| Literature DB >> 29073247 |
Lulu Gao1, Xicun Zhu1,2, Cheng Li1, Lizhen Cheng1.
Abstract
The new-shoot-growing stage is an important period of apple tree nutrition distribution. The objective of this study is to provide technical support for apple tree nutrition diagnosis by constructing quantitative evaluation models between the apple leaf nitrogen content during the new-shoot-growing stage and characteristic spectral parameters. The correlation coefficients between the original spectral data and the nitrogen content were calculated. Then, the sensitive bands of the nitrogen content were selected using the theory of two-dimensional (2D) correlation spectroscopy. Finally, partial least squares regression (PLSR) and support vector machine (SVM) evaluation models were established using 2 parameters: Rx (maximum spectral reflectivity in the waveband) and Sx (total spectral reflectivity in the waveband). The results showed that the sensitive bands in the 2D correlation synchronous and asynchronous spectrograms were 537-560 nm and 708-719 nm. The PLSR model can be used to estimate the nitrogen content. Compared with PLSR, SVM provided better modeling and testing results, with a larger coefficient of determination (R2) and a smaller root-mean-square error (RMSE). The SVM model based on Sx was a good backup method. The calibration R2 of the model was 0.821, its RMSE was 0.710 g·kg-1, the validation R2 was 0.768, and its RMSE was 1.019 g·kg-1. The SVM model based on 2D correlation spectroscopy can be used to quantitatively estimate the nitrogen content in apple leaves.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29073247 PMCID: PMC5658073 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the nitrogen concentration of the samples.
| Samples | Observations | Maximum/g·kg-1 | Minimum/g·kg-1 | Mean/g·kg-1 | Standard deviation/g·kg-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 100 | 34.75 | 26.84 | 30.56 | 1.69 |
| Calibration | 75 | 34.49 | 26.84 | 30.55 | 1.65 |
| Validation | 25 | 34.75 | 27.04 | 30.56 | 1.82 |
Fig 1Spectral reflectance characteristics of leaves with different nitrogen concentrations.
Fig 2Correlation analysis between the spectral reflectance and the nitrogen concentration.
Fig 3Synchronous (a) and asynchronous (b) two-dimensional correlation spectra.
The peak of synchronous and asynchronous two-dimensional correlation.
| Peak | Horizontal axis/nm | Vertical axis/nm |
|---|---|---|
| Auto-correlation peak | 537~560 | 537~560 |
| Auto-correlation peak | 708~719 | 708~719 |
| positive cross peak | 537~560 | 708~719 |
| Cross peak | 450~456 | 534~565 |
| Cross peak | 450~456 | 714~728 |
| Cross peak | 556~561 | 785~800 |
| Cross peak | 709~721 | 744~800 |
Establishment and validation of the evaluation models.
| Modeling method | Characteristic parameter | Rc2 | RMSEc/g·kg-1 | Rv2 | RMSEv/g·kg-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLSR | Rx | 0.778 | 0.773 | 0.665 | 1.378 |
| SVM | Rx | 0.819 | 0.703 | 0.759 | 1.102 |
Rc2: determination coefficient of calibration; Rv2: determination coefficient of validation; RMSEc: root-mean-square error of calibration; RMSEv: root-mean-square error of validation
Support vector machine regression model parameters.
| Degree | Gamma | Coef0 | Nu | Epsilon | Cashesize | Cost | Shrinking | Prob | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 0.5 | 0.001 | 0.5 | 0.001 | 100 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 |
Degree: set degree in kernel function; Gamma: set gamma in kernel function; Coef0: set coef0 in kernel function; Nu: set the parameter nu of nu-SVC, one-class SVM, and nu-SVR; Epsilon: set tolerance of termination criterion; Cashesize: set cache memory size in MB; Cost: set the parameter C of C-SVC, epsilon-SVR, and nu-SVR; Shrinking: whether to use the shrinking heuristics, 0 or 1; Prob: whether to train a SVR model for probability estimates, 0 or 1; P: set the epsilon in loss function of epsilon-SVR.
Fig 4Comparison of the SVM measured values and the values predicted on the basis of the (a) calibration with Rx, (b) validation with Rx, (c) calibration with Sx, and (d) validation with Sx.