Literature DB >> 29073060

How truth wins in opinion dynamics along issue sequences.

Noah E Friedkin1,2, Francesco Bullo3,4.   

Abstract

How truth wins in social groups is an important open problem. Classic experiments on social groups dealing with truth statement issues present mixed findings on the conditions of truth abandonment and reaching a consensus on the truth. No theory has been developed and evaluated that might integrate these findings with a mathematical model of the interpersonal influence system that alters some or all of its members' positions on an issue. In this paper we provide evidence that a general model in the network science on opinion dynamics substantially clarifies how truth wins in groups. Published under the PNAS license.

Keywords:  network science; opinion dynamics; truth statements

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29073060      PMCID: PMC5664530          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1710603114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  5 in total

1.  A comparative study of individual, majority, and group judgment.

Authors:  D C BARNLUND
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1959-01

2.  A formal theory of social power.

Authors:  J R FRENCH
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-05       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Group Dynamics in Janis's Theory of Groupthink: Backward and Forward.

Authors: 
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  1998-02

4.  How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect.

Authors:  Jan Lorenz; Heiko Rauhut; Frank Schweitzer; Dirk Helbing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints.

Authors:  Noah E Friedkin; Anton V Proskurnikov; Roberto Tempo; Sergey E Parsegov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  The effects of recursive communication dynamics on belief updating.

Authors:  Niccolò Pescetelli; Nick Yeung
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Mathematical Structures in Group Decision-Making on Resource Allocation Distributions.

Authors:  Noah E Friedkin; Anton V Proskurnikov; Wenjun Mei; Francesco Bullo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The impact of hypocrisy on opinion formation: A dynamic model.

Authors:  Michael T Gastner; Károly Takács; Máté Gulyás; Zsuzsanna Szvetelszky; Beáta Oborny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Achieving consensus in multilateral international negotiations: The case study of the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change.

Authors:  Carmela Bernardo; Lingfei Wang; Francesco Vasca; Yiguang Hong; Guodong Shi; Claudio Altafini
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  A framework to analyze opinion formation models.

Authors:  Carlos Andres Devia; Giulia Giordano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.