3,4, Laura A Gibson1, Christine Skubisz1,5, Susan Mello1,6, Katrina Armstrong3,7, Joseph N Cappella1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the effects of a mammography decision intervention on perceived susceptibility to breast cancer (PSBC) and emotion and investigates how these outcomes predict mammography intentions.
DESIGN: Randomised between-subjects online experiment. Participants were stratified into two levels of risk. Within each stratum, conditions included a basic information condition and six decision intervention conditions that included personalised risk estimates and varied according to a 2 (amount of information: brief vs. extended) × 3 (format: expository vs. untailored exemplar vs. tailored exemplar) design. Participants included 2465 US women ages 35-49. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PSBC as a percentage, PSBC as a frequency, worry, fear and mammography intentions.
RESULTS: The intervention resulted in significant reductions in PSBC as a percentage for women in both strata and significant increases in worry and fear for women in the upper risk stratum. Of the possible mediators examined, only PSBC as a percentage was a consistent mediator of the effect of the intervention on mammography intentions.
CONCLUSION: The results provide insight into the mechanism of action of the intervention by showing that PSBC mediated the effects of the intervention on mammography intentions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision aid; fear; mammography; perceived risk; perceived susceptibility; worry

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29073799      PMCID: PMC6139035          DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1387261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Health        ISSN: 0887-0446


  39 in total

1.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Risk-based mammography screening: an effort to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms.

Authors:  Otis W Brawley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  The relation between projected breast cancer risk, perceived cancer risk, and mammography use. Results from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  C P Gross; G Filardo; H S Singh; A N Freedman; M H Farrell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Associations of perceived risk and worry with cancer health-protective actions: data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Authors:  Richard P Moser; Kevin McCaul; Ellen Peters; Wendy Nelson; Stephen E Marcus
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2007-01

5.  The Combined Effects of Measurement Error and Omitting Confounders in the Single-Mediator Model.

Authors:  Matthew S Fritz; David A Kenny; David P MacKinnon
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Risky feelings: why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-08-23

7.  Informed choice in mammography screening: a randomized trial of a decision aid for 70-year-old women.

Authors:  Erin Mathieu; Alexandra Barratt; Heather M Davey; Kevin McGeechan; Kirsten Howard; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-22

8.  Agreement between scales in the measurement of breast cancer risk perceptions.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Susan L Davids; Timothy L McAuliffe; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Russell P Harris; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 10.  A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Association between Breast Cancer Screening Intention and Behavior in the Context of Screening Cessation in Older Women.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Adlin Pinheiro; Christine E Kistler; Mara A Schonberg
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.583

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.