Daniel J Biddle1, Rébecca Robillard2, Daniel F Hermens2, Ian B Hickie2, Nicholas Glozier2. 1. Brain and Mind Research Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: daniel.biddle@sydney.edu.au. 2. Brain and Mind Research Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Validation of self-report assessment of habitual sleep duration and onset time in young people with mental ill-health. DESIGN: Validation sample. SETTING: Specialized early intervention centers for young people in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and forty-six young people with mental ill-health. INTERVENTION: N/A. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported habitual sleep duration and onset time were compared against at least 7 days of actigraphy monitoring. Average bias in and calibration of subjective measures were assessed, along with correlation of subjective and objective measures. Differences by age, sex, mental-disorder type, and reported insomnia were also explored. RESULTS: On average, subjective estimates of sleep were unbiased. Overall, each additional hour of objective habitual sleep duration predicted 41 minutes more subjective habitual sleep duration, and each hour later objective habitual sleep onset occurred predicted a 43-minute later subjective habitual sleep onset. There were subgroup differences: subjective habitual sleep duration in self-reported insomnia was shorter than objective duration by 30 minutes (SD = 119), on average. Calibration of habitual sleep duration was worse for those with mood disorders than with other primary diagnoses (t = -2.39, P = .018). Correlation between subjective and objective measures was strong for sleep onset time (Á = .667, P < .001) and moderate for sleep duration (r = .332, P < .001). For the mood disorder group, subjective and objective sleep durations were uncorrelated. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reports seem valid for large-scale studies of habitual sleep duration and onset in help-seeking young people, but assessment of habitual sleep duration requires objective measures where individual accuracy is important.
OBJECTIVES: Validation of self-report assessment of habitual sleep duration and onset time in young people with mental ill-health. DESIGN: Validation sample. SETTING: Specialized early intervention centers for young people in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and forty-six young people with mental ill-health. INTERVENTION: N/A. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported habitual sleep duration and onset time were compared against at least 7 days of actigraphy monitoring. Average bias in and calibration of subjective measures were assessed, along with correlation of subjective and objective measures. Differences by age, sex, mental-disorder type, and reported insomnia were also explored. RESULTS: On average, subjective estimates of sleep were unbiased. Overall, each additional hour of objective habitual sleep duration predicted 41 minutes more subjective habitual sleep duration, and each hour later objective habitual sleep onset occurred predicted a 43-minute later subjective habitual sleep onset. There were subgroup differences: subjective habitual sleep duration in self-reported insomnia was shorter than objective duration by 30 minutes (SD = 119), on average. Calibration of habitual sleep duration was worse for those with mood disorders than with other primary diagnoses (t = -2.39, P = .018). Correlation between subjective and objective measures was strong for sleep onset time (Á = .667, P < .001) and moderate for sleep duration (r = .332, P < .001). For the mood disorder group, subjective and objective sleep durations were uncorrelated. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reports seem valid for large-scale studies of habitual sleep duration and onset in help-seeking young people, but assessment of habitual sleep duration requires objective measures where individual accuracy is important.
Authors: Margaret M Lubas; Mariana Szklo-Coxe; Belinda N Mandrell; Carrie R Howell; Kirsten K Ness; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Kevin R Krull; Tara M Brinkman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-08-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Andrew S Tubbs; Rebecca Gallagher; Michael L Perlis; Lauren Hale; Charles Branas; Marna Barrett; Jo-Ann Gehrels; Pamela Alfonso-Miller; Michael A Grandner Journal: Sleep Biol Rhythms Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 1.186
Authors: Constanza M Vidal Bustamante; Alexandra M Rodman; Meg J Dennison; John C Flournoy; Patrick Mair; Katie A McLaughlin Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Anders M Fjell; Øystein Sørensen; Inge K Amlien; David Bartrés-Faz; Didac Maciá Bros; Nikolaus Buchmann; Ilja Demuth; Christian A Drevon; Sandra Düzel; Klaus P Ebmeier; Ane-Victoria Idland; Tim C Kietzmann; Rogier Kievit; Simone Kühn; Ulman Lindenberger; Athanasia M Mowinckel; Lars Nyberg; Darren Price; Claire E Sexton; Cristina Solé-Padullés; Sara Pudas; Donatas Sederevicius; Sana Suri; Gerd Wagner; Leiv Otto Watne; René Westerhausen; Enikő Zsoldos; Kristine B Walhovd Journal: Sleep Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 5.849