Literature DB >> 29073362

Effectiveness of Contour Augmentation with Guided Bone Regeneration: 10-Year Results.

V Chappuis1, L Rahman1, R Buser2, S F M Janner1, U C Belser2, D Buser1.   

Abstract

In aesthetic sites, the integrity of the facial bone wall dimension in the anterior maxilla is jeopardized by physiologic and structural changes postextraction. An effective regenerative protocol is key to reestablish and maintain the hard and soft tissue dimensions over time. The present prospective case series study examined the effectiveness of early implant placement with simultaneous contour augmentation through guided bone regeneration with a 2-layer composite graft in postextraction single-tooth sites over an observation period of 10 y among 20 patients. The median peri-implant bone loss was 0.35 mm between the 1- and 10-y examination. A success rate of 95% was obtained, with pleasing aesthetic outcomes and a high median Pink Esthetic Score (8). Implant crowns (ICs) revealed significant median facial recession between IC10y and IC1y (0.17 mm). The facial bone wall dimensions were assessed by preoperative cone beam computed tomography and 2 subsequent scans taken at 6 and 10 y. The median facial bone wall thickness increased significantly from 0 mm at surgery to 1.67 mm at the 10-y examination. The facial vertical bone wall peak (DIC) was located at a median distance of 0.16 mm coronal to the implant shoulder. The facial vertical bone loss of DIC amounted to 0.02 mm between 6 and 10 y. Equivalence testing was performed for the null hypothesis of a difference of >0.2 mm per year between 2 respective time points, showing stable bone conditions. Modulating factors influencing the regenerative outcomes at 10 y were the preoperative proximal crest width and soft tissue thickness. In conclusion, the present study confirmed the long-term effectiveness of early implant placement with simultaneous contour augmentation through guided bone regeneration with a 2-layer composite graft in postextraction single-tooth sites offering stable bone conditions with low risks of mucosal recessions over an observation period of 10 y ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03252106).

Entities:  

Keywords:  aesthetics; bone substitutes; clinical trial; endosseous dental implantation; guided tissue regeneration; osseointegration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29073362     DOI: 10.1177/0022034517737755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  16 in total

1.  Horizontal ridge augmentation in the anterior maxilla with in situ onlay bone grafting: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Yilin Luo; Yili Qu; Yi Man
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Current Trends in Research on Bone Regeneration: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Xu Liu; Yuli Shang; Feng Qiao; Gang Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Contour changes of peri-implant tissues are minimal and similar for a one- and a two-piece implant system over 12 years.

Authors:  Miha Pirc; Oliver Harbeck; Vitor M Sapata; Jürg Hüsler; Ronald E Jung; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Physical characterization of biphasic bioceramic materials with different granulation sizes and their influence on bone repair and inflammation in rat calvaria.

Authors:  Joviniano Martins de Oliveira Junior; Pedro Giorgetti Montagner; Rafael Coutinho Carrijo; Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Open healing of contained and non-contained extraction sockets covered with a ribose cross-linked collagen membrane: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anton Friedmann; Viktorija Meskeleviciene; Mehmet Selim Yildiz; Werner Götz; Jung Chul Park; Kai R Fischer
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  Comparison of the Bone Harvesting Capacity of an Intraoral Bone Harvesting Device and Three Different Implant Drills.

Authors:  Hyun-Chang Lim; Kyung-In Ha; Ji-Youn Hong; Ji-Young Han; Seung-Il Shin; Seung-Yun Shin; Yeek Herr; Jong-Hyuk Chung
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Clinical Evaluation of the Nasopalatine Canal in Implant-Prosthetic Treatment: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Enrique Fernández Bodereau; Viviana Yolanda Flores; Pablo Naldini; Daniel Torassa; Patricia Tortolini
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-01

8.  Bone Healing in Rabbit Calvaria Defects Using a Synthetic Bone Substitute: A Histological and Micro-CT Comparative Study.

Authors:  Minas Leventis; Peter Fairbairn; Chas Mangham; Antonios Galanos; Orestis Vasiliadis; Danai Papavasileiou; Robert Horowitz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  A Preshaped Titanium Mesh for Guided Bone Regeneration with an Equine-Derived Bone Graft in a Posterior Mandibular Bone Defect: A Case Report.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Gianbattista Greco; Enrico Gherlone
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-01

10.  MRI for the display of autologous onlay bone grafts during early healing-an experimental study.

Authors:  Tabea Flügge; Ute Ludwig; Philipp Amrein; Florian Kernen; Kirstin Vach; Johannes Maier; Katja Nelson
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.