Literature DB >> 29073028

Evolutionary dynamics of language systems.

Simon J Greenhill1,2, Chieh-Hsi Wu3, Xia Hua4, Michael Dunn5, Stephen C Levinson6,7, Russell D Gray2,8.   

Abstract

Understanding how and why language subsystems differ in their evolutionary dynamics is a fundamental question for historical and comparative linguistics. One key dynamic is the rate of language change. While it is commonly thought that the rapid rate of change hampers the reconstruction of deep language relationships beyond 6,000-10,000 y, there are suggestions that grammatical structures might retain more signal over time than other subsystems, such as basic vocabulary. In this study, we use a Dirichlet process mixture model to infer the rates of change in lexical and grammatical data from 81 Austronesian languages. We show that, on average, most grammatical features actually change faster than items of basic vocabulary. The grammatical data show less schismogenesis, higher rates of homoplasy, and more bursts of contact-induced change than the basic vocabulary data. However, there is a core of grammatical and lexical features that are highly stable. These findings suggest that different subsystems of language have differing dynamics and that careful, nuanced models of language change will be needed to extract deeper signal from the noise of parallel evolution, areal readaptation, and contact.
Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Keywords:  language dynamics; language evolution; language phylogenies; linguistics; typology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29073028      PMCID: PMC5651730          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1700388114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  Delta plots: a tool for analyzing phylogenetic distance data.

Authors:  B R Holland; K T Huber; A Dress; V Moulton
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Molecular phylogenies link rates of evolution and speciation.

Authors:  Andrea J Webster; Robert J H Payne; Mark Pagel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Rejection of a serial founder effects model of genetic and linguistic coevolution.

Authors:  Keith Hunley; Claire Bowern; Meghan Healy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Detecting the node-density artifact in phylogeny reconstruction.

Authors:  Chris Venditti; Andrew Meade; Mark Pagel
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Languages evolve in punctuational bursts.

Authors:  Quentin D Atkinson; Andrew Meade; Chris Venditti; Simon J Greenhill; Mark Pagel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement.

Authors:  R D Gray; A J Drummond; S J Greenhill
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Improving the accuracy of demographic and molecular clock model comparison while accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty.

Authors:  Guy Baele; Philippe Lemey; Trevor Bedford; Andrew Rambaut; Marc A Suchard; Alexander V Alekseyenko
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Bayesian selection of nucleotide substitution models and their site assignments.

Authors:  Chieh-Hsi Wu; Marc A Suchard; Alexei J Drummond
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence.

Authors:  Alexei J Drummond; Simon Y W Ho; Matthew J Phillips; Andrew Rambaut
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis.

Authors:  Remco Bouckaert; Joseph Heled; Denise Kühnert; Tim Vaughan; Chieh-Hsi Wu; Dong Xie; Marc A Suchard; Andrew Rambaut; Alexei J Drummond
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  9 in total

1.  Environmental factors drive language density more in food-producing than in hunter-gatherer populations.

Authors:  Curdin Derungs; Martina Köhl; Robert Weibel; Balthasar Bickel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Geographical and social isolation drive the evolution of Austronesian languages.

Authors:  Cecilia Padilla-Iglesias; Erik Gjesfjeld; Lucio Vinicius
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Quantifying the spatial pattern of dialect words spreading from a central population.

Authors:  Takuya Takahashi; Yasuo Ihara
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Cross-Linguistic Data Formats, advancing data sharing and re-use in comparative linguistics.

Authors:  Robert Forkel; Johann-Mattis List; Simon J Greenhill; Christoph Rzymski; Sebastian Bank; Michael Cysouw; Harald Hammarström; Martin Haspelmath; Gereon A Kaiping; Russell D Gray
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.444

5.  The geographical configuration of a language area influences linguistic diversity.

Authors:  John L A Huisman; Asifa Majid; Roeland van Hout
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan.

Authors:  Laurent Sagart; Guillaume Jacques; Yunfan Lai; Robin J Ryder; Valentin Thouzeau; Simon J Greenhill; Johann-Mattis List
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Geospatial distributions reflect temperatures of linguistic features.

Authors:  Henri Kauhanen; Deepthi Gopal; Tobias Galla; Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Phylogenetic signal and rate of evolutionary change in language structures.

Authors:  Nataliia Hübler
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  English verb regularization in books and tweets.

Authors:  Tyler J Gray; Andrew J Reagan; Peter Sheridan Dodds; Christopher M Danforth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.